Click on any of the blue links to get what you want.
Fly faster with a Microsoft Flight CD using this handy Lite-Flite Manual that prints out on both sides of 2 sheets of paper. . You also make a Miami to Bimini flight. . Lite-Flite Manual
For Patty Wagstaff's airplanes. . Click Here
Air Wise. . Air Travel Info
Photovault.com. . Aircraft Carrier
Aviation Top 100. . Click Here
Most Popular FREE Music-Movie Download Site. . Kazaa
FREE easy icon maker-generator site. . Favicon UK
Corrupt DLL files will cause Explorer 6, now and then, to give you an error message, wiping out open internet programs
Repair these this way:
1. Close down Explorer by clicking "disconnect" on your internet hookup.
2. Go to Control Panel and double click the ADD/Remove Programs icon.
3. Scroll down the list and double click "Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 and Internet Tools"
4. You will then see three options: Put the dot in the "REPAIR Internet Explorer" circle option.
5. Click on OK and then "YES" on dialog box that appears and wait a few seconds until the graph shows you the repair is complete.
Alternate Key Codes List of
NASDAQ Market & Newa
Best IRAQ WAR coverage MSNBC Newa
Iraqi Information Minister
FREE Online Doctor Click Here
Health Services INFO CAPHIS
45 sites--all kinds of E-MAIL CARDS Click Here
For the Guinness List of World Records Click This
World Time Zones Check B4 you chat
Want Microsoft UPDATES for any Windows computer? Click This
For the most popular net downloads Click Here
A few more very popular net downloads Click Here
Over 20 million people use this protective download: ZoneAlarm
Scan your computer for a virus. Click Here
More DOWNLOADS Many - Click This
Find a person or a Firm in the U.S. AnyWho
Find that special person anywhere.
You do have to jump through some hoops to get it FREE but at least these do offer you a FREE choice.
Totally Free personals
Like You too
Address of Love
Blue Couch Cafe
A Relationship TEST
ZIP Code look up: ZIP Code
Get the accurate time: World Clock
Want to see a cool clock?. .
Those with Yahoo e-mail should click "Account Info"
It's at the top of the Yahoo Groups page right under the ad.
You will have to re-enter your password. .
Then scroll down and click "Edit your marketing preferences".
You will then see 13 places that you might want to change to NO and two spots under telephone and mail where you may want to check the NO boxes.
What's your car worth? Kelley Blue Book
National road closure info. Gov/traffic info
For a money exchange rate computer Click This
For Genealogy's 100 TOP Surname Search Sites . Click This
For pure searching, get the Google tool bar. . Click Here
For more searches & other links. . Cool Web Links
For Malcolm MacFarlane's Gaelic Dictionary. . Click Here
To translate something. . SYSTRAN
The following scientists have made gigantic contributions to science. . Further on in this web page I'll be discussing a bit about each of these scientists and why their work is so important. . What they say supports what Fitzpatrick says in his TOE e-books that I added to this server in June of 2002.
For Stephen Hawking's singularity. . Click Here
For Milo Wolff's Quantum Science Corner. . Click Here
Saul Perlmutter's Supernova Cosmology Project. . Click Here
Theoretical physicist Stephen Wolfram. . Official Web Page
They generate tons of debris through which one must search, in order to find a miniscule amount of something of value" . . D. P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
Hammel's Physics & Math links. . Click Here
To get Earth & Sky. . Click Here
U.S. Naval Observatory. . Sun & Moon
National Weather Service. . Site Map
National Weather Service. . ALL
Weather Satellite. . Infrared
NASA. . Lift Off
Metric Converter. . allmath.com
Science conversion calculators. . L-39 Jet
How Stuff Works. . Click Here & learn
HAVING TROUBLE COPYING news articles to groups or e-mail???
SOLUTION: Copy article first to Word or Works---copy prevention code will be lost---then re-copy to groups or e-mail.
Thousands of GIFs (animations) you can copy & paste.
Todd's Web GIFs
Great GIFs Galore
Todd's Motorcycle GIFs
Planet II's Cupboard
SakuraDreams & more GIFs
41 sites with GIFs
Sites with GIFs
Groups with GIFs
Spots with GIFs
More spots with GIFs
More Sites with GIFs
Other Groups with GIFs
Other Sites with GIFs
Other Spots with GIFs
Places with GIFs
More FREE books & software. .
Theory of Everything
Want to get rid of those annoying pop up ads?
These were recommended by Stewart Cheifet on Computer Chronicles. . The red Ad-Aware icon is always on my desktop. . A FREE one in each of these is offered and all are good and they update themselves automatically. . Sometimes I use Ad-Aware and Naviscope together. . It depends on who is ahead in this unending war between the spammers and these spam killing software makers. . I know of no problems with Ad-Aware but I do know that I can NOT e-mail to msn groups with Naviscope installed. .
This --new-- "Pop Up Stopper" is the most positive ad stopper because it simply prevents any new windows being opened automatically but once it's installed, you will continually be hitting the CTRL button to get extra windows opened.
So use the ones that conflict the least with the way you work.
Easy to use Pop up Ad Killer (Ad-aware)
Advanced Ad Killer & more (Naviscope)
(--NEW--) Pop Up Stopper
Close top advertising window to get this one.
Comments or complaints about anything on this site???
post to: Robert B. Duncan
© 2001, RB Duncan Press, All Rights Reserved
Site Design by
Page Design Studio
If you have any interest in science then read this following web page. . It eliminates tons of garbage and greatly simplifies science. . It will put you a quantum leap ahead of the pack in understanding relativity and quantum mechanics.
In less than a year there were more than a Quarter of a Million accesses to this site & over a Million by April 23rd, 2003.
Click for Web Page Data
Bill Gates is working on "Longhorn",
which will greatly simplify computers.
Daniel P. Fitzpatrick's Theory of Everything is the "Longhorn" of science. . It greatly simplifies science. .
Using these simple Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws, you can actually understand how everything in this universe works including special relativity (easiest to learn) and general relativity (hardest to learn).
These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws lead us directly to Milo Wolff's concept, which in Wolff's words is "a proposal that was popular sixty years ago among the pioneers of quantum theory: namely that matter consisted of wave structures in space. Thus, it was proposed that matter substance, mass and charge, did not exist but were properties of the wave structure. Wyle, Schroedinger, Clifford, and Einstein were among those who believed that particles were a wave structure. Their belief was consistent with quantum theory, since the mathematics of quantum theory does not depend on the existence of particle substance or charge substance. In short, they proposed that quantum waves are real and mass/charge were mere appearances; 'Schaumkommen' in the words of Schroedinger. The reality of quantum waves, as suggested by Cramer (1986), supports the original concept of W. K. Clifford (1876) that all matter is simply 'undulations in the fabric of space'."
There's a renewal of interest in W. K. Clifford's concept now.
These simple "A" Laws show us that the abovementioned concept is probably true. . These Aufbau (Construction) Laws or "A" Laws show us how an entire universe could be constructed from nothing but spherical standing wave entities.
And this evidently is Milo Wolff's opinion as well because he shows that particles can be formed by scalar quantum waves combining to form a standing wave
Tallyho4477 read Dan Fitzpatrick's e-book and wrote, "This science is so interesting. . I can't get over the concept. . It is as radical as it is elegant! . I'm sure my brain will now be preoccupied with this for some time to come. . Good show! . Does anybody know of more on this? . I'd like to see and read more of it. . I would like to know how this flies in the community; what they think of it; what they have to say about it."
So would I, tallyho. .. So would I.
Explanation was one scientist with all the tools, who knew and argued with Einstein, but who specifically ruled out the correct answer because he listened to his peers when he should have looked at the evidence that was all around him. . This is a spin/orbit frequency, "tuned circuit" universe and we are tuned to this wave universe much the same as a superheterodyne radio. . All repelling forces can be seen as maximum space-time creations or as a (high impedance) parallel tuned circuit with entities moving on geodesics 180 degrees out of phase with each other. . All attractive forces, such as gravity, can be viewed as a minimum of space-time creation or as a (low impedance) series tuned circuit with entities moving on geodesics in phase with each other." . . D. P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
Milo Wolff says, "The dual particle/wave nature of the electron has long been a paradox in physics. It is now seen that the electron consists entirely of a structure of spherical waves whose behavior creates their particle-like appearance. The correctness of this structure is supported by the physical laws which originate from this wave structure, including quantum theory, special relativity, electric force, gravity, and magnetism. This type of structure is termed a Space Resonance."
The Aufbau Laws show us that ALL permanent entities are also space resonances (spherical standing waves). . Furthermore these Aufbau Laws show us that different type entities are merely space resonances at different frequencies.
Here's what this, essentially, is all about:
Science depends on having standard units of time, mass and length. . Einstein showed us, unfortunately, that this standard was in trouble because these units seemed to vary. . Fitzpatrick's 1967 Laws --- now the "A" Laws show us the universe itself does indeed standardize units of time, mass and length but only within designated spin/orbit frequency parameters. . By also standardizing time, mass and length at each spin/orbit frequency --- instead of arbitrarily fixing the gauge --- future super computers will be able to exactly copy this example and mathematically unify the four fundamental forces to a precision undreamed of.
These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws keep things simple, therefore they obey the principle of "Occam's Razor".
Explanation . Present science is anything but simple.
Fitzpatrick shows us that --- by using a single reference frame view --- present science is forced into this complexity.
The Achilles heel of our present science is its single, subset reference frame viewpoint. . While this simplifies the math, it also obfuscates the correct frequency viewpoint.
Fitzpatrick says, "The victory of present science's mathematical achievements, using a single reference frame, is a Pyrrhic victory because it has obscured the very universal laws that enable us to easily see what is really going on in this universe.".
The single reference frame idea would be fine providing all reference frames were exactly the same but they are NOT. . They are only the same in special situations where speed, mass and surroundings remain essentially unchanged.
General Relativity has proven that when speed and/or mass changes then the amount of space-time also changes and this makes various different reference frames seem to act differently --- sometimes quite differently.
And if you insist on viewing everything ONLY from your own reference frame, as present science insists on doing, then you most certainly will not see how this entire universe is functioning.
In its present form this Aufbau concept is like a slide rule that gives you a fast approximation of the same results that general relativity gives you. . Not only that, but unbelievably, it works in the microcosm as well as in the macrocosm. . It may turn out to be as close to Einstein's unobtained unified field theory
Explanation as scientists will ever perfect. . It does indeed unify the four fundamental forces.
Of extreme importance is the recently discovered ACCELERATION of this expanding universe
Explanation and Einstein's "cosmological constant"
Explanation which this discovered acceleration necessitates. . Keep reading this web page for Fitzpatrick's crystal clear, SENSIBLE answer to this perplexing enigma.
Present science is correct if you want to view everything from a single reference frame but present science does indeed restrict your view to a single, subset reference frame. . These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws do NOT.
We've known, for almost a hundred years, that in the microcosm, frequencies are of paramount importance. . These easy to use Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws show us that this is a frequency universe, not only in the microcosm but all throughout this universe. . This is something we seem to have entirely missed.
Quantum scientists have learned that in such a frequency universe you cannot quantize without fixing the gauge.
Explanation . The rest of the scientific world, unfortunately, hasn't learned that yet.
What this means is that our view of things from here, on this earth, is merely a subset view and all our precious science laws are merely subset rules that only work within certain parameters (gauge)
Explanation. . For instance, these Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws solve one of our biggest gravitational problems. . They do this by showing us that our law of gravity is merely a subset rule and that gravity will only be a constant force within certain parameters (gauge) inside our Milky Way galaxy. . More about this later.
Positive proof of the validity of these Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws is the electron orientation in both sigma and pi types of chemical bonding. (Read the FREE e-books.).
"A New Kind of Science"
is the name of the latest & best selling science book written by theoretical physicist Stephen Wolfram
. He claims, with future computers, we will find a simple & obvious answer as to how this universe really works. But the present math and science has been of little use in this quest. Stephen Wolfram says we need "a New Kind of Science ".
All things built with Tinker Toys will have a certain symmetry of construction. . Things built with Lego Blocks will have a different symmetry of construction. . Humans live in a universe built essentially from point sized quarks and electrons. . We have discovered some aspects of this quark-electron symmetry of construction and mistakenly labeled some of these subset rules as universal laws. . Present science is really nothing more than the total collection of all these subset rules and the sundry math methods matched to them.
We can develop various types of math to match all the various subset rules handed to us by our ancestors. . This is precisely what modern day scientists have been busy doing.
Because present science has made impressive accomplishments, this old bureaucratic university system is seen as the ultimate authority. . People --- even top scientists --- simply will not question the supreme authority. . The evidence of how this universe really works is all around us, yet few will question any old scientific beliefs. . Few will look at any evidence contrary to established beliefs. . You will see a good example of this as we look at the cause of magnetism shortly.
In the future, giant super computers will be set up to work out exactly how all these spherical standing wave, point sized quarks and electrons actually build our universe. . The frequency aspect of it is so complicated that no human mind can possibly understand it. . This is why Stephen Wolfram is correct when he tells us that we will learn how everything works from future super computers.
Even before these future, giant super computers show us, these "A" Laws presently show us the end results of what this myriad mixture of waves actually produces.
Prevalent today is our ancestor's view, in a slightly modified form, that present science gives us from a single, subset reference frame. . The view of present science is really only an approximation of what's going on frequency wise. . It's a good enough approximation if you don't want to look too far from your own reference frame. . However, these "A" Laws, will give you the best approximation if you want to view how things are working in all the different TYPES of reference frames (different GAUGES
Explanation) throughout this entire universe.
Stop for a moment and think. . If this universe is really a frequency universe all throughout, then we have yet to find out what all these terms such as motion, distance, speed, acceleration, larger and smaller really mean in terms of this frequency universe.
Stop once more and think again. . If all the various particles in this universe are really spherical standing waves (space resonances), as quantum science has proven, then we should see ways in which all these spherical standing wave particles act similarly --- and we do. . But you'll have to keep reading to find this.
Stop for a third time and think about these waves because if everything however small is made from waves then there can be no such thing as the smallest particle and what you have instead is a universe composed of a frequency spectrum of infinite span.
You will also have spherical standing wave entities (space resonances) at regular intervals like keys on a piano with a keyboard of infinite length.
Before you say NO to this, you will find --- if you keep reading --- that if this is indeed such an infinite frequency universe then all our present problems, handed to us by our present science, get suitably solved.
Within this infinite frequency spectrum is this particular quark-electron subharmonic frequency --- OUR WORLD --- from which we discern certain spherical standing wave entities as solids. . But quantum mechanics has shown they are really waves. . With this Aufbau Law or "A" Law concept you can easily visualize these spherical standing wave entities (space resonances) acting as BOTH waves and particles.
You will never understand how this entire universe works unless you can see things as BOTH waves and particles. . This new Aufbau Law or "A" Law concept is the only method by which entities can be easily viewed as BOTH waves and particles (space resonances). . Present science fails in this respect.
What both Stephen Wolfram and Daniel P. Fitzpatrick see is that our present science is nothing more than a vast collection of subset rules matched to various types of math. . These two scientists seem to be the very first people to realize that future super computers, programmed with a completely revised "New Kind of Science", will be the tools necessary for us to get an accurate picture of what is really going on in this universe.
Yes, our present science gives us all the math to tell us exactly how much attraction we are going to have with magnetism or with gravity. . But present science fails to tell us exactly why the spinning electron
gives us this invisible force of magnetism or why a preponderance of mass gives this invisible force of gravity.
Your mind has two easy ways to view this frequency universe. . Either the present science view from a single subset reference frame or this "A" Law view. . You lose things and gain things with both views.
These two views are entirely different, widely divergent views. . But BOTH views are needed for the human mind to properly understand this entire universe
In the quantum world the standard model
leaves a lot to be desired. . Also this present science offers no explanation as to why we are forced to use relativity corrections (even in GPS).
And since it offers no answer as to why we have gravity or any of the other invisible forces then what both Stephen Wolfram and Daniel Fitzpatrick point out becomes extremely important.
I wrote this web page as an introduction to Fitzpatrick's e-books. . I know this is a lengthy web page but in the past decades Fitzpatrick has written far more than the few books herein displayed. . This long web page emphasizes some of the more important ideas in those other publications that you cannot get here. . So, in addition to these few e-books that you can get here, I believe this protracted offering of mine is also well worth reading.
How does Nobel Prize winner John F. Nash's concept of "equilibrium"
Explanation also show us why all these atoms and stars stay separated?
You'll have to read through this lengthy dissertation to see why.
This web page is indeed a long, detailed presentation. . But unlike most scientific journals, this is sprinkled throughout with surprises. . So it's far less boring than most things printed up by a university press. . It's also seasoned with a few authentic scientific firsts, which should appeal to those with such specialized tastes.
Lincoln Barnett, who was a friend of Einstein, wrote the best seller "The Universe and Dr. Einstein
" Explanation and he wrote numerous articles on relativity for the Britannica. . Lincoln Barnett wrote an encouraging letter to Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr. when Fitzpatrick published his first book in 1967 showing that Ampere
essentially laid the cornerstone for a simple, understandable unified field concept. You will find a full page in the Sunday Book Review section of the New York Times devoted to Fitzpatrick's book. This page in the Times has a big picture of a galaxy on it. . I forget which Sunday or even which month it was but I know the year was 1967. . If someone finds it, please give me the date and I'll update this web page.
Since his retirement, Fitzpatrick has put more of the pieces of this great puzzle together and has finally given us "a New Kind of Science" predicted by Stephen Wolfram.
Now, in this FREE e-book, Fitzpatrick shows you exactly why we have gravity and all the other invisible forces.
"It's so simple. It's so obvious. Why didn't I think of this?" will be the statement of a good number of scientists in many universities as this gets further attention.
These extremely simple Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws finally bring a clarity to the reasons we have both magnetism and gravity. . All you have now is utter confusion. . The majority of high school graduates today do not even know that the north pole of the earth is really a south magnetic pole.
Explanation . With gravity the confusion is even worse because none in these universities can tell you the real reason why the arms of these spiral galaxies can exceed the speed of their escape velocity and still not fly all apart.
Using these "A" Laws, a kid in grammar school can easily visualize both magnetism and gravity correctly and understand far more of what is really going on than all those being presently graduated in all the high schools and all the universities.
The Hartree approximations
are proof that a brand new type of frequency math general relativity must replace the special relativity now being used in quantum mechanics. . Using only special relativity, quantum scientists will disagree about the distorted information that moves from that gauge (that TYPE of reference frame) to our reference frame here. . These easy to use "A" Laws show us the electron is in its own space-time
Explanation and not in our space-time. . Therefore we will not see the correct aspects of the electron's spin in our space-time reference frame.
Spin is presently viewed as simply a certain movement of a solid. . We do not see the complex wave function involved. . There is a complex wave function involved which these Aufbau or "A" Laws point out.
Milo Wolff correctly states "In Dirac's theoretical work the spin of a particle is measured in units of angular momentum, like rotating objects of human size. But particle spin is uniquely a quantum phenomenon, different than human scale angular momentum. Its value is fixed and independent of particle mass or angular velocity."
But the "A" Laws tell us that an entity's full inertial mass will only exist in one gauge. . Inertial mass cannot be entirely transferred out of any one particular spin/orbit frequency reference frame. . In other words we simply do not see the entire correct inertial mass of the electron in our reference frame. . Our reference frame is a quark-electron subharmonic frequency. . The electron spin is in a much higher frequency reference frame than our reference frame.
Or as Milo Wolff so accurately puts it: "The frequency mc2/h of the waves was first proposed by Schroedinger and deBroglie, proportional to the mass of the electron. This frequency is the mass so that mass measurements are actually frequency measurements. There is no mass 'substance' in nature."
The quantum people, who do not understand this and who do not understand that a different gauge means an entirely different space-time interval (different frequency space resonance) and who understand nothing of general relativity nor of these new "A" Laws will claim that the spin of the electron is different from the earth's spin. . People who say that are absolutely wrong and scientists Samuel Goudsmit and George Uhlenbeck were absolutely right: . The electron spins exactly like the earth spins---but in its own TYPE of space-time reference frame (gauge),
Explanation which is certainly not our reference frame.
Fitzpatrick spells it out to the quantum experts in terms they understand. . He says, "The advantages of using a new form of general relativity based on Milo Wolff's math, over the special relativity now being used in quantum mechanics, is that it will be more accurate than the Hartree approximations. . It will allow one to quantize without fixing another gauge, because this is essentially what general relativity does. . It will also allow one to see that the same type distortion of space-time that causes the earth's spin also causes the electron's spin. . It---like the "A" Laws---will allow one to clearly see that the spin of the smallest particle is really no different from the spin of the largest super cluster."
Fitzpatrick then continues:
"All the electron really has is a form of gyroscopic inertia in its own spin/orbit frequency reference frame (gauge) but we mistakenly see this as magnetism and charge in this entirely different subset reference frame of ours. . I've been explaining the essentials of this in various publications since 1967."
"In 1925 Samuel Goudsmit and George Uhlenbeck not only discovered that the electron was spinning but they also saw they could determine the direction in which these electrons were spinning. Explanation This was the first time we could see our laws of magnetism were obscuring the correct picture. . Our present laws of magnetism were derived long before anyone even knew about electrons and these laws should have been changed in 1925 with this discovery of the electron spin. . Unfortunately this entire world seems perfectly content with its inept, bureaucratic educational system and these laws of magnetism were never changed."
"If you look down at the north pole face of a magnet the electrons causing the magnetism, in that magnet, will all be spinning clockwise. . Do the same for a magnet with its south pole facing you and the spins will all be counter-clockwise. . However, when you reverse this south pole magnet and see it attracts the other magnet, all the spins in both magnets are now clockwise from your point of view. . So it's no longer opposites attracting once you reverse one of the magnets. . Electrons in both magnets are spinning the SAME way when these magnets are attracting. . The old idea of opposites attracting should have gone out the window in 1925."
"High schools and universities still teach that in magnetism opposites attract. . North and south poles do seem to attract each other if you are ignorant about the electron spin, but this is positively displaying the wrong message. . Exactly the reverse picture that similar geodesic paths attract is what is needed. . We know the spinning electron
is the smallest unit of magnetism and these "A" Laws agree perfectly with what we know as fact. . An example is that these electrons will only attract when they are "locked" in a position so that the closest sides of each are going in the same geodesic path. . These "A" Laws then show us the reason a polar attraction is the strongest of any angular attraction: . In a polar attraction the entire portions of both electrons are spinning in the same geodesic path. . This is a far better and clearer explanation of magnetism than that presently being taught.
Also, by using this (Ampere's) description of magnetism, you produce a method of unifying not only the invisible forces of magnetism and gravity but the strong and weak forces as well and the laws used in this method are called "Ampere's Laws", "the Aufbau Laws" or simply the "A" Laws."
"If you teach science then you have a moral responsibility to teach your students that the attraction in magnetism is caused by similar geodesic paths attracting and NOT opposites attracting. . Poisoning the minds of millions of kids with this ancient BACKWARDS assumption of magnetism has been the biggest factor in preventing several generations of scientists from finding the answer to Einstein's quest for a unified field."
"It's been over 75 years now that scientists and educators knew that electrons would attract other electrons when their closest sides were moving the same way and this attraction is stronger in a polar attraction where the entire portions of these electrons are spinning in the same direction. . Yet they are still preaching "opposites attract" almost the very reverse of this."
"You cannot continue to preach an old legend and claim that you are teaching science."
"When you know what you are teaching is wrong, and actually the reverse is true, then you are as guilty as those Nazi's in Nuremberg who said, "I was only obeying orders."
"And this is only the tip of the iceberg of what is wrong."
"Yes, you can use these old legends (like opposite magnetic poles attract) as long as you match some math to them but they will only work in one gauge (type of reference frame). . Present science has matched some math to many old legends. . People will eventually discover this. . You cannot fool all the people all the time."
"Only electrons that are perfectly FREE are able to repel each other 100% of the time. Read the free T.O.E. e-book to see why. . Electrons that get more or less "locked" into a certain position both attract and repel other electrons and act exactly like tiny magnets. . These "locked" electrons---attracting other electrons---facilitate chemical bonding."
Once you know that two electrons attract whenever the closest sides of these electrons are going in the same geodesic path then it behooves one to ask the following question: . Will all these other spinning entities, we see both in the microcosm and macrocosm, behave the same way? . And the answer surprisingly comes out YES.
The following is Fitzpatrick's Law and it pertains to all of these spinning entities we see in our universe whether they are in the microcosm or the macrocosm.
Every perfectly FREE spinning entity will always repel another same type, same sized, perfectly FREE spinning entity. .
All the invisible attractive forces, in this entire universe, are derived whenever these spinning entities lose some of their freedom and get "locked" somewhat into a certain position in respect to their surroundings.
Looking at this entire universe, all the FREE spinning entities---no matter how large or how small---repel all the other same sized similar entities just like the electron. . Attractive forces come about after these entities get "locked" somewhat into a certain geodesic path or position. . This is what all these universities should be teaching today but they are not. . And this is what this long web page and Fitzpatrick's e-books will explain to you if you take the time to read them.
Both special and general relativity show the transformation of space into time and time into space and so do these "A" Laws. . But in addition these "A" Laws show you why these transverse waves
Explanation (radio waves, light, heat and gravity) do not need any aether medium to function in and this is a first for any such theory.
Fitzpatrick says, "The tensor math of general relativity is the best mechanism we have so far that gives us accurate answers when things go too fast and/or get too massive. . Special relativity falls short in this respect. . So we must ask ourselves what kind of a universe is this in which this tensor math works so well? . We know it must be a pretty preposterous universe in which space can convert into time and vice versa so we must accept the answer even though the answer we come up with also seems preposterous."
The premise of this is simple: There are not really 4 fundamental forces
Explanation but actually only one invisible force. . But our present science, using a single subset reference frame, prevents us from seeing this as one force. . These extremely simple new "A" Laws show us exactly how all this comes about because of a constant creation of space-time
at different spin/orbit frequencies. . These "A" Laws not only give you the "big picture" of exactly how this occurs but they give humans the very first picture of what space and time really are as well. . These new "A" Laws instantly give you an "approximate big picture" of what is really happening and Dirac
predicted the human mind would eventually comprehend an "approximation" of what was really going on.
Now we are only scratching the surface and we only get an approximation with these "A" Laws. . But once Milo Wolff's math is further perfected and completely adapted to these "A" Laws then everyone will see that Stephen Wolfram is correct because in the future this will be the basic foundation programming for future super computers. . These future super computers will give humans the exact, accurate answers to all the information they are seeking about the various functions of this vast universe.
One big advantage of using these "A" Laws is that you get none of the various erroneous answers given out by the tensor math of general relativity. . An example is the singularity, which was long considered to be one of these erroneous answers until Stephen Hawking discovered it wasn't.
A problem with present science are all these subset rules and the math that is cooked up for them. . A good example are all these viewpoints or gauges used in quantum mechanics.
Explanation proved that if you were confined to within the parameters of one of these subset rules (gauges) then there would be no way that you could see it was merely a subset rule and you might even think that what you had was a true universal law.
And here on earth we are so confined.
Believing these subset rules are laws, is the trap present science has fallen into because this is a frequency universe. . The only math that can possibly work in this frequency universe is a type of frequency math similar to Milo Wolff's, that is matched to frequency laws similar to these "A" Laws. . All other math can only prove things are subset rules and therefore WRONG, not right. . So you know anything that is proven with any other math, than this frequency math, has to be a subset rule and not a true law.
Yes, the people in the quantum field have found out, this is definitely a frequency universe. . Our ancestors, who laid the foundation for our present science didn't know this. . They gave us laws for solids, liquids and gasses, which in fact are merely subset rules and not true laws. . But not to worry. . There's a easy way to understand all this.
You can even understand how general relativity works without knowing any tensor math. . This seems like a lofty statement but it is true. . Not only that but you can also see why general relativity works and even tensor math doesn't show you that.
First of all you have to ask the following question: . Why does the tensor math of general relativity work as well as it does? . There is only one answer to this: . It works because it accurately translates what is happening in other TYPE reference frames (other gauges) to your one, single, subset reference frame. . Or as quantum people would say it allows you to work entirely within one gauge without having to fix another gauge.
A reference frame or a gauge is essentially a view of things in which the combination of space and time (the space-time interval)
Explanation remains unchanged. . This allows rules for that particular gauge to be set up. . The rules in that gauge or view will not vary. (local gauge invariance)
You will be forced to set up new rules (fix another gauge) whenever the space-time interval changes appreciably. .
The Hartree approximations are virtual proof of this change of the space-time interval within the atom itself but today's scientists seem not to be able to see any proofs that contradict their old established beliefs.
Unfortunately our minds were developed in a vast area where the space-time interval does not change appreciably. . This is why many of our quantum theorists today do not understand the underlying reason why they must fix these different gauges. . You will remain in the realm of stone age science if you do not understand that, in different gauges, the space-time interval changes.
A vast improvement over these gauges used in quantum theory and the tensor math of general relativity are these new "A"