Allow me to cheer you up. A recent discussion with Jim on infophysics is converging into the idea of Smolin's QLG, which does away with surfaces and volumes in favour of orthogonal spin states and twistor connections.

My argument is, that this is fine above the Weyl-geodesic, where physical properties are measurable wrt the Planck Action.

Since the Planck-Action sets the perimeters for the quantised particles, their dynamics become subject to their quantisation scales as you point out above.

The motion you are referring to above might well be the information transmission as given by QLG and Jim's Infophysics.

I however still would isist, that the selfsame information is then classically representable in a form of quantum geometry holographically mapping the data algorithmically.

Much of this will be worked out in the future, after the basic premises are acertained.

Tony B.

You may wish to add your ideas on the discussion below.

Tony

Of course, but you didn't understand this derivation. The entire analysis shows that it is the effective electronmass, which is used in QR as the inertia for the dynamically interacting electron.

This problem was known in the 1920's and led to Schwinger numbers in the perturbation of the magnetic moment for the electron.

According to the wave mechanics of Dirac, the electron spin should be exactly one Bohr magneton eh/4Pi.m, but QED shows a small difference.

In showing that magnetocharge is related to mass via the stringcoupling of the magnetic monopole as [ec]unified, manifesting as c^3 eV, the finestructure of Heisenberg's h/4Pi crystallises as a function of the wormhole perimeter.

My analysis simply shows how the electromagnetic mass of the electron can be accounted for by this magnetocharge and then the textbook electronmass becomes subject to perturbation theory and the reduced charge formulations.

QR never uses this textbook value, as it is not incorporative of the electromagnetic mass component.

Tony

Correct and this elementary force is the magnetocharge force, manifesting as the Strong Interaction as the colourforce of the gluons.

QR defines this as the Cuberoot of Alpha, relative to the invariance of Alpha as the Electromagnetic Interaction.

This reduces to the Squareroot of Alpha in the prewormhole epoch for the scaling of the Higgs Restmass Induction Scale, as set by the so called XL-Boson of superbrane class IIA.

You need to analyse the generation of the unified field, which describes the intrinsic spin angular momentum as the decisive factor for its genesis.

Tony

Very true Spacexdf/dt=Magnetocharge, THE underpinning definition in QR.

But MagnetoCharge behaves like Inverse Energy in the mapped F-space allowing the S-duality of the coupling strengths to manifest mass as 'Natural Electricity'.

Hence [ec]u as superbrane, energy 2.7x10^16 GeV (the known GUT-threshold) becomes a SourceCurrent in Ampere.Metres,, which relates the magneton as Magneton per unit displacement.

Introducing the magnetopole through this strong-weak coupling symmetrises Maxwell's Equations in Gauss, Faraday and the vectors of divergence and curl.

Tony

Yes, this is Milo's treatment to sum frequency states as the electron's wavefunction.

This links again to a new interpretation of the Psi^2.dV amplitude of the probabilities of finding the electron at position x.

As MagnetoCharge=(angular acceleration)(Volume); Angular acceleration (df/dt)/e* now describes 1/dV as the missing scalar allowing the statistical analysis.

So Psi^2 maps (Rate of change of frequency/MagnetoCharge).

Tony

Yes, I do not invoke the summation in the subsystems, as Milo did. I use the total collection of spinstates as given by the cosmological parameters as a direct macroquantisation from the superbranes as microquantisations in modular duality (Holographic Principle).

Then c-invariance describes the postulates of the relativities.

c^2 crystallises from the T-duality of electromagnetic to gravitational interactions.

c^3 becomes associated with the monopole as masscurrent leading to

[ec].c^2 = c^3 electronvolts as applied in high energy particle/wavelet physics as a natural consequence of S-duality.

Magnetic monopoles as elementary particles mapping individual quarks as colourcharged wavelets becomes EQUIVALENT to Quark summations (say colour/anticolour mesonic doublets/hyperonic colour triplets) as elementary particles mapping quantised magnetic monopoles as mass-currents.

Tony B.