45 sites--all kinds of E-MAIL CARDS Click Here
For the Guinness World Records Click This
Want Microsoft UPDATES for any Windows computer? Click This
For the most popular net downloads Click Here
Over 20 million people use this protective download: ZoneAlarm
Scan your computer for a virus. Click Here
Find a person or a Firm in the U.S. AnyWho
ZIP Code look up: ZIP Code
Get the accurate time: World Clock
What's your car worth? Kelley Blue Book
National road closure info. Gov/traffic info
For a money exchange rate computer Click This
Those with Yahoo e-mail should click "Account Info"
It's at the top of the Yahoo Groups page right under the ad.
You will have to re-enter your password. .
Then scroll down and click "Edit your marketing preferences".
You will then see 13 places that you might want to change to NO and two spots under telephone and mail where you may want to check the NO boxes.
HAVING TROUBLE COPYING news articles to groups or e-mail???
SOLUTION: Copy article first to Word or Works---copy prevention code will be lost---then re-copy to groups or e-mail.
For Genealogy's 100 TOP Surname Search Sites . Click This
For pure searching, get the Google tool bar. . Click Here
For Malcolm MacFarlane's Gaelic Dictionary. . Click Here
To translate something. . SYSTRAN
The four following scientists have made gigantic contributions to science. . Further on in this web page I'll be discussing a bit about each of these scientists and why their work is so important. . What they say supports what Fitzpatrick says in his TOE e-books that I added to this server in June of 2002.
For Stephen Hawking's singularity. . Click Here
For Milo Wolff's Quantum Science Corner. . Click Here
Saul Perlmutter's Supernova Cosmology Project. . Click Here
Theoretical physicist Stephen Wolfram. . Official Web Page
Fly faster with a Microsoft Flight CD using this handy Lite-Flite Manual that prints out on both sides of 2 sheets of paper. . You also make a Miami to Bimini flight. . Lite-Flite Manual
For Patty Wagstaff's airplanes. . Click Here
Aviation Top 100. . Click Here
To get Earth & Sky. . Click Here
Metric Converter. . allmath.com
Science conversion calculators. . L-39 Jet
How Stuff Works. . Click Here & learn
Thousands of GIFs (animations) you can copy & paste.
Todd's Web GIFs
Todd's Motorcycle GIFs
Planet II's Cupboard
SakuraDreams & more GIFs
41 sites with GIFs
Sites with GIFs
Groups with GIFs
Spots with GIFs
More spots with GIFs
More Sites with GIFs
Other Groups with GIFs
Other Sites with GIFs
Other Spots with GIFs
Places with GIFs
Click on any of the blue links to get what you want.
More FREE books & software. .
Theory of Everything
Want to see a cool clock?. .
Want to get rid of those annoying pop up ads?
These were recommended by Stewart Cheifet on Computer Chronicles. . The red Ad-Aware icon is always on my desktop. . A FREE one in each of these is offered and all are good and they update themselves automatically. . Sometimes I use Ad-Aware and Naviscope together. . It depends on who is ahead in this unending war between the spammers and these spam killing software makers. . I know of no problems with Ad-Aware but I do know that I can NOT e-mail to msn groups with Naviscope installed. .
This --new-- "Pop Up Stopper" is the most positive ad stopper because it simply prevents any new windows being opened automatically but once it's installed, you will continually be hitting the CTRL button to get extra windows opened.
So use the ones that conflict the least with the way you work.
Easy to use Pop up Ad Killer (Ad-aware)
Advanced Ad Killer & more (Naviscope)
(--NEW--) Pop Up Stopper
Comments or complaints about anything on this site???
post to: Robert B. Duncan
© 2001, RB Duncan Press, All Rights Reserved
Site Design by
Page Design Studio
In less than a year there were more than a Quarter of a Million accesses to this site & over Half a Million by January 18th, 2003.
Click for Web Page Data
If you have any interest in science then read this web page. . It eliminates tons of garbage and greatly simplifies science. . It will put you a quantum leap ahead of the pack in understanding relativity and quantum mechanics.
Bill Gates is working on "Longhorn"
which will greatly simplify computers.
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick's Theory of Everything is the "Longhorn" of science. . It greatly simplifies science. .
Using these new, simple "A" Laws, you can actually understand how everything in this universe works including special relativity (easiest to learn) and general relativity (hardest to learn).
We've known, for almost a hundred years, that in the microcosm, frequencies are of paramount importance. . These easy to use "A" Laws show us that this is a frequency universe, not only in the microcosm but all throughout this universe. . This is something we seem to have entirely missed.
What this means is that our view of things from here, on this earth, is merely a subset view and all our precious science laws are merely subset rules that only work within certain parameters. . For instance, these "A" Laws solve one of our biggest gravitational problems. . They do this by showing us that our law of gravity is merely a subset rule and that gravity will only be a constant force within certain parameters inside our Milky Way galaxy---more about this later.
"A New Kind of Science"
is the name of the latest & best selling science book written by theoretical physicist Stephen Wolfram
. He claims we will find a simple & obvious answer as to how this universe really works. But the present math and science has been of little use in this quest. Stephen Wolfram says we need "a New Kind of Science ".
All things built with Tinker Toys will have a certain symmetry of construction. . Things built with Lego Blocks will have a different symmetry of construction. . . Humans live in a universe built from point sized quarks and electrons. . We have discovered some aspects of this quark-electron symmetry of construction and mistakenly labeled some of these subset rules as universal laws. . Present science is really nothing more than the total collection of all these subset rules and the sundry math methods matched to them.
We can develop various types of math to match all the various subset rules handed to us by our ancestors. . This is precisely what modern day scientists have been busy doing.
Present science has made impressive accomplishments, keeping this old bureaucratic university system as the ultimate authority. . The evidence of how this universe really works is all around us, yet few will question the old beliefs and look at this evidence. . People---even top scientists---simply will not question the supreme authority. . You will see a good example of this as we look at the cause of magnetism shortly.
In the future, giant super computers will be set up to work out exactly how all these spherical standing wave, point sized quarks and electrons actually build our universe. . The frequency aspect of it is so complicated that no human mind can possibly understand it. . This is why Stephen Wolfram is correct when he tells us that we will learn how everything works from future super computers.
Prevalent today is our ancestor's view, in a slightly modified form, that present science gives us from a single, subset reference frame. . The view of present science is really only an approximation of what's going on frequency wise. . It's a good enough approximation if you don't want to look too far from your own reference frame. . However, these "A" Laws, will give you the best approximation if you want to view how things are working in this entire universe.
Stop for a moment and think. . If this universe is really a frequency universe all throughout, then we have yet to find out what all these terms such as motion, distance, speed, acceleration, larger and smaller really mean in terms of this frequency universe.
What both Stephen Wolfram and Daniel P. Fitzpatrick see is that our present science is nothing more than a vast collection of subset rules matched to various types of math. . These two scientists seem to be the very first people to realize that future super computers, programmed with a completely revised "New Kind of Science", will be the tools necessary for us to get an accurate picture of what is really going on in this universe.
Yes, our present science gives us all the math to tell us exactly how much attraction we are going to have with magnetism or with gravity. . But present science fails to tell us exactly why the spinning electron
gives us this invisible force of magnetism or why a preponderance of mass gives this invisible force of gravity.
You really have two ways to view this frequency universe. . Either the present science view from a single subset reference frame or this new "A" Law view. . You lose things and gain things with both views.
In the quantum world the standard model
leaves a lot to be desired. . Also this present science offers no explanation as to why we are forced to use relativity corrections (even in GPS).
And since it offers no answer as to why we have gravity or any of the other invisible forces then what both Stephen Wolfram and Daniel Fitzpatrick point out becomes extremely important.
I wrote this web page as an introduction to Fitzpatrick's e-books. . I know this is a lengthy web page but in the past decades Fitzpatrick has written far more than the few books herein displayed. . This long web page emphasizes some of the more important ideas in those other publications that you cannot get here. . So in addition to the e-books, I believe this protracted offering of mine is also well worth reading.
How does Nobel Prize winner John F. Nash's economic concept
Explanation also show us why our universe works?
You'll have to read through this lengthy dissertation to see why.
This web page is indeed a long, detailed presentation. . But unlike most scientific journals, this is sprinkled throughout with surprises. . So it's far less boring than most things printed up by a university press. . It's also seasoned with a few authentic scientific firsts, which should appeal to those with such specialized tastes.
Lincoln Barnett, who was a friend of Einstein, wrote the best seller "The Universe and Dr. Einstein
" Explanation and he wrote numerous articles on relativity for the Britannica. . Lincoln Barnett wrote an encouraging letter to Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr. when Fitzpatrick published his first book in 1967 showing that Ampere
essentially laid the cornerstone for a simple, understandable unified field concept. You will find a full page in the Sunday Book Review section of the New York Times devoted to Fitzpatrick's book. This page in the Times has a big picture of a galaxy on it. . I forget which Sunday or even which month it was but I know the year was 1967. . If someone finds it, please give me the date and I'll update this web page.
Since his retirement, Fitzpatrick has put more of the pieces of this great puzzle together and has finally given us "a New Kind of Science" predicted by Stephen Wolfram.
Now, in this FREE e-book, Fitzpatrick shows you exactly why we have gravity and all the other invisible forces.
"It's so simple. It's so obvious. Why didn't I think of this?" will be the statement of a good number of scientists in many universities as this gets further attention.
These extremely simple new "A" Laws finally bring a clarity to the reasons we have both magnetism and gravity. . All you have now is utter confusion. . The majority of high school graduates today do not even know that the north pole of the earth is really a south magnetic pole. . With gravity the confusion is even worse because none in these universities can tell you the real reason why the arms of these spiral galaxies can exceed the speed of their escape velocity and still not fly all apart.
Using these new "A" Laws, a kid in grammar school can easily visualize both magnetism and gravity correctly and understand far more of what is really going on than all those being presently graduated in all the high schools and all the universities.
The Hartree approximations
are proof that a brand new type of frequency math general relativity must replace the special relativity now being used in quantum mechanics. . Using only special relativity, quantum scientists will disagree about the distorted information that moves from that gauge (specific reference frame) to our reference frame here. . Remember the electron is in its own space time
Explanation and not in our space time. . Therefore we will not see the correct aspects of the electron's spin in our space time reference frame. . The quantum people, who understand nothing of general relativity, will claim that the spin of the electron is different from the earth's spin. . People who say that are absolutely wrong and scientists Samuel Goudsmit and George Uhlenbeck were asolutely right: . The electron spins exactly like the earth spins---but in its own space time reference frame, which is certainly not our reference frame.
Fitzpatrick spells it out to the quantum experts in terms they understand. . He says, "The advantages of using a new form of general relativity based on Milo Wolff's math, over the special relativity now being used in quantum mechanics, is that it will be more accurate than the Hartree approximations. . It will allow one to quantize without fixing the gauge, because this is essentially what general relativity does. . It will also allow one to see that the same type distortion of space time that causes the earth's spin also causes the electron's spin. . It---like the "A" Laws---will allow one to clearly see that the spin of the smallest particle is really no different from the spin of the largest super cluster."
Fitzpatrick then continues:
"All the electron really has is a form of gyroscopic inertia in its own spin/orbit frequency reference frame but we mistakenly see this as magnetism and charge in this subset reference frame of ours. . I've been explaining the essentials of this in various publications since 1967."
"In 1925 Samuel Goudsmit and George Uhlenbeck not only discovered that the electron was spinning but they also saw they could determine the direction in which these electrons were spinning. Explanation This was the first time we could see our laws of magnetism were obscuring the correct picture. . Our present laws of magnetism were derived long before anyone even knew about electrons and these laws should have been changed in 1925 with this discovery of the electron spin. . Unfortunately this entire world seems perfectly content with its inept, bureaucratic educational system and these laws of magnetism were never changed."
"If you look down at the north pole face of a magnet the electrons causing the magnetism, in that magnet, will all be spinning clockwise. . Do the same for a magnet with its south pole facing you and the spins will all be counter-clockwise. . However, when you reverse this south pole magnet and see it attracts the other magnet, all the spins in both magnets are now clockwise from your point of view. . So it's no longer opposites attracting once you reverse one of the magnets. . Electrons in both magnets are spinning the SAME way when these magnets are attracting. . The old idea of opposites attracting should have gone out the window in 1925."
"High schools and universities still teach that in magnetism opposites attract. . North and south poles do seem to attract each other if you are ignorant about the electron spin, but this is positively displaying the wrong message. . Exactly the reverse picture that similar geodesic paths attract is what is needed. . We know the spinning electron
is the smallest unit of magnetism and these "A" Laws agree perfectly with what we know as fact. . An example is that these electrons will only attract when the closest sides of each are going in the same geodesic path. . These "A" Laws then show us the reason a polar attraction is the strongest of any angular attraction: . In a polar attraction the entire portions of both electrons are spinning in the same geodesic path. . This is a far better and clearer explanation of magnetism than that presently being taught. . Also, by using this new description of magnetism, you produce a method of unifying not only the invisible forces of magnetism and gravity but the strong and weak forces as well and the laws used in this method are called "Ampere's Laws", "the Aufbau Laws" or simply the "A" Laws."
"If you teach science then you have a moral responsibility to teach your students that the attraction in magnetism is caused by similar geodesic paths attracting and NOT opposites attracting. . Poisoning the minds of millions of kids with today's BACKWARDS assumption of magnetism has been the biggest factor in preventing several generations of scientists from finding the answer to Einstein's quest for a unified field."
"It's been over 75 years now that scientists and educators knew that electrons would attract other electrons when their closest sides were moving the same way and this attraction is stonger in a polar attraction where the entire portions of these electrons are spinning in the same direction. . Yet they are still preaching "opposites attract" almost the very reverse of this."
"You cannot continue to preach an old legend and claim that you are teaching science."
"When you know what you are teaching is wrong, and actually the reverse is true, then you are as guilty as those Nazi's in Nuremberg who said, "I was only obeying orders."
"And this is only the tip of the iceberg of what is wrong."
"Yes, you can use these old legends (like opposite magnetic poles attract) as long as you match some math to them but they will only work in one gauge (type of reference frame). . Present science has matched some math to many old legends. . People will eventually discover this. . You cannot fool all the people all the time."
"Only electrons that are perfectly FREE are able to repel each other 100% of the time. Read the free T.O.E. e-book to see why. . Electrons that get more or less "locked" in a certain position both attract and repel other electrons and act exactly like tiny magnets. . These "locked" electrons---attracting other electrons---facilitate chemical bonding."
Once you know that two electrons attract whenever the closest sides of these electrons are going in the same geodesic path then it behooves one to ask the following question: . Will all these other spinning entities, we see both in the microcosm and macrocosm, behave the same way? . And the answer surprisingly comes out YES.
The following is Fitzpatrick's Law and it pertains to all of these spinning entities we see in our universe whether they are in the microcosm or the macrocosm.
Every perfectly FREE spinning entity will always repel another same type, same sized, perfectly FREE spinning entity. .
All the invisible attractive forces, in this entire universe, are derived whenever these spinning entities lose some of their freedom and get "locked" somewhat into a certain position in respect to their surroundings.
Looking at this entire universe, all the FREE spinning entities---no matter how large or how small---repel all the other same sized similar entities just like the electron. . Attractive forces come about after these entities get "locked" somewhat into a certain geodesic path or position. . This is what all these universities should be teaching today but they are not. . And this is what this long web page and Fitzpatrick's e-books will explain to you if you take the time to read them.
Both special and general relativity show the transformation of space into time and time into space and so do these "A" Laws. . But in addition they show you why these transverse waves
Explanation (radio waves, light, heat and gravity) do not need any aether medium to function in and this is a first for any such theory.
Fitzpatrick says, "The tensor math of general relativity is the best mechanism we have so far that gives us accurate answers when things go too fast and get too massive. . Special relativity falls short in this respect. . So we must ask ourselves what kind of a universe is this in which this tensor math works so well? . We know it must be a pretty preposterous universe in which space can convert into time and vice versa so we must accept the answer even though the answer we come up with also seems preposterous."
The premise of this is simple: There are not really 4 fundamental forces
Explanation but actually only one invisible force. . But our present science, using a single subset reference frame, prevents us from seeing this as one force. . These extremely simple new "A" Laws show us exactly how all this comes about because of a constant creation of space time
at different spin/orbit frequencies. . These "A" Laws not only give you the "big picture" of exactly how this occurs but they give humans the very first picture of what space and time really are as well. . These new "A" Laws instantly give you an "approximate big picture" of what is really happening and Dirac
predicted the human mind would eventually comprehend an "approximation" of what was really going on.
Now we are only scratching the surface and we only get an approximation with these "A" Laws. . But once Milo Wolff's math is further perfected and completely adapted to these "A" Laws then everyone will see that Stephen Wolfram is correct because in the future this will be the basic foundation programming for future super computers. . These future super computers will give humans the exact, accurate answers to all the information they are seeking about the various functions of this vast universe.
One big advantage of using these "A" Laws is that you get none of the various erroneous answers given out by the tensor math of general relativity. . An example is the singularity, which was long considered to be one of these erroneous answers until Stephen Hawking discovered it wasn't.
A problem with present science are all these subset rules and the math that is cooked up for them. . A good example are all these viewpoints or gauges used in quantum mechanics.
Explanation proved that if you were confined to within the parameters of one of these subset rules then there would be no way that you could see it was merely a subset rule and you might even think that what you had was a true law.
Believing these subset rules are laws, is the trap present science has fallen into because this is a frequency universe. . The only math that can possibly work with a universal law is a type of frequency math similar to Milo Wolff's. . All other math can only prove things are subset rules and therefore wrong, not right. . So you know anything that is proven with any other math, than this frequency math, has to be a subset rule and not a true law.
Yes, the people in the quantum field have found out, this is definitely a frequency universe. . Our ancestors, who laid the foundation for our present science didn't know this. . They gave us laws for solids, liguids and gasses, which in fact are merely subset rules and not true laws. . But not to worry. . There's a easy way to understand all this.
You can even understand how general relativity works without knowing any tensor math. . This seems like a lofty statement but it is true. . Not only that but you can also see why general relativity works and even tensor math doesn't show you that.
First of all you have to ask the following question: . Why does the tensor math of general relativity work as well as it does? . There is only one answer to this: . It works because it accurately translates what is happening in other TYPE reference frames (other gauges) to your one, single, subset reference frame. . Or as quantum people would say it allows you to work entirely within one gauge without having to fix another gauge.
A reference frame or a gauge is essentially a view of things in which the combination of space and time (the space time interval)
Explanation remains unchanged. . This allows rules for that particular gauge to be set up. . The rules in that gauge or view will not vary. (local gauge invariance)
You will be forced to set up new rules (fix another gauge) whenever the space time interval changes appreciably. .
Unfortunately our minds were developed in a vast area where the space time interval does not change appreciably. . This is why many of our quantum theorists today do not understand the underlying reason why they must fix these different gauges. . Those, who do not understand that the space time interval changes, will remain in the world of stone age science.
A vast improvement over these gauges used in quantum theory and the tensor math of general relativity are these new "A" Laws. . The math for these new laws is here and being developed. . When perfected this will be the Holy Grail of mathematical science. . But even now these new laws do give you a splendid "big picture" of what is really going on, not only in the macrocosm but in the microcosm as well.
What is now theoretically possible, and someday will be done, is that by using a computer one will be able to look from the viewpoint of any gauge (specific type of reference frame) and have all the other gauges (specific reference frames) accurately mathematically portrayed via the computer. . This will easily be done using these "A" Laws and this new math. . You will understand exactly how this will be done if you take the time to read this rather extensive web page.
Acceptance of these "A" Laws will result in profound and drastic changes in the planning areas of controlled nuclear fusion and space travel.
Special relativity and general relativity are the tools scientists use to show how different observers will see space and time differently. . . Relativity shows us the relationship between space and time. . It shows us that we actually have something called space time. . It also shows us the idea, our ancestors gave us about space and time being entirely different things, is absolutely wrong.
You can see for yourself how life seems only to persist for a fraction of a second at a time. . This is how movies are made using different still shots one after the other but at a certain fixed frequency. . These "A" Laws show us that a similar frequency method is how our own particular space and time is also being produced.
The big problem with our human thinking is that we consider ourselves as existing through time when this is not quite correct. . It is your mind making you believe that you are the same person you were at five years old. . You are not the same person you were at five. . Therefore, you are also not the same person you were a second ago either. . Your components keep changing and this assemblage, that you call you, will last as long as all your components stay perfectly in tune with the surrounding frequency universe.
What type of a surrounding frequency universe is this??
Stay tuned and keep reading.
Fitzpatrick says, "The biggest surprise in the lives of all these quantum people will come when they see what inertia really is. . They will see that inertia has a frequency foundation similar to quantum theory and all this is explained by simply looking at these "A" Laws. . Once any quantum expert sees what causes inertia then he or she will also be astonished at how quantum theory fits so beautifully into the grand master jig saw puzzle of this entire universe."
Michael Faraday, who made the first electric motor
and who gave us our present laws of magnetism, was the first to attempt to unify the invisible fields of gravity and magnetism.
Einstein felt he also could arrive at a unified field theory.
Einstein looked for a simple answer to all these invisible forces.
After I read Fitzpatrick's T.O.E., I saw Einstein was right: . This universe is built on one, solitary, diamond, building block "A" Law concept. . It's so simple that the human mind can easily understand it. . However, using this single basic diamond building block concept, we get various symmetries of construction. . Our present science laws show us only a few of these symmetries or only a few facets of this diamond or only a few subset reference frames or only a few subset gauges.
These "A" Laws show us a gauge (quantum theory) is a specified frequency spin/orbit space time reference frame that is seen and measured by us quite differently, here in our subset, space time reference frame.
You must understand that any information from one gauge (space time reference frame) to another different gauge will become distorted. . Future super computers will resolve all this distortion and as Stephen Wolfram points out, they will tell us what is really going on. . But we don't have these now. . Resolving this distortion and agreeing about what is happening in these other gauges (reference frames) is today's biggest headache.
Once you see the "big picture" then you will see how all the pieces of present science fit into and build this entire universe.
You will then immediately realize that all our present science laws are merely subset rules.
Our present laws of gravity, magnetism, charge and in fact all our mechanical laws are not true laws. . They are merely rules for another subset gauge exactly like in quantum mechanics.
Daniel Fitzpatrick says "We have all this empty space with things spinning and orbiting in it in the microcosm exactly like in the macrocosm. . We must look for other similarities in both, which few present scientists seem to be doing. . Our mistake was in designing separate science laws and math for each, separate symmetry of construction (gauge) and therewith failing to heed Kurt Gödel's warning
about such subset math and science laws" . .
From the point of view handed to us by our ancestors, reality turns out to be even more fantastic then any science fiction tale yet produced.
The force between individual spinning electrons is inversely proportional to the 4th power of the distance between them. . This is showing you the microcosm compression of space time is the square of our space time and helps to explain why (E=MC2). . This is not telling you the microcosm and macrocosm use different laws. . What this is telling you is that the space time
that these entities "see" is not the same space time that you see. . It is an entirely different gauge. . This is more evidence that these "A" Laws are correct and that space time is being produced at various spin/orbit frequencies.
All these different gauges (quantum theory) have local gauge invariance within each gauge. . This is telling you that each of these different gauges also has an invariance of the space time interval within each gauge as well. . In other words, there are different amounts of space time in each different gauge
The different amounts of space time (different space time interval) in these different gauges (reference frames) is responsible for the distortion of information that goes from one gauge to another different gauge.
What changes in the microcosm is the space time interval.
Explanation . Space time in the microcosm is more compressed than our space time. . The microcosm uses the same "A" Laws as the macrocosm.
The scientists of today understand that the quantum world is a frequency world but they simply do not understand that this entire universe is a frequency universe as well. . We humans are no diffrent from a radio set that is tuned to a certain frequency. . We only see the space time generated by certain spin/orbit frequencies that we are tuned to.
If you insist on holding to the present science view of the various individual forces then you will be forever in the dark. . But once you accept this new "A" Law concept then the unification of the invisible forces becomes crystal clear and so easy to see that no math at all is needed for your mind to easily comprehend it.
There are not 4 fundamental forces but only one invisible force (space time) being produced at different spin/orbit frequencies. . General relativity portrays these forces correctly in that these forces are really space time distortions. . The "A" Laws clearly agree with general relativity as they show us that a repelling force is a maximum of space time production and all attractions are really where a minimum of space time is being produced.
Present science tells us we are in an accelerating, expanding universe. . If you want to understand why we have gravity then what is now improperly seen as a red shift type expansion should be correctly viewed as these new "A" Laws show it. . Space time is being constantly created all around us but by a lesser amount between us and the earth thereby attracting us to the earth. . And this is an explanation more in line with what general relativity is telling us.
I'm only a book publisher who knows a bit about the tensor math of general relativity. But, after reading Fitzpatrick's Theory of Everything, I saw this "new kind of science" will be needed to obtain controlled nuclear fusion because surroundings must now enter the picture in a far different manner. I also saw the first reasonable explanation for Perlmutter's acceleration.
And I saw that scientists failed to realize the supreme importance of Kurt Gödel's proof.
A good many scientists do not even know that Gödel's proof applies to all the science laws. . You simply cannot see the "entire truth" from here on earth where you are limited to looking out from this single, subset reference frame.
This T.O.E. book showed me that Einstein undoubtedly would have given us a credible unified field hypothesis had he known about the acceleration that Perlmutter's group recently discovered. But Einstein didn't know about this acceleration that Saul Perlmutter's group found.
He only knew about the perceived expansion of the universe.
Fitzpatrick simply tells us what Einstein would have told us had he known all the facts. Fitzpatrick also gives the quantum world the foundation for GLOBAL gauge invariance where only local gauge invariance has existed.
Explanation And with magnificent insight, Fitzpatrick extends the quantum wave world to the rest of the universe. . Not only that but he says, "We will finally be able to quantize without fixing the gauge, by using Milo Wolff's frequency math together with this new "A" Law concept."
He also says, "Future scientists will demand far more accuracy than this present single reference frame view of science can possibly provide. . They will perfect Milo Wolff's new innovative frequency math.
They will also perfect this new Aufbau or "A" Law multiple reference frame concept of the universe and thereby completely eliminate Heisenberg's uncertainty.
Explanation Read the free T.O.E. e-book to see why. . This WILL provide them super accuracy with future super computers. . This "new kind of science" will also give them a mathematical unification of the forces, Explanation
which is not available now."
Fitzpatrick says, "Einstein gave us the "principle of equivalence",
which is essentially the association of acceleration with gravity. . Einstein also initially gave us his "cosmological constant ",
which is a force exactly equal in strength to gravity but the opposite in that it's a repulsive force between all the stars & galaxies and one could say between all the atoms & molecules as well."
All the universities in the world have completely dismissed this old idea of the cosmological constant put forth by Einstein. . As I write this in the year 2002, few scientists accept this force that Einstein once claimed was equal but opposite to gravity in that it was a repulsive force holding all the stars and galaxies apart. . Now this repulsive force is back in the news again. . Saul Perlmutter says Einstein was right all the time and Einstein did NOT make a big blunder by giving us this opposite force of gravity. . Presently a few scientists have even come forth to challenge present science and say Perlmutter is right.
So if Einstein was right and since we know gravity shows up as an accelerating contraction then won't gravity's equal and opposite force---Einstein's cosmological constant---show up as an accelerating expansion?
If Einstein would have known about this new-found acceleration then he undoubtedly would have connected the dots and he would have seen the association of acceleration not only with gravity but also with---gravity's equal and opposite---this repulsive force as well. Once that's done and one knows about Murray Gell-Mann's
Explanation idea of the quark; Ampere's "A" Laws and Mach's principle
Explanation then one is well on the road to solving the unified field problem.
What present science fails to show us, and what these extremely simple "A" Laws show precisely, is that the electron is a spherical standing wave entity
that behaves, in two ways, identically to the quark, which is also a spherical standing wave entity.
#1. A "locked" in place electron will attract other electrons when the closest sides of each are going in the same direction (magnetism). . The reason the polar attraction is stronger is because the entire portion of both electrons are then moving in the same geodesic path. . The quark behaves the same with other quarks but this quark to quark attraction is much stronger and penetrates much further into the existing universe than any quantum of light because of the higher quark spin frequency.
#2. Both electrons and quarks (and ALL free spherical standing wave entities) have a type of gyroscopic inertia where they precess 90 degrees to any applied force (but in their space time, not ours).
This entire universe is built using nothing but those two aforementioned principles and the "A" Laws.
This universe uses none of our subset, present science rules at all.
The electron and the quark, of course, have different symmetries that come about because of their different construction but this construction is mandated by the different surroundings and our present science totally ignores the effects of these different surroundings. . We know that the gyroscope, Foucault's pendulum,
vibrating elements and Helium 2 all hold to the "fixed stars"
and our present science totally disregards the action of the surroundings in this as well. . Therefore we KNOW our present science is merely one of many subset theories, each seperate theory being used in a different set of surroundings, such as quantum theory, Newton's laws and string theory. . Present science, therefore as a subset theory, becomes subject to Kurt Gödel's proof.
These "A" Laws are NOT subject to Gödel's proof because, unlike present science, they are universal laws that can be used in the microcosm as well as here.
These "A" Laws give you the big picture of what's really going on and they PROVE this universe uses exactly the same principle to build atoms as it does to build galaxies. . It seems unbelievable but we've totally missed it until now. . Our ancestors and then our scientists just didn't hand us the entire big picture of how "everything" really works. But now here's the answer, right in front of you.
Einstein tried to find this one simple principle.
Anyone who has ever worked with quantum theory
knows this is a frequency universe. .
Even Einstein correctly predicted gravity was a wave.
Explanation The proof he was right is in these FREE e-books right here at this web site. But this type of a frequency universe presents a problem to those of us here on earth who must view things from only one reference frame. . We will be forever condemned to viewing this one single principle---that Einstein tried to find---as various distinct, individual, invisible forces. . Read the FREE e-book to see why.
Why didn't anyone see this relatively simple answer to the unification of the invisible forces until now?
Why hasn't any scientist given us the actual reason that we have gravity and all these other invisible forces until now?
This e-book explains more than I ever thought was possible. It really does explain everything. And it must be right. After I read this TOE book by Fitzpatrick, I knew that I had to publicize it and more of his ideas, which are condensed in the following unquoted paragraphs. . I've quoted his exact words. . He said, "Don't worry about plagiarizing me. Do it any way you can so they get the facts". . This long web page is my endeavor.
Yes, I thought to myself, no university even provided the slightest concept of a phonograph before Edison produced one, and none from the university system have even come close to providing anything as brilliant as this astonishingly simple, brand new concept of unification. . The math won't be simple though. . This "new kind of science" is incredible and like Edison's phonograph, not that complicated. . It is truly one of the greatest discoveries in the entire history of mankind. . This, essentially, is what Einstein was trying to find.
General relativity uses complicated tensor math.
This new concept greatly simplifies all this and even shows you why the tensor math of general relativity works. . It works because, unlike in special relativity, the SURROUNDINGS are taken into consideration.
Fitzpatrick---who has many degrees and licenses---facetiously claims he solved this problem mainly because he completely shed all the prejudices of his university training and moved quickly to gain hands on experience in the technical world, particularly in electronics, flying and in troubleshooting complicated jet airliners.
Fitzpatrick said, "While working for Pan Am, I saw that not all these shop specialists did well on the line where one had to know how all these specialized systems intermeshed with each other. . With every black box or part they changed, they also changed their idea of what might be wrong. . I kept changing ideas too until I got all these subset present science
laws rules to mesh and work together."
Tallyho4477 read the book and wrote, "This science is so interesting. . I can't get over the concept. . It is as radical as it is elegant! . I'm sure my brain will now be preoccupied with this for some time to come. . Good show! . Does anybody know of more on this? . I'd like to see and read more of it. . I would like to know how this flies in the community; what they think of it; what they have to say about it."
So would I, tallyho. .. So would I.
This has to be the final answer to unification because not only does it unify the 4 fundamental forces
using an easily understood concept but it unifies ALL the invisible forces including centrifugal force as well. And the most incredible thing about this radically new idea is that you don't need to utilize math to comprehend it. . This makes sense too because the universe doesn't seem to be using any math but the universe does seem to be using one, easy to see, essential principle---throughout---in both the microcosm and the macrocosm. . You do need to know a bit of science to understand Fitzpatrick's book but you do not need to be a math expert: That's what makes this book and this "new kind of science" so fascinating.
"Andre Ampere was a child prodigy who knew all the math of his era by the time he was 12 years old. . He later went on to formulate the first electrical laws but he could not produce the math for his own laws so these "A" Laws were eclipsed by Michael Faraday's laws that Maxwell
provided the math for and which Heinrich Hertz greatly clarified. . Is it possible that our present math is only good in our singular reference frame? . Could it be that we had no math, until recently, for a universal law that would encompass everything? . Did Ampere give us the one simple set of universal laws that---until Milo Wolff's math---we failed to develop any math for? . This seems to be the answer once you completely understand the full significance of Gödel's proof; Ampere's ("A"