http://www.rbduncan.com/contact.html

These books & papers brought to you ** free**
by

*http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ctPyeNZqFho*

Over 4 Decades of Books, Papers and Thoughts of**Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.**

who has not only written some top notch books

but also has
pulled together

--- as MAGPUL sees ---

a great number of
scientific facts that show us

a universe almost no one has even
considered.

If **Dan Fitzpatrick
Jr.** is right then we are in a steady-state
universe

with Einstein's cosmological constant **repulsive force**,
holding everything apart,

and we would not perceive the difference between
this and an __accelerating__, expanding universe.

If there is no
perceived difference between gravity and __acceleration__ then

there is
no perceived difference between the two abovementioned universes
either!

"If the principle of equivalence holds for gravity, then it also
holds

for gravity's equal but opposite **repulsive force** and gravity
becomes

a **bi-polar** force like the other fundamental forces."
**Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.**

"Most of us often encounter **the truth** but
we usually pick ourselves up

and pretend it did not happen." (Winston Churchill)

"The **de Broglie wavelength
formula** shows us the
**blue** shift in the microcosm.

Looking inward (microcosm) everyone agrees this is caused by a

No one has ever claimed this was evidence of

If this analogy is good looking inward to the microcosm

then why isn't it good looking outward to the macrocosm?

It's evidence of gravity's equal but opposite

It's evidence of Einstein's Cosmological Constant."

Everything here is absolutely FREE

And these below are only a small part of the writings of
*D.P.Fitz Jr.** *that we've found and
placed here so far.

Please bear with us: More will be added as they are
located and permission obtained to be added to this ** free** page.

Therefore this page - paid for by

Click links below for things you want:

You'll find most links duplicated in Adobe.pdf

(For instance, here's this page duplicated in Adobe.pdf)

*http://www.rbduncan.com/4.decades.pdf*

Website is at *http://www.rbduncan.com*

Another older website carrying Fitzpatrick's works FREE is: *http://www.rbduncan.com*

Here's a book you can all watch **as it's
being written**: *http://www.rbduncan.com/travel.htm*

*Fitzpatrick's
First Book* There was a ** full** page in
the New York Times devoted exclusively about this book on June 18th 1967.

"Fitzpatrick's First Book" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *pge1.pdf*

Burdines, Bambergers & the **WOR** Radio Station in 1922

June 14th 2020

In 1922 (almost a hundred years ago)

*http://amperefitz.com/burdines.htm*

*http://amperefitz.com/burdines.doc*

*http://amperefitz.com/burdines.pdf*

**'Business as usual'** __ after__ this virus? May 29th 2020

it's War

*http://amperefitz.com/itsWar.htm*

*http://amperefitz.com/itsWar.doc*

*http://amperefitz.com/itsWar.pdf*

NEW! February 9th 2020

Einstein's Unified Field Theory

*Einstein's Theory SOLVED! in Word.doc*

*Einstein's Theory SOLVED! in Adobe.pdf*

December 8th 2019

Only one last page

Even Einstein didn't know how close he was to the answer of his Unified Field Theory when he wrote the following.

"I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics."

. . Albert Einstein

Now in retrospect

here's what we see.

Einstein was quite right when he wrote that **above** in 1954, about a year before he died.

Einstein's teacher, Hermann Minkowski, had already come up with the correct assessment of spacetime and the spacetime interval.

*When we look *through the Hubble telescope* through space, then we are also looking back through time, so it's really ***spacetime**. And IMPORTANT — Einstein saw this **spacetime** was __also__ a repulsive force.

Einstein had seen that Minkowski's spacetime was also related to his (Einstein's) *'Cosmological Constant repulsive force'*, that Einstein knew, and we now know hold all these 5 BASIC spinning things apart in both microcosm and macrocosm, i.e. quarks, electrons, stars, galaxies and superclusters of galaxies.

**Einstein, saw modern physics was wrong**, and should have seen that all he needed was a *simple phase law* (

That's really **ALL** that exists in this spinning microcosm too. What I didn't know at the time was that many others had put forth **relative motion theories** that were all promptly squelched by physicist Robert H. Dicke who claimed gravity could

More than half a century ago there was a good article, in *Scientific American* about Ampère's **1823** Long Wire Law that made me re-think — and suspect even more — everything I had learned in electronics.

In **1823**, André M. Ampère took two batteries and connected each to a long wire, with both wires parallel to each other. When the current went the same direction (in-phase) through both wires, the wires attracted. When Ampère reversed one of the batteries and the current went through the wires in opposite directions (out-of-phase), then the wires repelled each other.

The unit of electrical current, the Amp, was named after Ampère for this __simple__ discovery in **1823** — relating the FORCE **directly** and __ SIMPLY__ to the

This *fundamental* __basic__ **simplicity** of Ampère's **1823** Law — using **NO*** plus or minus charges, or north and south magnetic poles* — is now totally obscured by the more complicated math and rules of the Faraday-Maxwell field theory, coming half a century after Ampère, that __must__ use
**imaginary** *plus and minus charges and north and south poles*.

We have electrons all spinning at the same EXACT frequency. They have two choices: They can either **spin or move** in-phase with each other or **spin or move** out-of-phase with each other. This is where Ampère lucked out. Ampère didn't know about their spin but he made an **1823 law** about their movements showing PARALLEL MOVEMENTS (FLOWS), of electrons, IN THE SAME DIRECTION (in-phase) ATTRACT EACH OTHER.

—and—

PARALLEL FLOWS, of electrons. IN OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS (out-of-phase) REPEL EACH OTHER. Ampère's 1823 Law.

Phase Symmetry attraction is simple:**Quantum coupling** (binding energy) is a spin up

& spin down electron with their closest sides

in-phase, while orientation changes quanta sizes.

These can be close (magnetism) or distant,

thereby producing waves (light, radio etc.).**Superposition** has far, far more binding energy

because both electrons are spinning the same

direction on the same spin axis, keeping BOTH

ENTIRE electrons in-phase with each other.

This type quantum binding has ONE size,

and can be close (magnetism) or distant, but

this type energy is not a general wave producer.

**THINGS in-phase ATTRACT—and—THINGS out-of-phase REPEL.**

** **

**This LAW replaces modern physics !!!**And the country that develops this Phase Symmetry framework first wins BIG.

** **

**And** (what Ampère didn't know) electrons & every other spinning entity from quarks to galactic superclusters whose CLOSEST SIDES MOVE IN THE SAME DIRECTION (in-phase) will ATTRACT each other.

—and—

All spinning entities whose CLOSEST SIDES MOVE in OPPOSITE DIRECTIONS to each other (out-of-phase) will REPEL each other, also is Ampère's 1823 Law.The Marie in André-Marie came from Ampère's mother's name: At that time in France it was a common practice to denote the mother in the child's name.

Ampère gave us this concept that things **in phase** always attract *—* *entanglement — *and things **out of phase** always repel.

He gave us this concept using relative motion rather than phase but it's the same thing really if you analyze it. Use relative motion in your own spacetime realm or lower frequency realms and use phase in higher frequency spacetime realms.

Simply use whichever method makes it clearer to you.

We've shown, in the prelude, that even Albert Einstein *—* *a year before he died — *considered the concept of fields to be a ** bad concept**.

Yet most items on the internet will show magnetic **fields **being associated with what Ampère discovered. **Forget FIELDS**: **Ampère's 1823 long wire discovery** had __nothing__ in it about magnetic fields. **Forget** his later laws incorporating magnetism in 1827.

Field theory was mainly England's great gift to us. Today's enhanced **field concept** came from Faraday and Maxwell, and as Einstein shows us, it turned out to be a **bad mistake**.

** Field** theory may explain repulsive force space, but it blinds us to the TRUE attractive forces that are

Ampère didn't know about electrons but he did know something in his wires were moving so he gave us a system of laws that have ** nothing to do with MAGNETIC fields**.

**This below **essentially

1. Long parallel wires having things in them moving the same direction caused the wires to attract.

2. But if things in one wire moved one way and in the other parallel wire they moved the opposite way then this caused the wires to repel.

Then he gave us a bit of math for various angles if the wires *—* *in which these things above were moving — *were not exactly parallel.

And this gives us by far our best observance at how those things inside the wires *—* *electrons — *are behaving in relation to one another. This tells us essentially the idea of plus and minus __charge__**is wrong** because these electrons do not **always repel** each other. Regularly, like in Ampere's long wires, they attract each other.

In **all** cases, * phase* is a better concept to use than

Absolutely correct in **all** cases, Ampère's * phase* concept also shows you which way the electron spins. When you see the much more highly complicated Faraday-Maxwell concept doesn't, then it's simple to know which concept to use.

Ampere didn't know these things as electrons but now we think we know a bit more about them.

These are essentially Ampère's Relative Motion Laws: *Ampere's Laws* *http://www.rbduncan.com/Ampere*

or *Aufbau Laws* *http://www.rbduncan.com/aufbaulaws.htm*

or *http://www.rbduncan.com/theALaws.htm* *http://www.rbduncan.com/theALaws.htm*

or *Relative Motion Law* *http://www.amperefitz.com/lawrm.htm*

or *Gold Universal particle relative motion law* *http://www.amperefitz.com/plawrm.htm*

These are also **phase laws** with which all the forces can be unified: *http://www.amperefitz.com/aphaseuniverse.htm**.*

Why only a few of us see this today, is something that I still can't figure out!

I began to see this *simple* **relative motion law** in the early 1940s when my father bought, and let me use his 20,000 ohms per volt, volt-ohmmeter, and this **relative motion** concept really grew more intense, in my mind, in the mid 1940s when my father and I went halves in buying a war surplus Sherman Tank radio transmitter-receiver, for $79.95 from Gimbals Department Store in New York, and got it working by using two car batteries to give us 12 volts to drive the units' power supply generators. These two batteries we charged with a rectified & filtered 2 amps, using a war surplus 12 volt *'*** rectifilter'**, which supplied enough current to recharge the batteries but had not quite enough current capacity to run the transmitter-receivers' power supply generators directly by itself.

I had assembled a pretty good picture of how a *simple* **relative motion law** was working in the microcosm by 1965, while working for Pan American Airlines, in the Radio Department, using my U.S. 1st Class Radio License with RADAR Endorsement #P1-7-4087.

**This meant reverting back to** Ampère's *simple* ORIGINAL **relative motion law** of 1823, and disregarding ALL later laws using fields & charges, which even includes Ampère's later laws.

It was **crystal clear** to me then, that there was __only__ **ONE** *simple* **relative motion **rule for **ALL** these forces in our universe. In fact, I was solving more radio problems using that one rule than using all the garbage beliefs of charge, magnetism and field theory, that I knew by then could not possibly exist. In fact, they obscure us in seeing the actual attractive and repulsive forces.

I wrote a 64 page book about this *simple* **relative motion law** in 1966. *Fitzpatrick's First Book (Click Link)* There was a **full page** about it on page 29 of the June 18, 1967 Sunday, New York Times Book Review section.

In my 87th year on this earth, I've managed to convince quite a few people, around the world, that this is what is really happening, but **it's hard to change established religious beliefs**, and that's exactly what today's modern physics is. Even Einstein saw that in 1954.

While we cannot obtain a Unified Field Theory, we can obtain a *working* **relative motion law** by substituting speed for voltage and mass for current in Ampère's Law. We now have the computing capacity to give ourselves a *working* **relative motion law****.** This may sound impossible but this actually can be done today. I've done all I could putting many of its foundation stones in place. See *http://www.rbduncan.com* **and also read 4 decades of my papers FREE by clicking***45 Years of Putting this Jigsaw Puzzle together - of unifying Gravity with all the other forces*

Science will make one huge quantum leap once this is done.

**Here's how it's done**:

When you are measuring amps, you are really measuring the **quantity** of electrons passing your measuring point. In the macrocosm you use the same **amount** of energy, passing your measuring point, with its force falling off at the 'square of the distance' just the same as in Ampère's original 1823 Law.

The problem comes with voltage.* ***We see it as pressure**. However, we can't measure

SPEED is something we certainly can measure in the macrocosm.

So, what does this tell you?

It tells you the answer Einstein was trying to find with his Unified Field Theory — and with SIMPLER MATH too.

**What we are unifying are ALL the FORCES**. We are unifying

**What can't be unified** are the spacetime realms produced by the **different frequency** spins of spinning quarks, electrons, stars, galaxies and galactic super-clusters: their spins are all **at a different frequency**. THEY ARE

Our very concepts of LARGE & *small* are derived from a frequency, resonance world we know nothing about.

The quark spins at a resonance of AT LEAST 20 billion times FASTER than the electron, yet this super-high resonance attracts the electron & builds molecules AND gives us our concepts of LARGE & *small*.

We see these faster spinning things (higher spin frequencies) as *small*, and the slower spinning things (lower spin frequencies) as LARGE.

Even though this seems incomprehensible, it's a fact! And you will have UNIFICATION now because as you start using Ampère's Law for all this, then you will understand EXACTLY WHAT CAUSES SPACE & TIME (spacetime).

This is something you don't know now.

We have many spacetime realms but 5 BASIC spin frequency spacetime realms: quark, electron, star, galaxy and galactic super-cluster.

The electron is the only one of those above 5 spinning entities that has the same EXACT spin frequency for all electrons, making the *same EXACT spacetime realm* for all electrons.

Each of the above 5 BASIC spinning entities — *spinning in all directions, mostly out-of-phase with each other* — are producing —

These are the only 5 BASIC spinning entities we know about, but **MODERN PHYSICS**, unfortunately, allows infinitely larger accumulations than galactic super-clusters and infinitely smaller building blocks than quarks.

*Einstein had put most of this picture of our universe together when he warned us about modern physics in 1954.*

**WE ARE IN A FREQUENCY UNIVERSE — not only in the microcosm — BUT ALL THROUGHOUT — hard even to imagine!**

*Make no mistake about that!*

We have limits in our spacetime realm. But does this spin frequency universe have a limit in spin frequencies either higher or lower? Does this universe have a limit of these spinning entities being too small or too large?

Ampère's *simple* **relative motion law** of 1823 solves that problem as well: IT GIVES US A LIMITED UNIVERSE! WHY?

Because it shows us conclusively that this is a universe that is FOLDED BACK ON ITSELF!

Because gravity, *and inertia*, acting * at least* 20 billion times FASTER than the speed of light shows us the vast distance that the quark spin is effective.

Then how much more effective is a smaller, **even higher frequency**, FASTER SPINNING building block particle of the quark going to be? It's effective distance will extend even further than the quark's spin frequency!

This is __ how__ this UNIVERSE GETS FOLDED BACK ON ITSELF!

This answers one of our biggest science/physics problems: it gets FOLDED BACK because the higher quark and **faster**, SMALLER, *shorter* spin frequencies can __penetrate__ the LARGE amount of space produced by the **slower** spinning galaxies & galactic super-clusters whose slow spin frequencies produce LARGER, *longer* waves that, in turn, PRODUCE — *less time* — but SO MUCH more SPACE!

Some similar entity exists between spinning electrons as it does between spinning galaxies: it's simply the RATIO of space to time in each that is DIFFERENT!

There is more TIME than SPACE between electrons than there is between galaxies, but SOME ENTITY between these different spacetime gauges is giving this ENTIRE spinning UNIVERSE a certain BALANCE.

**1.** Now we must ask ourselves an important question: If we are, indeed, in such a frequency universe as this, then could our concepts of **large** and **small** be WAVELENGTH concepts? Faster spinning, higher frequency (smaller WAVELENGTH) spinning entities seem to be smaller, and slower spinning, lower frequency (larger WAVELENGTH) spinning entities seem to be larger.

**2.** Could our two concepts of **space** and **time** be erroneous concepts? Relativity scientists see this repulsive force as **ONE** thing, i. e. (Einstein's Cosmological Constant), or Minkowski's spacetime.

I've been asking myself those two questions (in the above paragraphs **1.** and **2.**) for a good many years now.

I've made considerable progress in answering these two questions in paragraphs **1.** and **2.** in the following links below.

Last, but not least, we solve even __ more__ of Niels Bohr's Complementarity Problem, because we see how an electron,

Precession, with each revolution — **over a long period of time** — results in a perfectly round PARTICLE or Dr. Milo Wolff's spinning, SCALAR, standing wave.

Therefore, a **tremendously longer period of TIME (**

We only know the binding speed of two of these: electrons bind together at the speed of light, and quarks bind together at, *or more than*, 20 billion times the speed of light (2x10^{10c}). *vanFlandern*

Quark (gravitational) radiation is also at, or more than 2x10^{10c} in **velocity**, and in a similar neighborhood of 2x10^{10}, of the electron, in energy and __higher__ frequencies.

A subtantial amount of quark radiation, in supernovae, results in a substantial amount of electron (light) radiation: in a hypernova — * and in beams of Quasar energy* — it's probably more like 99.x% of quark radiation to the resulting amount of electron radiation given off.

All of these spinning entities, in our universe seek stability. Perfect stability would be achieved when the binding energy to the surroundings equaled the binding energy inside the spinning entity (PARTICLE) itself.

Future super-computers will prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that stability is achieved in these different space/motion ratios (gauges) when —* a similar balancing entity *— exists between ** all** these spinning entities from quarks to super clusters,

Today, this ** balancing method, in the SPACE between these different gauges — IS THE ONLY THING — that IS quantified **(throughout our entire universe)

"Gauge invariance" can only mean ONE THING: area that has the SAME space/time (space/motion) RATIO.

Relativity, *or relationship*, of spin frequencies becomes of supreme importance.

Now — * between the spacetime realms of the electron and stars* — we insert another

This is correct, and as Stephen Wolfram has warned us — * we need a MODEL for this BEFORE WE DO ANY MATH* — yet modern physics has established itself as a true religion when it is only a mixture of mathematical rules that seem to work OK in our particular subset space/time gauge. A few of us have now given you the foundation stones for the correct BALANCED spin-orbit MODEL that really works all throughout this universe. Stay on this track.

We wouldn't even be here if this universe was perfectly balanced: fission and fusion energy results from our microcosm seeking better stability via **IMPROVED BALANCING** by converting both larger and smaller elements into iron or elements closer to iron.

Atomic power stems from a *drastic* space/time RATIO change: here's the best non-mathematical explanation.

If the term "gauge" refers to a specific space/motion ratio, then the hydrogen bomb is stronger than the old atomic fission bomb because the gauge change to our gauge is more severe: the uranium or heavier element electrons involved are going far slower around the nucleus — *closer to our gauge* — than the inner hydrogen electrons.

Now you have some TRUE facts and the **WHY** for the Big Bang.

Thanks for reading this.

Electricians and radio people understand the importance of PHASE in regard to FORCE. I guess it was beneath the dignity of all the theoretical physicists, so far, to even consider the PHASE aspect of any unified force theory.

And many sought to unify spacetime realms that simply can't be unified. Einstein was so close! If he had worked in early radio, instead of the Swiss Patent Office, would he have gotten it? It's an incredible story: Einstein completed 99% of what was needed but missed unification by a hair.

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.

**I cannot teach anybody anything.I can only make them think.**

(Click a **Scalar*** link* below for # **1.** Answer.

**SCALAR** in htm: - *http://rbduncan.com/scalar.htm*

Also, **SCALAR** in Word: - *http://rbduncan.com/scalar.doc*

And **SCALAR** in Adobe pdf: - *http://rbduncan.com/scalar.pdf*

**Without** this new knowledge of Ampère's *simple* **relative motion law** of 1823, modern physics has become so dysfunctional that **it cannot tell us what causes Dark Matter. **Fixing that dysfunction is the challenge at hand. Change begins with understanding, and I wrote WIMPs to provide some. It also partially answers the question in paragraph **2.**, giving you a good idea of what's really going on.

(Click a **WIMPs*** link* below.)

**WIMPs** in html: - http://rbduncan.com/WIMPs.html

Also, **WIMPs** in Word: - *http://rbduncan.com/WIMPs.doc*

And **WIMPs** in Adobe pdf: - *http://rbduncan.com/WIMPs.pdf*

April 30 2019

Newton took this knowledge, and with his invention of calculus plus a tremendous amount of more effort, published in 1687, the phenomenal fact that the speed of gravitational attraction had to be instantaneous.

**NASA** — before the moon shot — re-checked and found the speed of gravity — was either Newton's instantly or **at least** 20 billion times the speed of light (2x10^{10c}). *Van Flandern*

I have shown that the * particle* giving us Earth's gravity and inertia must be spinning

If you want to learn more, then read **SCALAR**, which gives us the SCALAR concept of **NASA** scientist Dr. Milo Wolff, who helped get us to the moon: quarks, electrons, planets, stars, ~~galaxies~~ and ~~super clusters~~ (of galaxies) are all Wolff's SCALAR resonances.

I **crossed out two** we don't see as SCALAR. We see galaxies as flat and *frozen in time*. We fail to see galaxies and super-clusters as spherical type SCALAR entities because the time-span of humans is far too short to witness the complete cycle of gyro precessing that will eventually turn galaxies and super-clusters into more spherical type SCALAR entities.

Most do not yet see that **all** of these SCALAR spinning entities essentially behave the same way in each of their own different spin frequency spacetime realms, but they do, and this is the big science revelation. It drastically changes and SIMPLIFIES modern physics!

**SCALAR** in htm: - *http://rbduncan.com/scalar.htm*

Also, **SCALAR** in Word: - *http://rbduncan.com/scalar.doc*

And **SCALAR** in Adobe pdf: - *http://rbduncan.com/scalar.pdf*

**SCALAR**, proves Einstein was right in his 1954 warning to us about field theory and **modern physics** when he said, "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of **modern physics**."

You will see Wolff's SCALAR concept is the very antithesis of spacetime, giving us a simplification of our entire universe that today's science **can't**.

If any of your work seems to correlate to my findings then please write to me at:

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Apt. 329

Belmont Village

4310 Bee Cave Road

West Lake Hills, TX 78746

Send me your e-mail.

April 30 2019 - SCALAR - U. S. Govt. Copyright version:

**SCALAR.cpyR** in htm: - *http://rbduncan.com/scalar.cpyR.htm*

Also, **SCALAR.cpyR** in Word: - *http://rbduncan.com/scalar.cpyR.doc*

And **SCALAR.cpyR** in Adobe pdf: - *http://rbduncan.com/scalar.cpyR.pdf*

February/10/2019 **ELECTRON SPIN PRECESSION**

**made SIMPLER ** & more.

**Electron spin Precession** in htm: - *http://rbduncan.com/espinp.htm*

Also, **El. spin Precession** in Word: - *http://rbduncan.com/espinp.doc*

And **E. spin Precession** in Adobe pdf: - *http://rbduncan.com/espinp.pdf*

January/28/2019 a few TRUE science **CONCEPTS**

will **NEVER** die.

**concepts** in htm: - *http://rbduncan.com/concepts.htm*

Also, **concepts** in Word: - *http://rbduncan.com/concepts.doc*

And **concepts** in Adobe pdf: - *http://rbduncan.com/concepts.pdf*

Forces in the electrical world are derived from **PHASE**.

And **now we know**

**ALL Fundamental Forces** are derived from **PHASE** between spin frequencies in ** both** microcosm and macrocosm (Ampère's Law).

It's

**Fundamental Forces** in htm: - *http://rbduncan.com/simple.htm*

Also, **Fundamental Forces** in Word: - *http://rbduncan.com/simple.doc*

And **Fundamental Forces** in Adobe pdf: - *http://rbduncan.com/simple.pdf*

October-29-2018
Exactly HOW **FIELD THEORIES** obscured and HID the FUNDAMENTAL FORCES from us!

HOW the mathematical complexities of FIELD THEORIES obscure & hide both attractive and repulsive FUNDAMENTAL FORCES.

This may be hard to believe. **Here it is!**

How Field Theories HID the TRUTH: *http://rbduncan.com/fieldtheory.html*

How Field Theories HID the TRUTH: in Word*http://rbduncan.com/fieldtheory.doc*

How Field Theories HID the TRUTH in Adobe pdf: *http://rbduncan.com/fieldtheory.pdf*

October-3-2018
THREE (3) **Important** Science CHANGES are COMING!

Albert Einstein, Stephen Hawking and numerable theoretical physicists searched for a **simplification** of this entire complicated universe.

This may be hard to believe. **Here it is!**

Modern SCIENCE changed in htm: *http://rbduncan.com/3beliefs.htm*

Modern SCIENCE changed in Word: *http://rbduncan.com/3beliefs.doc*

Modern SCIENCE changed in Adobe pdf: *http://rbduncan.com/3beliefs.pdf*

7-10-2018
The **Answer** to the way this __entire__ universe is built — is this one, simple building principle!

Why didn't we see this Answer???

Answer to Everything in htm: *http://rbduncan.com/answer.htm*

Answer to Everything in Word: *http://rbduncan.com/answer.doc*

Answer to Everything in Adobe pdf: *http://rbduncan.com/answer.pdf*

7-7-2018
**Why Gyroscopes defy Gravity.**

Here's one on July 7th 2018 WHY gyroscopes defy gravity.

gyroscope in html: *http://rbduncan.com/gyroscope.html*

gyroscope in Word: *http://rbduncan.com/gyroscope.doc*

gyroscope in Adobe pdf: *http://rbduncan.com/gyroscope.pdf*

7-1-2018
**By Popular Demand - a SHORT one only on COLORS**

Here's one on July 1st 2018 with **ONLY** a most interesting dissertation on EXACTLY how the cones in our eyes see ** COLORS.**

COLORS in html: *http://rbduncan.com/colors.html*

COLORS in Word: *http://rbduncan.com/colors.doc*

COLORS in Adobe pdf: *http://rbduncan.com/colors.pdf*

6-12-2018
**Here's a Mistake in the Britannica**

Here's one on June 12th 2018 telling about a Britannica mistake, but half way through is a most interesting dissertation on how our eyes see** COLORS.**

Britannica Mistake in html: *http://rbduncan.com/britannica.html*

Britannica Mistake in Word: *http://rbduncan.com/britannica.doc*

Britannica Mistake in Adobe pdf: *http://rbduncan.com/britannica.pdf*

5-25-2018
**Here's a simple explanation of SPACETIME**

* Spacetime greatly simplified.pdf*

*Spacetime greatly simplified.doc*

4-11-2018
**Michael Crichton wrote * The Andromeda Strain* and *Jurassic
Park*, **

*
Crichton's most astounding revelation.pdf*

*Crichton's most astounding revelation.doc*

11-25-2017
"**You cannot square a speed**.", said noted scientist Tom Van Flandern.
Here's a short mathematical PROOF that Van Flandern's statement is correct.

*c.squared.pdf* (in Adobe)

*c.squared.doc* (in Word)

1/3rd.
SHORTER **EXPANDING UNIVERSE** 11-23-2017 a ** PROOF **that if this
universe is expanding, then Inertia will be decreasing because Inertia is a
connection to ALL the surrounding stars.

*1/3rd. SHORTER EXPANDING
UNIVERSE 11-23-2017 - PROOF Inertia will be decreasing in an
expanding universe.htm *

1/3rd. SHORTER **EXPANDING UNIVERSE** __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *1/3rd. SHORTER EXPANDING UNIVERSE 11-23-2017 - PROOF
Inertia will be decreasing in an expanding universe.pdf*

This
**EXPANDING UNIVERSE** 11-20-2017 a ** PROOF **that if this universe
is expanding, then Inertia will be decreasing because Inertia is a connection to
ALL the surrounding stars.

**EXPANDING UNIVERSE**
11-20-2017 - ** PROOF **Inertia will be decreasing in an expanding
universe.htm

In Word: **EXPANDING UNIVERSE** 11-20-2017 - ** PROOF **Inertia will
be decreasing in an expanding universe.doc

This **EXPANDING UNIVERSE** __also__ in Adobe.pdf - **EXPANDING UNIVERSE** 11-20-2017 - ** PROOF **Inertia will
be decreasing in an expanding universe.pdf

**VERY
LATEST IN SCIENCE:** Unlike Gravity, DARK MATTER does
** not** bend light in the same manner.

*7-7-2017.A bit of light on DARK
MATTER.htm *

**A bit of light on DARK MATTER:** the various DARK MATTER frequencies are
far too low to bend light the same way as inertial mass.

In Word: *7-7-2017.A bit of light on DARK MATTER.doc *

DARK MATTER __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *7-7-2017.A bit of light on DARK MATTER.pdf*

*Completing
Quantum Theory.htm 1-30-2017 *

*light.on.Everything.htm 1-30-2017 *

*Cause of
Energy?.htm 1-29-2017 *

*Is it Field or
Quantum Theory?.htm 1-28-2017 *

*Do we have an
expanding universe?.htm 1-26-2017 *

*Standing
waves are secret to Dark Matter.htm 1-24-2017 *

*The TOP
Science rule in our Universe.htm 8-18-2016 *

**Best kept SECRET is the TOP SCIENCE RULE.**

In Word: *The
TOP Science rule in our Universe.doc 8-18-2016 *

TOP Science Rule is: 8-18-2016 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *TOP Science Rule
is: 8-18-2016.pdf*

*How the price of
GOLD changed in my lifetime. 7-11-2016 *

*Einstein versus Quantum Theory. 1-9-2016 *

**BOTH OF THESE SHOW - for the first time - WHAT A QUANTUM OF STRONG FORCE
ENERGY IS.**

Einstein versus Quantum Theory. 1-9-2016 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Einstein
versus Quantum Theory. 1-9-2016.pdf*

*All
the Forces are now unified with this new PHASE concept. 1-1-2016
*This, our most popular e-book, is being read by THOUSANDS every
month !!! Yes, it's long but it's easy to understand and there is no math. And
here it's FREE !!!**In this crystal clear, easy to
read, very important e-book you will see exactly why Einstein's Unified Field
Theory will never be accomplished, while right now ALL the forces are actually
unified already via a simple PHASE law.**

All the Forces are now
unified with this new PHASE concept. 1-1-2016 __also__** for the FIRST
TIME** in Adobe.pdf - *All the
Forces are now unified with this new PHASE concept.
1-1-2016.pdf*

*Bohr's
Complementarity. 12-1-2015 *

Bohr's Complementarity. 12-1-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Bohr's
Complementarity. 12-1-2015.pdf*

Accretion Disks. 11-19-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Accretion
Disks. 11-19-2015.pdf*

*The Delft
Experiment. 10-24-2015 *

The Delft Experiment. 10-24-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *The Delft Experiment.
10-24-2015.pdf*

*Minkowski's light cone -- What it is. 10-16-2015 (We greatly simplify
the light cone.)*

Minkowski's light cone -- What it is. 10-16-2015 **(The light cone greatly
simplified.)** __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Minkowski's
light cone -- What it is. 10-16-2015.pdf*

*A
bit of light on Everything. 10-04-2015 (With white background--can be
printed.)*

A bit of light on Everything. 10-04-2015 **(With white background--can be
printed.)** __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *A bit
of light on Everything. 10-04-2015.pdf*

*A bit
of light on Everything. 10-03-2015*

A bit of light on Everything. 10-03-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *A bit of
light on Everything. 10-03-2015.pdf*

*Einstein
said quantum theory was not complete. 09-17-2015*

Einstein said quantum theory was not complete. 09-17-2015 __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *Einstein said quantum theory was not complete.
09-17-2015.pdf*

*Dr. Milo
Wolff proves electron is a standing wave. 07-26-2015*

Dr. Milo Wolff proves electron is a scalar, spinning, standing wave.
06-09-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Dr. Milo Wolff
proves electron is a standing wave. 07-26-2015.pdf*

YOU and your money 06-09-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *YOU and your money
06-09-2015.pdf*

*Quark
Quantum Entanglement is the basis for Inertia, Gravity and atomic forces
05-18-2015*

Quark Quantum Entanglement is the basis for Inertia, Gravity and atomic
forces 05-18-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Quark Quantum
Entanglement is the basis for Inertia, Gravity and atomic forces
05-18-2015.pdf*

*gluons &
Quantum Entanglement 04-30-2015*

gluons & Quantum Entanglement 04-30-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *gluons & Quantum
Entanglement.pdf*

*21
centimeter radiation & Quantum Entanglement 03-27-2015*

21 centimeter radiation 03-27-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *21.cm.radiation & Quantum Entanglement.pdf*

*It's
space-time, not simply space. 02-02-2015*

It's space-time, not simply space. 02-02-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *space.time.pdf*

*Why instant
starlight from distant stars 01-21-2015*

Why instant starlight from distant stars 01-21-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf
- *sp.time.pdf*

*Force
Carrying Particles 01-18-2015*

Force Carrying Particles 01-18-2015 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *forcecp.pdf*

**How**
and** WHY** General Relativity & Quantum Theory works.
11-19-2014

**How** and **WHY** General Relativity & Quantum Theory works.
11-19-2014 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *whyGR.pdf*

*Ebola &
Europe's banks. 10-17-2014*

Ebola & Europe's banks. 10-17-2014 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *ebola.pdf*

*The
Continuum Hypothesis is relevant to our universe too.
9-29-2014*

The Continuum Hypothesis is relevant to our universe too. 9-29-2014
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *continuum.pdf*

*Quanta is derived from spacetime. 5-11-2014*

Quanta is derived from spacetime. 5-11-2014 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *spacetime.quanta.pdf*

*"You
can't square a speed." noted Astronomer Tom Van Flandern
5-09-2014*

"Can't square a speed" Tom Van F. 5-09-2014 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *speed.squared.pdf*

*SPIN is
caused by PHASE. 4-28-2014*

Spin is caused by PHASE. 4-28-2014 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *phase.spin.pdf*

*That
Missing Boeing 777. 3-29-2014*

That Missing Boeing 777. 3-29-2014 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *missing777.pdf*

*Phase
symmetry makes quantum theory more complete. 12-02-2013*

Phase symmetry makes quantum theory more complete. 12-02-2013 __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *phase.symmetry.pdf*

*Nature developed superheterodyne before Armstrong.
12-01-2013*

Nature developed superheterodyne before Armstrong. 12-01-2013 __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *a.better.ending.pdf*

*Here's why we have Plancks constant. 11-28-2013*

Here's why we have Plancks constant. 11-28-2013 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *plancks.constant.pdf*

*Scientific
American disputes supersymmetry. 11-17-2013*

Scientific American disputes supersymmetry. 11-17-2013 __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *diode.pdf*

*10th
chapter of Elaborate Design of our Universe. 7-07-2013*

10th Chapter of Elaborate Design of our Universe. 7-07-2013 __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *10th.chapt.pdf*

*Just back from
SHILO battleground. 5-27-2013*

Just back from SHILO battleground. 5-27-2013 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *shilo.pdf*

*New light
on the Elaborate Design of this Universe. 5-21-2013*

New light on the Elaborate Design of this Universe. 5-21-2013 __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *elabdesign.pdf*

*Gravity
Waves sought by Andrew Geraci. 5-18-2013*

Gravity Waves sought by Andrew Geraci. 5-18-2013 __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*GravityWaves.pdf*

*Dark
Matter -- Dark Energy. 5-04-2013*

Dark Matter -- Dark Energy. 5-04-2013 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *DarkMatter.pdf*

*Electron Spin
Enigma. 4-07-2013*

Electron Spin Enigma. 4-07-2013 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *enigma.pdf*

*A new
look at DARK MATTER. 4-04-2013*

A new look at DARK MATTER. 4-04-2013 __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *carl.scheider.pdf*

*LOGIC
doesn't exist unless you know EXACTLY what Space and Time really are.
3-22-2013*

LOGIC doesn't exist unless you know EXACTLY what Space and Time really are.
3-22-2013" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *spacetimelogic.pdf*

*The GOD
PARTICLE from CERN. 3-16-2013*

" The **GOD PARTICLE** from CERN. 3-16-2013" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *godp.pdf*

*A New
Extraordinary Kind of Science. 3-08-2013*

"A New Extraordinary Kind of Science. 3-08-2013" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*NewEKS.pdf*

*QUARKS may be
doing more than we think. + Why Fission, Fusion & the Periodic Table.
2-28-2013*

"QUARKS may be doing more than we think. + Why Fission, Fusion & the
Periodic Table.2-28-2013" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *dquark.pdf*

"QUARK SPIN causes what? 8-20-2012" *quarkspin.htm*

__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *quarkspin.pdf*

"We know this is a frequency world in the microcosm but is it a frequency
universe in the **macrocosm** as well?" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *die.ordnung.pdf*

"While Einstein's Unification of the Fields may not be possible, a
Unification of the GAUGES has already taken place giving us a **never before
seen universe**." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *ssswr.pdf*

*Sigma
Bond strengths in the microcosm. *

"Sigma Bond strengths in the microcosm."__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *bond.strengths.pdf*

*While the
electron spin causes magnetism, GRAVITY & INERTIA are caused by the QUARK
SPIN. *

"While the electron spin causes magnetism, GRAVITY & INERTIA are caused
by the QUARK SPIN." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *quarkspin.pdf*

a look at the money supply" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *kissinger.pdf*

*45 Years of
Putting this Jigsaw Puzzle together - of unifying Gravity with all the other
forces*

45 Years of Putting this Jigsaw Puzzle together - of unifying Gravity with
all the other forces" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *45years.pdf*

*It's all nothing
but RELATIVE MOTION !!!*

"Ampere showed us, it's all nothing but RELATIVE MOTION !!!" (science) e-book
by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Amp.pdf*

**The next three books are three of the best books ever written about aviation
& war torn Ireland in the 1960s:**

*"Sean"* (How Ireland & England were seen
in the 1960s) - e-book by Fitzpatrick (in ordinary html)

"Sean" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *sean.pdf*

*"Caribbean"* - e-book by Fitzpatrick - An
airline grows larger. (in ordinary html)

"Caribbean" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *caribbean.pdf*

*"The
Troubles"* - e-book by Fitzpatrick - Fact mixed with
fiction about the illegal IRA in Ireland. in ordinary html)

"The Troubles" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *troubles.pdf*

LIGHTNING & modern AIRLINERS __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *ac-light.pdf*

"PROFILE of Fitzpatrick" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *DPFJrs.profile.pdf*

"Determining latitude at sea" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *latitude.at.sea.pdf*

*"Ampere's
Long Wire Law is a fact!"*

"Ampere's Long Wire Law is a fact!" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *question.pdf*

*"ABSTRACT of
scalar, standing wave concept"*

"ABSTRACT of scalar, standing wave concept" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*abstract.pdf*

*"Affenstall Science Christmas Message"*

"Affenstall Science Christmas Message" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *affenstall.pdf*

*"A Quark
message no one is heeding!"*

"An important Quark message no one is heeding!" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*quarkmspin.pdf*

*"Dan
Fitzpatrick comments on Theoretical Physicist Mendel Sachs'
Beliefs"*

"Dan Fitzpatrick comments on Theoretical Physicist Mendel Sachs' Beliefs"
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *answers.to.mendel.pdf*

*Why we have general relativity or why mass increases with
speed.*

"Why we have general relativity or why mass increases with speed."
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *why.general.relativity.pdf*

*Fitz
answers some Scalar Wave questions.*

"Fitz answers some Scalar Wave questions." __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*26nov2006.pdf*

*http://rbduncan.com/gold1.html**
*

"More wave and scalar wave questions answered by Fitzpatrick" __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *http://rbduncan.com/gold1.pdf*

*Learning radio
in high school - written to George*

"High School Memories" written to George__ also__ in Adobe.pdf - *togeorge.pdf*

*"It's about
Chemistry, Ron . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"It's about Chemistry, Ron . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *chemistry.pdf*

*Later years -
written to Delphine*

"Moved to Tennessee & Eifel Tower" - written to Delphine __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *delphine.pdf*

grinch.htm A true story of the Grinch who stole Christmas - by Fitzpatrick (in html)

A true story of the Grinch who stole Christmas - by Fitzpatrick __also__
in Adobe.pdf - *grinch.pdf*

*Will Osama bin
Laden become another Joan of Arc?*

"Will Osama bin Laden become another Joan of Arc?" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*joan-d-arc.pdf*

*Terrorists are most
probably at work destroying America's infastructure right
now!*

"Terrorists are most probably at work destroying America's infastructure
right now!" - by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *bridge.pdf*

*Lite Flite
Manual* EASY Computer flying with DVD (html)

"EASY Computer flying with DVD " - by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*start.easy.DVD.computer.flying.pdf*

Newton & Einstein only gave us HALF the story.

"And Hubble warned us this was NOT an expanding universe." __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *hubbles.warning.pdf*

"Ampere really gave us this Relative Motion Law in 1825 for things he knew
were moving in the wire (electrons)." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *relMlaw.pdf*

*basic
physics problems* Fitz talks about some basic
problems in physics. (html)

"Fitz talks about some basic problems in physics." - by Fitzpatrick
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *basic.physics.problems.pdf*

The __four__ following SUNDIAL items - now FREE here - were formerly
advertised in Popular Mechanics and shipped all over the world by
Fitzpatrick.

**TO SAVE TIME AND MONEY** this chart below is a **MUST HAVE** pasted on the wall if you work with **both inch and metric tools**.

*FREE !!!
e-mail THOUSANDS of ANIMATIONS (for my grandchildren and you)
*

*"1966 while working
for Pan American World Airways" by Fitzpatrick*

"1966 while working for Pan American World Airways" by Fitzpatrick
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *pan-am.pdf*

*QUICK version of
Ampere's Laws. *

QUICK version of Ampere's Laws. __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *quick.ver.amperes.laws.pdf*

*Two
magnets will show you more than thousands of books. *

Two magnets will show you more than thousands of books. __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *two-magnets.pdf*

*Little Known
Facts about Well known science Terms*

"Little Known Facts about Well known science Terms" (science) e-book by
Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *ffacts.pdf*

*It all begins with
this all important science law.*

"It all begins with this all important science law." __also__ in Adobe.pdf
- *law-rm.pdf*

*Why A.G. Lisi's E8 model
may show us what our Time and Space really are*

"Lisi's E8 model seems to show us why we get space & time!" - by
Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *lisi's-E8-model.pdf*

*Why A. Garrett
Lisi's Model is so important*

"Why Garrett Lisi's Model is so important" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*lisi-important.pdf*

*Frank Mackinson
showed me the importance of Lisi's e8 model. *

Frank Mackinson showed me the importance of Lisi's e8 model. __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *frank.mackinson.e8.pdf*

"What Dr. Milo Wolff says connects with what A. G. Lisi is showing."
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *a.g.lisi.pdf*

*A radioman sees
us all as radios. *

A radioman sees us all as radios tuned in to this universe. __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *tuned.in.pdf*

*Caroline
Thompson - WHEN DID YOU PUBLISH THIS?. *

WHEN DID YOU PUBLISH "Out-of-phase waves give us space and repulsive force."
Caroline? __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *4apr04caroline.pdf*

But then Caroline - from Cambridge - repudiated what she had discovered: one
of the most important scientific discoveries EVER MADE! Incredible! Simply
Incredible! __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Carolines.pdf*

"Why we have GRAVITY." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *why.we.have.gravity.pdf*

*"Speed of
Gravity is 9x10 ^{16} meters per second."*

"Speed of Gravity is 9x10^{16} meters per second." __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *Gspeed.pdf*

*Einstein's Principle of Equivalence or why gravity acts like
acceleration.*

"Einstein's Principle of Equivalence or why gravity acts like acceleration."
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *principle.of.equivalence.pdf*

*Is Saul
Perlmutter explaining the reason for us having the principle of equivalence?
*

Is Saul Perlmutter explaining the reason for us having the principle of
equivalence? __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *saul.perlmutter.
explaining.pdf*

*QED - Feynman's
Strange Theory of Light and Matter*

"Feynman's Strange Theory of Light and Matter" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*feynmans-QED.pdf*

*Understanding the
Binding Energy Curve*

"It's understanding the Binding Energy Curve" says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *b.e.curve.pdf*

*Energy cannot
be lost. It can only be shifted via binding energy.*

"All energy is a form of binding energy." (science) e-letter by Fitzpatrick
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *oct1a06.pdf*

*Shedding light on Energy Quanta*

"Shedding light on Energy Quanta" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *letter_july2003.pdf*

*"The
Complete Binding Energy Model" *

"The Complete Binding Energy Model" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *binding-energy-model.pdf*

TOP SPOT in Google __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *top.spot.pdf*

*Phase
Coherence and the Inverse Square law*

Phase Coherence and the Inverse Square law __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*phase-coherence.pdf*

"Fitz finds a FACT": Phase Coherence is the reason for the binding attractive
force in ALL the 4 fundamental forces __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *fitz.finds.pdf*

"to Brian: Phase Coherence is the reason for the binding attractive force in
ALL the 4 fundamental forces." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *to-brian-milo.wolff.pdf*

*Click
this to see WHY this is a phase universe of quantum sized
pieces.*

Click the following pdf link to see WHY this is a phase universe.__also__
in Adobe.pdf - *phase-universe.pdf*

"Scalar phase relationship" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *intv.pdf*

"Wave and Scalar Wave facts" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *w&scalar.wave.facts.pdf*

Schrödinger's Universe __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *schrod.pdf*

*Extra -
Extra Short Theory of Everything: *

Extra - Extra Short ToE __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *exexshorttoe.pdf*

*"Short Theory of
Everything" by Fitzpatrick*

"Short Theory of Everything" - by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*shrttoe.pdf*

*TOEbyFitzpatrick.htm* A "Theory of Everything"
by Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr. (in html)

"Theory of Everything" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *toe.by.fitzpatrick.pdf*

*Universities
Asleep at the Switch* is a quantum physics e-book (in
ordinary html)

*Universities Asleep at the Switch* __also__ in Adobe.pdf - http://www.rbduncan.com/ua_20071020_ck_ds_jm_ds.pdf

Fixing the Gauge means LIMITING the extent of that particular space-time
realm!. __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *you.cannot.quantize.without.fixing.the.gauge.pdf*

Fitzpatrick's USR Laws. __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Fitzpatrick's.USR.Laws.pdf*

*Do we now have
a Relative Motion type "Theory of Everything"?*

Do we now have a Relative Motion type "Theory of Everything"? __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *maylttr.pdf*

*"The Invisible Forces"
- - an e-book by Fitzpatrick*

"The Invisible Forces" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *invisible-forces.pdf*

"Beta Decay BIG BANG" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *big-bang.pdf*

*"A New Science Tool"
(science) e-book by Fitzpatrick*

"A New Science Tool" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf
- *mybook.pdf*

*"CAMBRIDGE
Theory of Everything" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick*

"CAMBRIDGE Theory of Everything" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *cambridge.toe.pdf*

*Ampere's Universal
Particle/Motion Law*

"Ampere's Universal Particle/Motion Law" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *ampere.pdf*

*"Too many spacetime realms for a mathematical Theory of Everything" says
Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"Too many spacetime realms for a __mathematical__ Theory of Everything"
says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *too.many.spacetime.realms.pdf*

*"What is a Wave
Front?" By Fitz posted all over the net via
healththyself.*

"What is a Wave Front?" (science) e-letter by Fitzpatrick posted everywhere.
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *wf.pdf*

*Sigma and Pi
Chemifcal Bonding Forces similar to Magnetism?*

"Sigma and Pi Chemifcal Bonding Forces similar to Magnetism?" (science)
e-book by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *sigma.pi.pdf*

*Dr. Milo Wolff &
Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. talk.*

"Dr. Milo Wolff & Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. talk." __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*milo.pdf*

*Dr. Milo Wolff's Wave
Structure of Matter*

"Dr. Milo Wolff's Wave Structure of Matter" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*lets-look-at.milo.wolffs.wave.structure.of.matter.pdf*

*Dr. Milo
Wolff answers some Scalar Wave questions asked by
Fitzpatrick*

"Dr. Milo Wolff answers some Scalar Wave questions asked by Fitzpatrick"
(science) e-letter by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *oct1a06.pdf*

*Understanding Dr.
Milo Wolff's Scalar Standing Wave.*

"Understanding Dr. Milo Wolff's Scalar Standing Wave." __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *milo.wolffs-scalar.wave.pdf*

"And I agree with Milo about this too" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Yes, Milo, Mach's principle
is indeed awesome!.pdf*

"The Milo Wolff - Albert Einstein model of the universe." __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *wolffeinstein.pdf*

*Dr. Milo Wolff's
Wavelength Density formula*

"Dr. Milo Wolff's Wavelength Density formula" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*wave.density.formula.pdf*

*Talking to Dr. Milo
Wolff about the "Wave Structure of Matter" - - by
Fitzpatrick*

Talking to Dr. Milo Wolff about the "Wave Structure of Matter" - - by
Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *frfmw.pdf*

*"Milo Wolff said
& I agree . . ." *

"Milo Wolff said & I agree . . ." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *mws.pdf*

*"Milo Wolff
sees the Einstein picture." *

"Milo Wolff sees the Einstein picture." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *einstein-milo.wolff.pdf*

*"Milo
Wolff & W. Gilmour discuss wave density"*

"Milo Wolff & W. Gilmour discuss wave density" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*wolff-gilmour.pdf*

"Milo Wolff e-mail" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *mwemail.pdf*

*One - Two --
Three --- General Relativity*

"One - Two -- Three --- General Relativity" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*1.2.3.general.relativity.pdf*

*Understanding the Standing Wave aspect of Space &
Time*

"Understanding the Standing Wave aspect of Space & Time" (science)
e-letter by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *stwaveaspect.pdf*

*Euclidean
geometric motion used by Newton*

"Euclidean geometric motion used by Newton" (science) e-book by Fitzpatrick
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *motion.pdf*

*Comprehending
Spin and Isospin*

"Understanding Spin and Isospin." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *isospin.pdf*

*Why the Strong
force acts in this manner . . . *

"Yes, the Strong force acts in this manner . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *strF.pdf*

*"A NEW Cosmology .
. . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"A NEW Cosmology . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*fitzcos.pdf*

*Why we fail
to see spin conservation in the quark realm (QCD)*

"Quark spin is not conserved? - - Whoops!" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*quarkspin.pdf*

*Why NASA
tells us we have 72% Dark Energy, 23% Dark Matter and 4.6%
Atoms.*

"Why NASA tells us we have 72% Dark Energy, 23% Dark Matter and 4.6% Atoms"
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *dark-energy.pdf*

*From where do we
get the quantity c squared?*

"From where do we get the quantity c squared?" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*c-squared.pdf*

"Mass to Charge ratio" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *me.pdf*

*Unified Field
Laws (in Germany known as the aufbau laws)*

"Unified Field Laws or German Aufbau laws" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*aufbaulws.pdf*

*Universal Quantum
Coupling concept*

"Universal Quantum Coupling" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *fuqcc.pdf*

*Resonances or
Translational Motion*

"You must be aware of the translational motion in all of this." __also__
in Adobe.pdf - *sue.pdf*

*Dan Fitzpatrick
& mathematical physicist Tony Bermanseder*

"More from Tony Bermanseder about quarks." __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*Bermanseder on
quarks.pdf*

"Time Dilation." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *timeDL.pdf*

*Quantum
theory vs General Relativity. It's the Complementarity
Principle!*

"Quantum theory vs General Relativity" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *letter_dec2003.pdf*

*Einstein's Cosmological constant -- repulsive
force*

"Einstein's Cosmological constant" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *einsteins-cosmological.constant.pdf*

*Why the
quarks have assymptotic freedom. *

"Why the quarks have assymptotic freedom." __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*assymptotic.freedom.constant.pdf*

*Accelerating, expanding universe*

"Accelerating, expanding universe" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *accelerating.expanding.universe.pdf*

*Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything*

"Not Quite Everything for a Theory of Everything" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*not.quite.pdf*

*Shades of
Einstein & Fred Hoyle*

"Shades of Einstein & Fred Hoyle" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *einstein.hoyle.pdf*

*Einstein's Biggest Blunder -- Wasn't?*

"Einstein's Biggest Blunder -- Wasn't?" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *einsteins.blunder.pdf*

*Bose
Einstein Condensate is proof this is a frequency
universe.*

"Bose Einstein Condensate is proof this is a frequency universe." __also__
in Adobe.pdf - *bose.einstein.pdf*

*Electrons
normally repel BUT when they attract other electrons, it's always this way . . .
*

"Electrons normally repel BUT . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *plawrm.pdf*

*Vector - Scalar
relationship between Force, Space and Time*

"Vector - Scalar relationship between Force, Space and Time" __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *vs-rel.pdf*

*CAUTION using the
DeBroglie wavelength formula*

"CAUTION using the DeBroglie wavelength formula!" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*deBroglie-wavelength-formula.pdf*

"Why do we have 3D Space-Time?" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *why-3D-space.time.pdf*

"A Simple Program" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *pnks.pdf*

*Steven Wolfram wants
a reasonable notion of Space and Time*

"Steven Wolfram wants a reasonable notion of Space and Time" __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *nks.pdf*

*Determining
mass via Scattering*

"Determining mass via Scattering" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *quark.mass.pdf*

*REPLY to Dave Bacon
in "The Quantum Pontif" *

REPLY to Dave Bacon in "The Quantum Pontif" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*dbakn.pdf*

*ELECTRONS are
fermions but not when paired spin up-spin down so this pair acts like a
boson.*

ELECTRONS are fermions but not when paired spin up-spin down" __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *fermion-boson.pdf*

*Consider this
possibility of Time & Space*

"Consider this possibility of Time & Space" __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*time-space.pdf*

"OLD web site statistics" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *old.web.site.statistics.pdf*

*We are tuned into
this universe like a superheterodyne radio.*

"We are tuned into this universe like a superheterodyne radio." __also__
in Adobe.pdf - *tuned.into.this universe.pdf*

"The "A" Laws" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *the-A-laws.pdf*

*R.T. Cahill's
Quantum Foam theory *

"Cahill's Quantum Foam theory" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *cahill.pdf*

*The importance of SCALAR
waves*

"The importance of SCALAR waves" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *importance.of.scalar.waves.pdf*

"Aufbau Laws" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *aufbaulaws.pdf*

*Fitzpatrick's letter
to Charles Scott*

"Fitzpatrick's letter to Charles Scott" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *letter.to.charles.scott.pdf*

*"Lost in
Translation" by Fitzpatrick*

"Lost in Translation" by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *lost-in-trans.pdf*

"Limits to Logic" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *limits.to.logic.pdf*

"More of Fitzpatrick's letters" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *more.pdf*

*3D plus Time -
Caveat! by Fitzpatrick*

"3D plus Time - Caveat!" by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *3d-caveat.pdf*

"Photon" by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *photon.pdf*

Click the following pdf link to see what a PHOTON really is: __Now__ in
Adobe.pdf - *phton.pdf*

*"Relative
Motion Theory" by Fitzpatrick*

"Relative Motion Theory" by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *relative-motion-theory.pdf*

*Einstein's
most important Discovery*

Einstein's most important Discovery __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *einstein-important.pdf*

"Fitzpatrick's view" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *fview.pdf*

Expanding Universe Religion" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *expand.pdf*

Houtman's findings __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *houtman.pdf*

This universe is an Aether Universe that can be quantized into a phase
universe of quanta chunks of Aether. __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *an-aether-universe.pdf*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/scalarwu.htm*

"It's a Scalar, Standing Wave Universe!" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *scalarwu.pdf*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/swright.htm*

"Stephen Wolfram is absolutely RIGHT and Freeman Dyson is WRONG!" __also__
in Adobe.pdf - *swright.pdf*

*"I was somewhat wrong
on this one . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"I was somewhat wrong on this one . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *wrong.pdf*

*"Our natural laws"
- Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"Our natural laws" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *our.natural.laws.pdf*

*"Shedding
light on energy quanta" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"Shedding light on energy quanta " - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *our.letterjun2003.pdf*

*"Standard Model
concept of the particle" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"Standard Model concept of the particle" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *Standard.Model.concept.of.the.particle.pdf*

*"Quantum
mechanics-General.Relativity&Entanglement" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.
*

"Our natural laws" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Quantum
mechanics-General.Relativity&Entanglement.pdf*

*"Itzhak Bars is
correct!" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"Itzhak Bars is correct!" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*Itzhak.Bars.is.correct.pdf*

*"electron
and its spin are both separate scalar, standing wave frequencies" - Dan
Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"electron and its spin are both separate scalar, standing wave frequencies" -
Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *electron.and.spin.are both.scalar.pdf*

*"This universe is a
quantum computer!" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"This universe is a quantum computer!" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in
Adobe.pdf - *quantumcomputer.pdf*

Changes to "Universities Asleep at the Switch" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *changes.pdf*

Look how many "back to the original manucript" changes - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *changes.to.sean.pdf*

*I thanked
brannenworks for this concept!. *

I thanked brannenworks for this important concept! __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*brannenworks.thanks.pdf*

*"page 2 of 2 pages" -
Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. *

"page 2 of two pages" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*page2.of.2.pages.pdf*

*"Page 8" of 21 pages -
by Fitzpatrick*

"page 8 of 21 pages" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*page8.of.21.pages.pdf*

*"PAGE 5" of 15 pages
- by Fitzpatrick*

"page 5 of 15 pages" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*page5.of.15.pages.pdf*

*"Page 16" of 21 pages
- by Fitzpatrick*

"page 16 of 21 pages" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*page16.of.21.pages.pdf*

*"Page 7" of 7 pages-
by Fitzpatrick*

"page 7 of 7 pages" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*page7.of.7.pages.pdf*

"Why it's space-time and not space or time separately." - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *interval5.pdf*

"A new unification concept." - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*CONCEPT.pdf*

*To the TOE group
about Saul Perlmutter's (Einstein's) Cosmological
Constant*

To the Theory of everything Group - "Einstein's Coswmological Constant." -
Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *togroup.pdf*

*c &
c ^{2} are scalar, standing wave PERIODS!*

"c & c^{2} are scalar, standing wave PERIODS!" 9/13/2004 - Dan
Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *9-13-2004.pdf*

*Einstein, Podolsky,
Rosen (EPR) 3/4/2004*

"Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (EPR)" 3/4/2004 - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__
in Adobe.pdf - *3-4-2004.pdf*

"My life in Miami, Milo" - Dan Fitzpatrick Jr. __also__ in Adobe.pdf -
*my.life.milo.pdf*

"Best e-mail sources in 2004" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *email-2004-sources.pdf*

*"Started my flying
in a piper cub." *

"Started my flying in a piper cub." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *mystart.pdf*

"it causes time." __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *cause.of.time.pdf*

*"In the
quantum world, frequency and energy end up the same, Caroline."
*

"In the quantum world, frequency and energy end up the same, Caroline."
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *frequency.and.energy.end up.the.same.caroline.pdf*

STEADY STATE ** now:** Einstein's cosmological constant force equals

*http://www.rbduncan.com/binary.htm**
*Binary Stars act exactly like Electrons.

*http://rbduncan.com/boson+.htm**
*Bosons?

*http://www.rbduncan.com/letter_june2004.htm**
*Newton and Einstein only gave us HALF the story.

*http://rbduncan.com/Gspeed.htm**
*"Speed of Gravity is 9x10^{16} meters per second."

*http://rbduncan.com/plawrm.htm**
*"Electrons normally repel BUT . . . " says Dan Fitzpatrick Jr.

*http://www.rbduncan.com/xxxSEAN.htm*

"xzx Sean" (Original with all the sex still in it.) - by Fitzpatrick
__also__ in Adobe.pdf - *xzx.sean.pdf*

*Basic geometric spin
properties*

*Sol Eisenberg gives
us a solution*

*"Out of phase and IN
phase resonances by Fitzpatrick*

*Dr. Milo Wolff and
Fitzpatrick*

*Quantum Relativity by
Tony Bermanseder*

*"PAGE 4 of 15 pages
- by Fitzpatrick*

*"Page 4" of 21 pages -
by Fitzpatrick*

*720 degree
Quantum Wave Rotation*

*"Ampere's Laws"
in Finnish by Fitzpatrick*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/astrampfitz.htm*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/toe.htm*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/mbooks.html*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/BOOKS.htm**
*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/nks1.htm*

*Google is
censoring in China but . . .*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/interval.htm*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/interval2.htm*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/interval3.htm*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/speed.of.light.htm** *

*http://www.rbduncan.com/TB.htm**
*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/ampere.htm*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/sola.htm*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/solai.htm*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/gr&qm&e*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/letterjuly2004**
*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/a15.htm*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/theALaws.htm*

*http://www.rbduncan.com/08elec.htm*

Here's some you can read if you ever get to Washington, DC

Registered in the Copyright Office:

**Sean** *Effective Registration Date:* 5-31-1996 TXu
742-876

**The Everything Principle** 7-10-1996 TXu 749-852

**Fitzpatrick's HOE** 5-15-1997 TXu 795-371 HARMONIC Theory of Everything Written for my friend Dr. Peter J.
Wojtowicz a half century later after he taught me how to play chess in
1947.

**T.O.E. Theory of Everything** 9-02-1997 TXu 815-035

**Caribbean** 9-29-1997 TXu 817-016

**ToE Theory of Everything** 11-24-1997 TX4-674-587

**A Concise Theory of Everything** 11-04-1998
TX4-886-754

**A Cambridge Theory of Everything** 1-12-1999
TX4-915-412

**A Simple Theory of Everything **8-28-2000 TX5-258-046

How the rbduncan web page has grown over the years:

*Original
web page: September 2001.**June 1,
2002.**June 2,
2002.**June 6,
2002.**June 7,
2002.**June 8,
2002.**June 21,
2002.**June 24,
2002.**July 10,
2002.**July 19,
2002.**August 24,
2002.**September 26,
2002.**October 10,
2002.**December 20,
2002.**March 3,
2003.**June 8,
2003.**September
19, 2003.**January 25,
2004.**April 17,
2004.**August 8,
2004.**March 15,
2005.**September-3,
2005.**October 7,
2006.**November 10,
2006.**February 8,
2007.*

*World Scientist Database - - Daniel P. Fitzpatrick
Jr.*