East Coast Blackout from space
Latest on light and heat quanta -- from Fitzpatrick
Once you know -- as present science does -- that an individual quantum of energy loses no energy from a distant star to your eye but in a multitude of quanta the energy falls off with the square of the distance then you must come to Fitzpatrick's conclusion that quanta are chance binding encounters and it is the amount of these chance binding encounters that are falling off with the square of the distance.
Therefore h (Planck's constant) is the angular momentum or tidal energy produced by two separate entities -- nucleus and a sigma type bond from a distant electron. . . This can be seen as similar to the earth's tides produced by a pull from two separate entities -- the sun and the moon. . . D.P.Fitzpatrick Jr.
Atom in a Box
A letter to theoretical physicists
Let's look at Milo Wolff's WSM
Rhodes Scholar Milo Wolff discuses WSM (Wave Structure of Matter)
Importance of the surroundings - Milo Wolff
Not only has Milo Wolff shown us how the electron is built and why it has spin, but also Milo Wolff has, undoubtedly, given us the mathematical method for determining the scalar wave principle that builds not only the electron but ALL these spherical standing wave permanent particles.
Milo Wolff's mathematical method is extremely important because it utilizes the surroundings in its solution, thereby being the very first mathematical proof of Mach's Principle.
Theoretically, once we know the quark frequencies, we can use Milo Wolff's method to construct all the electron orbitals.
There is no similar mathematical method yet to determine the vector forces between ALL these spherical standing wave entities.
These spherical entities have spin, precession and they orbit, all of which produce distinctive frequency vector forces.
The "A" Laws do seem to give a fair approximation of ALL these vector forces where the surroundings must also be considered.
These "A" Laws not only do this but they also seem to show you exactly how space and time are being produced.
The "A" Laws
"The reason these "A" Laws work is that this universe is built on an extraordinarily simple principle via an endless chain of vector waves that produce lower frequency spherical standing wave, scalar wave resonances that, in turn, produce space-time by spinning, orbiting and precessing.
A minimum of space-time is produced between vector waves that are in phase.
This leads, in turn, to production of vector forces between the closest sides of all such spinning spherical resonances and in the direction of the axis of each spin, orbit or precession.
These vector forces, in turn, combine to produce lower frequency, hence lower energy, scalar resonances, which in turn, spin, precess and orbit thereby producing still lower frequency space-time and its related vector forces and this goes on and on: . Thus is our universe built from the microcosm to the macrocosm." . D. Fitzpatrick
Click on any of the blue links to get what you want.
2004 COMSTOCK PRIZE IN PHYSICS.nomination form
Fly faster with a Microsoft Flight CD using this handy Lite-Flite Manual that prints out on both sides of 2 sheets of paper. . You also make a Miami to Bimini flight. . Lite-Flite Manual
For Patty Wagstaff's airplanes. . Click Here
Air Wise. . Air Travel Info
Photovault.com. . Aircraft Carrier
Aviation Top 100. . Click Here
Most Popular FREE Music-Movie Download Site. . Kazaa
National Do NOT Call Registry Click Here
NASDAQ Market & Newa
Best IRAQ WAR coverage MSNBC Newa
Iraqi Information Minister
Cost of the WAR in IRAQ
FREE Online Doctor Click Here
Health Services INFO CAPHIS
Most Popular E-MAIL CARDS Click Here
More E-MAIL CARDS Click This
47 sites--all kinds of E-MAIL CARDS Click Here
For the Guinness List of World Records Click This
World Time Zones Check B4 you chat
Want Microsoft Windows Operating System UPDATES ? Click This
You will also need Microsoft Office UPDATES (Word) Click Here
FREE easy icon maker-generator site. . Favicon UK
Corrupt DLL files will cause Explorer 6, now and then, to give you an error message, wiping out open internet programs
Repair these this way:
1. Close down Explorer by clicking "disconnect" on your internet hookup.
2. Go to Control Panel and double click the ADD/Remove Programs icon.
3. Scroll down the list and double click "Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 and Internet Tools"
4. You will then see three options: Put the dot in the "REPAIR Internet Explorer" circle option.
5. Click on OK and then "YES" on dialog box that appears and wait a few seconds until the graph shows you the repair is complete.
Better read this if you have Windows XP
Click This if you have Windows Me
Alternate Key Codes List of
For the most popular net downloads Click Here
A few more very popular net downloads Click Here
Over 20 million people use this protective download: ZoneAlarm
Scan your computer for a virus. Click Here
The very best FREE protection against e-mail worms. Trend Micro
More DOWNLOADS Many - Click This
Find a person or a Firm in the U.S. AnyWho
Find that special person anywhere.
You can't use the @ symbol and you do have to jump through some hoops to get it FREE but at least these do offer you a FREE choice. American Singles and Singles Crowd presently seem to allow you to spell out your e-mail such as "A_CUTE_GURL_4U AT YAHOO DOT COM" lomg enough for you to give hundreds of people your e-mail and I'll explain some other FREE tricks if you'll scroll down to Comments or complaints and post to me.
Totally Free personals
Like You too
Address of Love
Blue Couch Cafe
Single Christian Network
Match Doctor - FREE, but...
A Relationship TEST
ZIP Code look up: ZIP Code
Get the accurate time: World Clock
Those with Yahoo e-mail should click "Account Info"
It's at the top of the Yahoo Groups page right under the ad.
You will have to re-enter your password. .
Then scroll down and click "Edit your marketing preferences".
You will then see 13 places that you might want to change to NO and two spots under telephone and mail where you may want to check the NO boxes.
What's your car worth? Kelley Blue Book
National road closure info. Gov/traffic info
For a money exchange rate computer Click This
For Genealogy's 100 TOP Surname Search Sites . Click This
For pure searching, get the Google tool bar. . Click Here
For more searches & other links. . Cool Web Links
For Malcolm MacFarlane's Gaelic Dictionary. . Click Here
To translate something. . ALTAVISTA
The following scientists have made gigantic contributions to science relegating much, presently being taught in the universities, to the scrap heap of fiction. . Further on in this web page I'll be discussing a bit about each of these scientists and why their work is so important. . What they say supports what Fitzpatrick says in his TOE e-books that I added to this server in June of 2002.
Stephen Hawking was the first to show us that the singularity does indeed exist and it is not some aberration of tensor math as most theoretical physicists had thought. . , For Hawking's spot. . Click Here
Recently Milo Wolff became the very first scientist to mathematically prove the surroundings are entering into all of this (Mach's Principle)
Explanation. . For Milo Wolff's Quantum Science Corner. . Click Here
Not long ago Saul Perlmutter proved the existence of Einstein's cosmological constant . . For Saul Perlmutter's Supernova Cosmology Project. . Click Here
Lately, theoretical physicist Stephen Wolfram published his discovery that future super computers will show us this universe's secrets. . . Stephen Wolfram . . Official Web Page
They generate tons of debris through which one must search, in order to find a miniscule amount of something of value" . . D. P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
Hammel's Physics & Math links. . Click Here
StarDate Online. . Click
To get Earth & Sky. . Click Here
U.S. Naval Observatory. . Sun & Moon
National Weather Service. . Site Map
National Weather Service. . ALL
Space Weather. . Click
Weather Satellite. . Infrared
NASA. . Lift Off
Metric Converter. . allmath.com
Science conversion calculators. . L-39 Jet
How Stuff Works. . Click Here & learn
Science Beat. . Berkeley Lab
HAVING TROUBLE COPYING news articles to groups or e-mail???
SOLUTION: Copy article first to Word or Works---copy prevention code will be lost---then re-copy to groups or e-mail.
Thousands of GIFs (animations) you can copy & paste.
Todd's Web GIFs
Great GIFs Galore
Todd's Motorcycle GIFs
Planet II's Cupboard
SakuraDreams & more GIFs
Links to GIFs
More links to GIFs
Links - Sites with GIFs
Links - Groups with GIFs
Links - Spots with GIFs
GIF items below - Under Construction
(Yahoo's recent server changes vaporized links)
More spots with GIFs
More Sites with GIFs
Other Groups with GIFs
Other Sites with GIFs
Other Spots with GIFs
Places with GIFs
More Places with GIFs
Other Places with GIFs
More FREE books & software. .
Theory of Everything
Want to get rid of those annoying pop up ads?
These were recommended by Stewart Cheifet on Computer Chronicles. . The red Ad-Aware icon is always on my desktop. . A FREE one in each of these is offered and all are good and they update themselves automatically. . Sometimes I use Ad-Aware and Naviscope together. . It depends on who is ahead in this unending war between the spammers and these spam killing software makers. . I know of no problems with Ad-Aware but I do know that I can NOT e-mail to msn groups with Naviscope installed. .
This --new-- "Pop Up Stopper" is the most positive ad stopper because it simply prevents any new windows being opened automatically but once it's installed, you will continually be hitting the CTRL button to get extra windows opened.
So use the ones that conflict the least with the way you work.
Easy to use Pop up Ad Killer (Ad-aware)
Advanced Ad Killer & more (Naviscope)
(--NEW--) Pop Up Stopper
Close top advertising window to get this one.
Comments or complaints about anything on this site???
post to: Robert B. Duncan
© 2001, RB Duncan Press, All Rights Reserved
Site Design by
Page Design Studio
It eliminates tons of garbage and greatly simplifies science. . It will put you a quantum leap ahead of the pack in understanding relativity and quantum mechanics.
In less than a year there were more than a Quarter of a Million accesses to this site & over a Million by April 23rd, 2003 & over TWO Million by September 9th, 2003
Click for OLD Web Page total hits as of 8-24-2003 - - (server change)
Present web page data MAY appear here if West Host's new server changes are finished by Sept. 16 as promised.
Bill Gates is working on "Longhorn",
which will greatly simplify computers.
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick's Theory of Everything is the "Longhorn" of science. . It greatly simplifies science. .
Using these simple Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws, you can actually understand how everything in this universe works including special relativity (easiest to learn) and general relativity
Explanation (hardest to learn).
Fitzpatrick's "A" Laws give us the very first, simple, understandable unified field answer.
These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws lead us directly to Milo Wolff's concept, which in Wolff's words is "a proposal that was popular sixty years ago among the pioneers of quantum theory: namely that matter consisted of wave structures in space. Thus, it was proposed that matter substance, mass and charge, did not exist but were properties of the wave structure. Wyle, Schroedinger, Clifford, and Einstein were among those who believed that particles were a wave structure. Their belief was consistent with quantum theory, since the mathematics of quantum theory does not depend on the existence of particle substance or charge substance. In short, they proposed that quantum waves are real and mass/charge were mere appearances; 'Schaumkommen' in the words of Schroedinger. The reality of quantum waves, as suggested by Cramer (1986), supports the original concept of W. K. Clifford (1876) that all matter is simply 'undulations in the fabric of space'."
There's a renewal of interest in W. K. Clifford's concept now.
These simple "A" Laws show us that the abovementioned concept is probably true. . These Aufbau (Construction) Laws or "A" Laws show us how an entire universe could be constructed from nothing but spherical standing wave entities.
And this is consistent with Milo Wolff's opinion as well because he shows that particles can be formed by scalar quantum waves combining to form a standing wave
Tallyho4477 read Dan Fitzpatrick's e-book and wrote, "This science is so interesting. . I can't get over the concept. . It is as radical as it is elegant! . I'm sure my brain will now be preoccupied with this for some time to come. . Good show! . Does anybody know of more on this? . I'd like to see and read more of it. . I would like to know how this flies in the community; what they think of it; what they have to say about it."
So would I, tallyho. .. So would I.
Explanation was one scientist with all the tools, who knew and argued with Einstein, but who specifically ruled out the correct answer because he listened to his peers when he should have looked at the evidence that was all around him. . This is a spin/orbit frequency, "tuned circuit" universe and we are tuned to this wave universe much the same as a superheterodyne radio. . All repelling forces can be seen as maximum space-time creations exactly like a (high impedance) parallel tuned circuit with entities moving on geodesics 180 degrees out of phase with each other. . All attractive forces, such as gravity, can be viewed as a minimum of space-time creation overwhelmingly similar to a (low impedance) series tuned circuit with entities moving on geodesics in phase with each other.
Future super-computers, that will count the in phase vector waves (minimum space-time creation) and out of phase vector waves (maximum space-time creation) will be far superior to the tensor math of general relativity and all of present quantum mechanics.
This is essentially what these "A" Laws do now because they allow your mind to move completely out of your space-time realm and into these other space-time realms. . This eliminates extra dimensions and allows your mind to see things CORRECTLY: as 3-D and time in every space-time realm." . D. P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
Milo Wolff says, "The dual particle/wave nature of the electron has long been a paradox in physics. It is now seen that the electron consists entirely of a structure of spherical waves whose behavior creates their particle-like appearance. The correctness of this structure is supported by the physical laws which originate from this wave structure, including quantum theory, special relativity, electric force, gravity, and magnetism. This type of structure is termed a Space Resonance."
The Aufbau Laws show us that ALL permanent entities are also space resonances (spherical standing waves). . Furthermore these Aufbau Laws show us that different type entities are merely space resonances at different frequencies.
Here's what this, essentially, is all about:
Science depends on having standard units of time, mass and length. . Einstein showed us, unfortunately, that this standard was in trouble because these units seemed to vary. . Fitzpatrick's 1966 Laws --- now the "A" Laws show us the universe itself does indeed standardize units of time, mass and length but only within designated spin/orbit frequency parameters. . By also standardizing time, mass and length at each spin/orbit frequency --- instead of arbitrarily fixing the gauge --- future super computers will be able to exactly copy this example and mathematically unify the four fundamental forces to a precision undreamed of.
These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws keep things simple, therefore they obey the principle of "Occam's Razor".
Explanation . Present science is anything but simple.
Fitzpatrick shows us that --- by using a single reference frame view --- present science is forced into this complexity.
The Achilles heel of our present science is its single, subset reference frame viewpoint. . While this simplifies the math, it also obfuscates the correct frequency viewpoint.
Fitzpatrick says, "The victory of present science's mathematical achievements, using a single reference frame, is a Pyrrhic victory because it has obscured the very universal laws that enable us to easily see what is really going on in this universe.".
The single reference frame idea would be fine providing all reference frames were exactly the same but they are NOT. . They are only the same in special situations where speed, mass and surroundings remain essentially unchanged.
General Relativity has proven that when speed and/or mass changes then the amount of space-time also changes and this makes various different reference frames seem to act differently --- sometimes quite differently.
And if you insist on viewing everything ONLY from your own reference frame, as present science insists on doing, then you most certainly will not see how this entire universe is functioning.
In its present form this Aufbau concept is like a slide rule that gives you a fast approximation of the same results that general relativity gives you. . Not only that, but unbelievably, it works in the microcosm as well as in the macrocosm. . It may turn out to be as close to Einstein's unobtained unified field theory
Explanation as scientists will ever perfect. . It does indeed unify the four fundamental forces.
Of extreme importance is the recently discovered ACCELERATION of this expanding universe
Explanation and Einstein's "cosmological constant"
Explanation which this discovered acceleration necessitates. . Keep reading this web page for Fitzpatrick's crystal clear, SENSIBLE answer to this perplexing enigma.
Present science is correct if you want to view everything from a single reference frame but present science does indeed restrict your view to a single, subset reference frame. . These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws do NOT.
We've known, for almost a hundred years, that in the microcosm, frequencies are of paramount importance. . These easy to use Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws show us that this is a frequency universe, not only in the microcosm but all throughout this universe. . This is something we seem to have entirely missed.
Quantum scientists have learned that in such a frequency universe you cannot quantize without fixing the gauge.
Explanation . The rest of the scientific world, unfortunately, hasn't learned that yet.
This means that the quantum scientists who say the electron spin is different from the earth's spin are correct but not entirely correct. . Motion in one gauge is not the same as motion in a different gauge. . Present science fails to elucidate this correctly. . Only these "A" Laws show you the manner in which motion is gauge specific.
The "A" Laws
What you cannot quantize without fixing the gauge. also means is that our view of things from here, on this earth, is merely a subset view and all our precious science laws are merely subset rules that only work within certain parameters (gauge)
Explanation. . For instance, these Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws solve one of our biggest gravitational problems. . They do this by showing us that our law of gravity is merely a subset rule and that gravity will only be a constant force within certain parameters (gauge) inside our Milky Way galaxy. . More about this later.
Positive proof of the validity of these Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws is the electron orientation in both sigma and pi types of chemical bonding. (Read the FREE e-books.).
"A New Kind of Science"
is the name of the latest & best selling science book written by theoretical physicist Stephen Wolfram
. He claims, with future computers, we will find a simple & obvious answer as to how this universe really works. But the present math and science has been of little use in this quest. Stephen Wolfram says we need "a New Kind of Science ".
All things built with Tinker Toys will have a certain symmetry of construction. . Things built with Lego Blocks will have a different symmetry of construction. . Humans live in a universe built essentially from point-sized quarks and electrons. . We have discovered some aspects of this quark-electron symmetry of construction and mistakenly labeled some of these subset rules as universal laws. . Present science is really nothing more than the total collection of all these subset rules and the sundry math methods matched to them.
We can develop various types of math to match all the various subset rules handed to us by our ancestors. . This is precisely what modern day scientists have been busy doing.
Because present science has made impressive accomplishments, this old bureaucratic university system is seen as the ultimate authority. . People --- even top scientists --- simply will not question the supreme authority. . The evidence of how this universe really works is all around us, yet few will question any old scientific beliefs. . Few will look at any evidence contrary to established beliefs. . You will see a good example of this as we look at the cause of magnetism shortly.
In the future, giant super computers will be set up to work out exactly how all these spherical standing wave, point sized quarks and electrons actually build our universe. . The frequency aspect of it is so complicated that no human mind can possibly understand it. . This is why Stephen Wolfram is correct when he tells us that we will learn how everything works from future super computers.
But NOW even before these future, giant super computers arrive, these "A" Laws presently show us exactly how and why this myriad mixture of waves produces this universe that we see all around us.
Prevalent today is our ancestor's view, in a slightly modified form, that present science gives us from a single, subset reference frame. . The view of present science is really only an approximation of what's going on frequency wise. . It's a good enough approximation if you don't want to look too far from your own reference frame. . However, these "A" Laws, will give you the best approximation if you want to view how things are working in all the different TYPES of reference frames (different GAUGES)
Explanation throughout this entire universe.
Stop for a moment and think. . If this universe is really a frequency universe all throughout, then we have yet to find out what all these terms such as motion, distance, speed, acceleration, larger and smaller really mean in terms of this frequency universe.
Also you must only use these terms such as motion, distance, speed, acceleration, larger and smaller within one certain gauge because these terms are only good within certain parameters.
Stop once more and think again. . If all the various particles in this universe are really spherical standing waves (space resonances), as quantum science has proven, then we should see ways in which all these spherical standing wave particles act similarly --- and we do. . But you'll have to keep reading to find this.
Stop for a third time and think about these waves because if everything however small is made from waves then there can be no such thing as the smallest particle and what you have instead is a universe composed of a frequency spectrum of infinite span.
You will also have spherical standing wave entities (space resonances) at regular intervals like keys on a piano with a keyboard of infinite length.
Before you say NO to this, you will find --- if you keep reading --- that if this is indeed such an infinite frequency universe then all our present problems, handed to us by our present science, get suitably solved.
Within this infinite frequency spectrum is this particular quark-electron subharmonic frequency --- OUR WORLD --- from which we discern certain spherical standing wave entities as solids. . But quantum mechanics has shown they are really waves. . With this Aufbau Law or "A" Law concept you can easily visualize these spherical standing wave entities (space resonances) acting as BOTH waves and particles.
The "A" Laws
You will never understand how this entire universe works unless you can see things as BOTH waves and particles. . This new Aufbau Law or "A" Law concept is the only method by which entities can be easily viewed as BOTH waves and particles (space resonances). . Present science fails in this respect.
What both Stephen Wolfram and Daniel P. Fitzpatrick see is that our present science is nothing more than a vast collection of subset rules matched to various types of math. . These two scientists seem to be the very first people to realize that future super computers, programmed with a completely revised "New Kind of Science", will be the tools necessary for us to get an accurate picture of what is really going on in this universe.
Yes, our present science gives us all the math to tell us exactly how much attraction we are going to have with magnetism or with gravity. . But present science fails to tell us exactly why the spinning electron
gives us this invisible force of magnetism or why a preponderance of mass gives this invisible force of gravity.
Your mind has two easy ways to view this frequency universe. . Either the present science view from a single subset reference frame or this "A" Law view. . You lose things and gain things with both views.
The "A" Laws
These two views are entirely different, widely divergent views. . But BOTH views are needed for the human mind to properly understand this entire universe
In the quantum world the standard model
leaves a lot to be desired. . Also this present science offers no explanation as to why we are forced to use relativity corrections (even in GPS).
And since it offers no answer as to why we have gravity or any of the other invisible forces then what both Stephen Wolfram and Daniel Fitzpatrick point out becomes extremely important.
I wrote this web page as an introduction to Fitzpatrick's e-books. . I know this is a lengthy web page but in the past decades Fitzpatrick has written far more than the few books herein displayed. . This long web page emphasizes some of the more important ideas in those other publications that you cannot get here. . So, in addition to these few e-books that you can get here, I believe this protracted offering of mine is also well worth reading.
How does Nobel Prize winner John F. Nash's concept of "equilibrium"
Explanation also show us why all these atoms and stars stay separated?
You'll have to read through this lengthy dissertation to see why.
This web page is indeed a long, detailed presentation. . But unlike most scientific journals, this is sprinkled throughout with surprises. . So it's far less boring than most things printed up by a university press. . It's also seasoned with a few authentic scientific firsts, which should appeal to those with such specialized tastes.
Lincoln Barnett, who was a friend of Einstein, wrote the best seller "The Universe and Dr. Einstein
" Explanation and he wrote numerous articles on relativity for the Britannica. . Lincoln Barnett wrote an encouraging letter to Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr. when Fitzpatrick published his first book in 1966 showing that Ampere
essentially laid the cornerstone for a simple, understandable unified field concept. You will find a full page in the Sunday Book Review section of the New York Times devoted to Fitzpatrick's book. This page in the Times has a big picture of a galaxy on it. . I forget which Sunday or even which month it was but I know the year was 1967. . If someone finds it, please give me the date and I'll update this web page.
Since his retirement, Fitzpatrick has put more of the pieces of this great puzzle together and has finally given us "a New Kind of Science" predicted by Stephen Wolfram.
Now, in this FREE e-book, Fitzpatrick shows you exactly why we have gravity and all the other invisible forces.
"It's so simple. It's so obvious. Why didn't I think of this?" will be the statement of a good number of scientists in many universities as this gets further attention.
These extremely simple Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws finally bring a clarity to the reasons we have both magnetism and gravity. . All you have now is utter confusion. . The majority of high school graduates today do not even know that the north pole of the earth is really a south magnetic pole.
Explanation . With gravity the confusion is even worse because none in these universities can tell you the real reason why the arms of these spiral galaxies can exceed the speed of their escape velocity and still not fly all apart.
Using these "A" Laws, a kid in grammar school can easily visualize both magnetism and gravity correctly and understand far more of what is really going on than all those being presently graduated in all the high schools and all the universities.
The "A" Laws
The Hartree approximations
are proof that a brand new type of frequency math general relativity must replace the special relativity now being used in quantum mechanics. . Using only special relativity, quantum scientists will disagree about the distorted information that moves from that gauge (that TYPE of reference frame) to our reference frame here. . These easy to use "A" Laws show us the electron is in its own space-time
Explanation and not in our space-time. . Therefore we will not see the correct aspects of the electron's spin in our space-time reference frame.
Spin is presently viewed as simply a certain movement of a solid. . We do not see the complex wave function involved. . There is a complex wave function involved which these Aufbau or "A" Laws point out.
Milo Wolff correctly states "In Dirac's theoretical work the spin of a particle is measured in units of angular momentum, like rotating objects of human size. But particle spin is uniquely a quantum phenomenon, different than human scale angular momentum. Its value is fixed and independent of particle mass or angular velocity."
"The reason that its value is fixed and independent of particle mass or angular velocity is that the electron receives the majority of its inertial qualities from its surrounding similar, same scalar frequency, electrons and not from the surrounding quarks from which we receive our inertial mass."
The electron orbits the tri-quark nucleus because of a similar quark-electron harmonic frequency (which we correctly or incorrectly measure as the electron's mass) and not because of either quark inertial mass or electron inertial qualities.
It is plain to see the "A" Laws tell us that an entity's full inertial mass will only exist in one gauge. . Inertial mass cannot be entirely transferred out of any one particular spin/orbit frequency reference frame. . In other words we simply do not see the entire correct inertial mass of the electron in our reference frame. . Our reference frame is a quark-electron subharmonic frequency. . The electron is a scalar wave composition of waves at the de Broglie wavelength. These are at a much higher frequency reference frame than our reference frame.
Or as Milo Wolff so accurately puts it: "The frequency mc2/h of the waves was first proposed by Schroedinger and deBroglie, proportional to the mass of the electron. This frequency is the mass so that mass measurements are actually frequency measurements. There is no mass 'substance' in nature."
The quantum people, who do not understand this and who do not understand that a different gauge means an entirely different space-time interval (different frequency space resonance) and who understand nothing of general relativity nor of these new "A" Laws will claim that the spin of the electron is different from the earth's spin. . It is and it isn't. . It is not absolutely different and people who say it is, are absolutely wrong and scientists Samuel Goudsmit and George Uhlenbeck were absolutely right: . The electron spins exactly like the earth spins---but in its own TYPE of space-time reference frame (gauge),
Explanation which is certainly not our reference frame.
Fitzpatrick spells it out to the quantum experts in terms they understand. . He says, "The advantages of using a new form of general relativity based on Milo Wolff's math, over the special relativity now being used in quantum mechanics, is that it will be more accurate than the Hartree approximations. . It will allow one to quantize without fixing another gauge, because this is essentially what general relativity does. . It will also allow one to see that the same type distortion of space-time that causes the earth's spin also causes the electron's spin. . It---like the "A" Laws---will allow one to clearly see that the spin of the smallest particle is really no different from the spin of the largest super cluster."
The "A" Laws
Fitzpatrick then continues:
"All the electron really has is a form of gyroscopic inertia in its own spin/orbit frequency reference frame (gauge) but we mistakenly see this as magnetism and charge in this entirely different subset reference frame of ours. . I've been explaining the essentials of this in various publications since 1966."
"In 1925 Samuel Goudsmit and George Uhlenbeck not only discovered that the electron was spinning but they also saw they could determine the direction in which these electrons were spinning. Explanation This was the first time we could see our laws of magnetism were obscuring the correct picture. . Our present laws of magnetism were derived long before anyone even knew about electrons and these laws should have been changed in 1925 with this discovery of the electron spin. . Unfortunately this entire world seems perfectly content with its inept, bureaucratic educational system and these laws of magnetism were never changed."
"If you look down at the north pole face of a magnet the electrons causing the magnetism, in that magnet, will all be spinning clockwise. . Do the same for a magnet with its south pole facing you and the spins will all be counter-clockwise. . However, when you reverse this south pole magnet and see it attracts the other magnet, all the spins in both magnets are now clockwise from your point of view. . So it's no longer opposites attracting once you reverse one of the magnets. . Electrons in both magnets are spinning the SAME way when these magnets are attracting. . The old idea of opposites attracting should have gone out the window in 1925."
"High schools and universities still teach that in magnetism opposites attract. . North and south poles do seem to attract each other if you are ignorant about the electron spin, but this is positively displaying the wrong message. . Exactly the reverse picture that similar geodesic paths attract is what is needed. . We know the spinning electron
is the smallest unit of magnetism and these "A" Laws agree perfectly with what we know as fact. . An example is that these electrons will only attract when they are "locked" in a position so that the closest sides of each are going in the same geodesic path. . These "A" Laws then show us the reason a polar attraction is the strongest of any angular attraction: . In a polar attraction the entire portions of both electrons are spinning in the same geodesic path. . This is a far better and clearer explanation of magnetism than that presently being taught.
Also, by using this (Ampere's) description of magnetism, you produce a method of unifying not only the invisible forces of magnetism and gravity but the strong and weak forces as well and the laws used in this method are called "Ampere's Laws", "the Aufbau Laws" or simply the "A" Laws."