SEE, — HOW the complexities of
FIELD THEORIES HID from us the fact that relative motion (phase) between these spinning entities, in the micro & macro universe, gives us all the attractive and repulsive Fundamental Forces.
Field Theories in html:

Also, Field Theories in Word:

& Field Theories in Adobe pdf:

Fitzpatrick's 1966 book showed the relative motion laws of A. Ampère unified the forces.
Fitz's first book in 1966

Fitz's 1966 book in PDF

EVERYTHING here is FREE, & NO pop up ads with these either.

This was the way the site --below-- looked many years ago. - - Dan Fitz.

R. B. Duncan Press


All downloads are
absolutely free!!

Bush Akbar
The T.O.E. that eluded Einstein . . . Fitzpatrick's Theory of Everything
Down to Earth fiction
to stimulate your imagination
Scientific pursuits
to pass the time
Fitz's Theory of Everything
Cambridge T.O.E.
The Sundial Book


Fitz's Theory of Everything:
a short, concise version

Hi Res Photo
N.Y. WTC Best
photo yet

Flat Sundial
Wall Dial
Sun Table





More FREE books & software: Theory of Everything

© 2001, RB Duncan Press, All Rights Reserved
Site Design by Page Design Studio








Want to get rid of those annoying pop up ads?
Click Here Pop up Ad killer

post to: Robert Byron Duncan


After I read this book, I knew that I had to publicize it. Yes, I thought to myself, just as no university people had even the closet concept to the idea of the phonograph when Edison produced one, so have none from the university system produced anything as brilliant as this astonishingly simple, brand new concept of unification.



Andre Ampere was a child prodigy who knew all the math of his era by the time he was 12 years old. He formulated the first electrical laws but could not produce the math for his own laws so these "A" Laws were eclipsed by Michael Faraday's laws which Maxwell provided the math for and which Heinrich Hertz greatly clarified.



Jean Foucault was the first to show us what modern gyroscopes show us and what George Berkeley, Ernst Mach and Maxwell claimed, that our inertia must stem from our surroundings. But this implies an absolute reference frame while the Galileo-Einstein concept indicates that you cannot have an absolute reference frame and this is backed up by the speed of light being a constant independent of the velocity of the source or the observer. Any unified field theory, worth its salt, must be able to resolve this disparity. The one you are about to look at does so admirably.



Do we have to visualize both an absolute reference frame and separate, individual reference frames? Perhaps: The crew of modern airliners must visualize even more than that. They have to see their airliners flying at 4 different airspeeds, Indicated airspeed (IAS) for take off & landings; Mach for flying the corridor; True airspeed (TAS); and finally ground speed read out when selecting an Omni station.



Surroundings must be entering into the picture because Niels Bohr was able to bring centrifugal force down below that magic level of Planck's constant and into the microcosm where he matched each orbital drop of an electron to a specific light frequency in the spectrum. But he could only do this with the single electron hydrogen and helium atoms. He couldn't do this with heavier atoms and molecules. Why? Because the surroundings changed too much. So surroundings are extremely important and present science seem to be totally disregarding this even though Einstein initially predicated his theory of general relativity on the surroundings being homogeneous and isotropic (more or less constant and evenly distributed throughout).



So we are pleased to bring you all of the above & more in Daniel P. Fitzpatrick's Theory of Everything. The new Aufbau Laws, therein, give you a simple, crystal-clear "big picture" of unification and they rest on a solid foundation set up by Andre Ampere, George Berkeley, Jean Foucault, Ernst Mach, James Clerk Maxwell and Kurt Godel. These new "A" Laws show Saul Perlmutter to be absolutely correct in that we do have Einstein's cosmological constant---a repulsive force---between all the stars and galaxies in this universe. Fitzpatrick was the very first scientist to point out the fact that we would also have Einstein's principle of equivalence with this equal and opposite force of gravity and therefore we could never distinguish between a repulsive force type steady state universe and an accelerating, expanding universe. So, says Fitzpatrick, "Perlmutter's discovered acceleration makes perfect sense."



D. P. Fitzpatrick states, "The problem then becomes one of getting an explanation for a Big Bang without us having an existing physically expanding universe today. If surroundings are involved then there will be a certain amount of a type of friction with the surroundings. So the solution to a present steady state universe was shown to me in the last week of December of 1950 at the Miami Air Show when I saw William T. Piper, who founded the Piper Aircraft Corporation. God knows how many airplanes he built from 1929 'til he died in 1970 but he built over 5,000 of his Piper Cubs just for the Government during World War ll. He was about a week shy of his seventieth birthday when he demonstrated a short field landing at the Miami Air Show with one of his Piper airplanes. I used what I saw that day to save myself once. Piper brought his little Piper airplane in and touched down on the runway. Then as soon as he was down he immediately hit the right brake as hard as he could and I have never seen anything like that in all my life because now here was this Piper airplane that was suddenly transformed into a fast spinning top right in front of my eyes. That airplane went no further down that runway. All that energy now suddenly went into spinning that Piper airplane around like a giant top and it zipped round and round and round: it was the most incredible sight that I have ever seen. It was announced that he was going to demonstrate a short field landing but I had never expected to see anything like that. Piper lived almost another twenty years after that too and died a year short of his 90th birthday. I was ushered in to flying being trained in one of his yellow Piper Cubs and I almost exited this life early because of one of them too".



So did this initial expansion eventually turn into all this particle spinning and a steady state universe? Fitzpatrick says, "It must have because an accelerating universe requires a PRESENT force and there is none. A PAST force could cause a big bang but a PAST force could not cause this acceleration that Perlmutter's group found. Others now have added even more proof to Perlmutter's findings. So folks, the only answer to this acceleration is that it is a perceived acceleration caused by Einstein's principle of equivalence. What Saul Perlmutter really discovered is that we have a repulsive force type steady state universe exactly as Einstein originally claimed."



In message #5492 of Yahoo's Theory of Everything Group, Bangstrom stated that, "Time is the fourth spatial dimension MOVING at the speed of light." This is probably the present scientific consensus. But I know that I'm not the same person I was in kindergarten so consequently, I also must not be the very same person I was a microsecond ago either. Thus, I want to remove one word from Bangstrom's statement and change it: I want to say, "Time is the fourth spatial dimension BEING CREATED at the speed of light." Then I want to add to what Berkeley, Foucault, Mach and Maxwell pointed out and say that not only our inertia but our time is being created by our surroundings. Once this is accepted then Ampere's Laws or the Aufbau Laws or the "A" Laws or whatever you want to call them, will show you exactly how this space time is being created and the answer to unifying all the invisible forces becomes crystal clear. Only a few of us see this presently but as time goes on and more people read Fitzpatrick's e-books then that will most certainly change.--------R.B. Duncan





SCHOOL TEACHERS, please give this sundial software to your students. We will need all the future scientists we can get. If I was teaching Excel then I would begin with this software. It's so easy to use. Open all 4 sundial items in Microsoft Works if need be. This free Sundial Book & software was the same offered by Sundialsoft in Popular Mechanics and sold to countries all over the world for $10 per floppy even before this internet was flourishing. One letter, I am told, came to them from Saudi Arabia with $7 in single bills. A promise to pay the additional $3 was made if the product arrived and was found to be satisfactory. The floppy was shipped. Several months later, from Saudi Arabia, came a letter with 3 more American dollar bills. So this should be positive proof that the Sundial Book & Excel software are well worth downloading.



To whom it may concern: The Arabic language was invented long before verbs were invented. Action is automatic so verbs are not needed in Arabic. The words 'Allah akbar', in Arabic, mean God is great. God was great. God will be great. Where you do NOT want to imply the action of a verb, you put 'el'. Our 'the' is derived from this Arabic 'el' We still use our 'the' because of tradition and nothing else since we now have verbs. So our 'the' is like the appendix in our body: It's no longer of any real use to us.