The ANSWER Einstein
looked for Issued: July 10th 2018.

ANSWER
in htm: - *http://amperefitz.com/answer.htm*

Also
ANSWER in Word: - *http://amperefitz.com/answer.doc*

And
ANSWER in Adobe pdf: - *http://amperefitz.com/answer.pdf*

E=mc^{2}

or

Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared

**but**

"You can't square a speed",

said

Scientist Tom Van Flandern.

Scientist Tom Van Flandern is gone now but a
paper of his is still here: you can get it by clicking this link *Van Flandern*

"When you square a speed, you
get energy," wrote VanFlandern **later**,
in an e-mail to me.

Gravity travels far faster than light. As far
as NASA is concerned gravity travels instantly. Van
Flandern shows us the speed of gravitational attraction is greater than
or equal to 2 x 10^{10c}. This translated for the non mathematical
reader means, for a stable universe, gravity travels at least or more than 20
billion times the speed of light. (That's using American billion, not the
English billion.)

**First**, scientists know ALL electron magnetic type forces
like light and ordinary magnetic force all travel at c, or the speed of light.

Again: gravity travels far faster than light.
Gravity travels **instantly** or, as Van Flandern
shows us, at least 20 billion times the speed of light.

**Second**, free electrons can never attract each other. They
always REPEL each other. Only quark **harmonically** captured, orbital
electrons can attract other similar electrons (depending on their spin
orientation) or they can attract free electrons.

This showed me the supreme importance of the **harmonic**
aspect of all of this.

This **harmonic** aspect between the
electron and quark is the reason gravity can bend light because light is
electron generated and gravity is quark generated.

Many years ago I read this paper written by
Tom Van Flandern and saw, that since quarks had a faster spin than electrons,
then this faster spinning quark must be causing this faster gravitational
attraction. Strong force containment must be a myth and gravitational force
must be caused by a certain quark, probably the down quark.

I told Tom about the **harmonic** aspect
of it all and told him he proved the speed of gravity was right up there with c^{2},
the speed of light squared.

Tom's answer to me was simply, "You
cannot square a speed."

Years later I was discussing this with Nobel
Laureate Brian Josephson, who showed me the PROOF (below) of Tom Van Flandern's
statement.

**Try**
to square the speed of light, taking c that is 3x10^{8} meters per
second and squaring it to **9x10 ^{16}mps**.

But c is also 3x10^{10} centimeters
per second, and squaring it gives us 9x10^{20}cm.ps which converted
back to mps tells us c^{2} = **9x10 ^{18}mps**.

This is far faster that the initial c^{2}.

**This is Brian's PROOF that you cannot
square a speed!**

If you do not believe Brian's proof then find
a calculator that works to at least 21 decimal places and square **both**
the speed of light in meters per second and then in miles per second. **You will find that the meters per second squared, speed is a
far FASTER SPEED than the miles per second squared, SPEED!**

I'm writing this **speed squared** correction
to many paper's that I've written years ago: it cannot be a square because **one
cannot square a speed**. So it's best ONLY to say one quark spins at a
harmonic of the electron's spin frequency. It must be an extremely high harmonic of the electron if the speed
of gravity is more than 20 billion times the speed of light.

And the quark must not only spin but precess
at an extremely high harmonic of the electron
if both a spin up and spin down electron can encircle it.

A quark spinning at an extremely high harmonic of the electron's spin
frequency would only slightly affect the freedom of a free electron BUT that's
all it would take because an electron needs 100% freedom to entirely repel
other 100% free electrons, because BOTH must have EXACTLY equal precession to
keep repelling each other.

I've already explained why this is so in many
previous internet papers, such as in the following link. *amperefitz.com/darkmtr.htm*

So Einstein's c^{2} is *indeed* a
riddle wrapped inside an enigma that we are still trying to solve, because *'you
can't quantize without fixing the gauge'*. Your math only gives accurate measurements in your spacetime realm or
'your gauge'. Atomic energy (mc^{2}) is being generated within both the
quark and electron spacetime realms, neither of which is your spacetime realm.

In the quark spacetime realm, after the Big
Bang, iron became the best balanced element. __Fission__ and __fusion__ work on **opposite sides** of the
BALANCE SCALE. Fission *builds up* the smaller elements into pieces
closer to iron and fusion *breaks up* the larger elements into pieces
closer to iron.

Both fission and fusion atomic energy are now
slowly re-balancing the quark realm better toward the element iron.

Without this present slight unbalance,
neither life nor this array of elements is able to exist.

The establishment misses all this because
they would rather believe in old myths than the **balance** evidence that
you can get by clicking those two, previous links.

Given enough time, with fission and fusion
energy, this universe will be converted entirely to iron, or elements close
enough to it, where no more atomic energy scalar
balancing is possible.

Dr. Milo Wolff, one of those NASA scientists
that helped get us to the moon, taught me that this is a scalar frequency universe all throughout.

If we are tuned to a frequency close to or at
Planck's Constant, then we will only be able to see frequencies higher than us
(microcosm) as frequencies.

We will see lower frequencies than us
(macrocosm) as something else.

Einstein searched for laws that would unify
both micro and macro worlds. However, he failed.

BUT

If you read my writings, you will see, that
the one thing I've been absolutely certain of — since my first book in 1966 —
is that the phase laws, given to us by Andre M. Ampere in the 1820s, are
universal laws, good both in the micro and macro worlds, while our present
science rules are merely subset rules, that can **not** be interchanged between
the microcosm and macrocosm.

Once you know something like this, that the
mob doesn't, then that allows you to solve more science problems than the mob
can.

The following in
blue is from my book *"Universities Asleep at the Switch"*
that I published well over a decade ago.

Kurt Gödel proved that if we were confined in a subset realm — like here on
earth — without being able to see out far enough then we might believe that our
science laws were universal truths when this would be far from the truth. This
is exactly what has happened.

Berkeley, then Mach then Maxwell all told us surroundings were involved (Mach's
principle). Since this did not mix well with present science and made the math
too difficult, it was simply given lip service and largely bypassed and ignored
by the universities. The university presses printed, "Inertia is implicit
with the geodesic equation of motion." Now, thanks to my good friend Dr.
Milo Wolff, we have actual proof inertia is ** not** implicit with the
geodesic equation of motion; it's same frequency surroundings that are
involved. We have computers, coming on line in the future, that will do these
calculations and will give even more proof of this than Milo gave.

Dirac predicted that one day we would be able to see an approximation of how it all worked and how true this becomes. The basic building blocks of this universe are simple standing waves whose spins and orbits produce vector forces, but this fact is totally obscured by all our subset, local science laws and the tons of garbage printed by the university presses.

They do print some diamonds as well but the problem is the same as in a diamond mine where you have to go through many tons of mud to get only one diamond.

The diamond that this book is showing you is that it is surroundings, surroundings, surroundings and spins, spins, spins. It's surroundings and either spin or orbital binding. These spins are spins that bind, giving us not only binding energy but gravity, inertia, light and all the invisible forces as well.

In fact, that's what this book
will be explaining.

And that, essentially, is what you
should be looking at to get the big picture of how our entire universe works.

Even though we see energy as a vector force, we entirely miss the fact that, taking
the surroundings into consideration, energy is really an attempt at better
overall scalar balancing.

I'm afraid the present science establishment
entirely misses this and the supreme importance of Ampere's Laws.

Mathematician Stephen Wolfram hit the nail on
the head telling us, "Math can only explain
simple things, but a simple model can explain a complicated universe."

I believe we won't even have scratched the
surface of science until the establishment realizes the supreme importance of
frequencies and phase.

The simple phase
model that explains our complicated universe is right there in front of
our noses, but few see it.

Ampere's simple phase
model not only shows us exactly how our universe works but it showed me
that, while Einstein thought his biggest
blunder was the insertion of the factor denoted by the Greek capital letter
lambda into his General Relativity formula, his biggest blunder was in removing lambda from General Relativity.

If this paper is still around half a century
from now, the people reading it then will see I was right about this.

The removal of lambda, by Einstein himself, strengthened a Phlogiston type
myth, that has set us back in science far more than any myth yet.

I've enjoyed this world of science and I've
really enjoyed being the sole resident on a completely fenced 600 acre ranch
between Dripping Springs and Blanco here in Texas, but even in this area the
highway traffic is getting worse, so I handed my son the keys to my car with
only 5,000 miles on it and I will enjoy my 85th birthday, in a few weeks, in
one of the better retirement places here, near Austin, Texas.

If I kept my car and had an accident and it
wasn't my fault, these kids on the jury would say, "You know that old
geezer **had** to cause it!"

Still have my pilot's license that I got in
1950 when I was 17. I loved flying; they were my wings: the instant that I
emerged out of a cloud the ground was never level but tilted! WHY?

I saw it was centrifugal force playing tricks
on my senses, so I learned about using gyro instruments and took many hours of
necessary Link training.

Flew many airplanes, some my own. Never
wrecked one but almost killed myself several times. Guess all that flying is
over now too.

I knew early that I had to find out EXACTLY
how gyroscopes worked. Later in life I worked with the very latest in
electronics and gyros, for several decades.

This led me to far more knowledge about our
universe, and to finally be able to write this paper to all of you who want to
know a bit more about this universe than the present establishment can possibly
tell you.

November 25, 2017

http://rbduncan.com/darkmtr.htmhttp://rbduncan.com/darkmtr.pdfhttp://rbduncan.com/darkmtr.doc

Here's one on June 12th 2018
telling about a Britannica mistake, but half way through is a most interesting
dissertation on how our eyes see** C****O****L****O****R****S.**

Britannica
in html:

*http://rbduncan.com/britannica.html*

Britannica
in Word:*http://rbduncan.com/britannica.doc*

Britannica
in Adobe pdf:*http://rbduncan.com/britannica.pdf*

*See:
**Phase
symmetry makes quantum theory more complete. 12-02-2013*

Also
read (2005 addendum2017): *http://www.rbduncan.com/quarkspin.htm*

And:
*http://www.amperefitz.com/why.we.have.gravity.htm*

And
read **this page**: *http://www.amperefitz.com/abstract.htm*

Here's
the link **- **to** this abstract page**** - **in Adobe pdf: *http://www.amperefitz.com/abstract.pdf* (Click or
copy any of these links.)

For
**4 Decades** of my writings: click *http://www.amperefitz.com/4.decades.htm*

*45 Years of Putting this Jigsaw
Puzzle together - of unifying Gravity with all the other forces*

45
Years of Putting this Jigsaw Puzzle together - of unifying Gravity with all the
other forces" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *45years.pdf*

*It's all nothing but RELATIVE
MOTION !!!.htm*

"Ampere
showed us, it's all nothing but RELATIVE MOTION !!! *(phase)*" (science)
e-book by Fitzpatrick __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *Amp.pdf*

Also
you can buy my latest book at Amazon or read it FREE using links below:

*http://www.amperefitz.com/unvasleep.pdf*
(This is the book in Adobe)

or

*http://www.amperefitz.com/unvasleep.htm*
(This book link opens faster if you have dial up.)

There
was a ** full** page in the New York Times devoted exclusively about

"Fitzpatrick's
First Book" __also__ in Adobe.pdf - *pge1.pdf*

Click
above links to read that first book of mine free.

I've
found out and published a lot more since then: Over
4 Decades of Fitzpatrick's Books, Papers & Thoughts in Microsoft "**Word**":

*http://www.amperefitz.com/4.decades.doc*

And
here's this page duplicated in Adobe.pdf: *http://www.amperefitz.com/4.decades.pdf*

Fitzpatrick's
website is at *http://www.amperefitz.com*

Another
older website carrying Fitzpatrick's works FREE is: *http://www.rbduncan.com*

Anyone
may copy and paste this complete presentation to their web page providing they
paste it in its entirety.

To
paste any of my pages to your desktop in their entirety, FREE, do as follows.

1.
Right click * link* of page.

2.
Click - send target as.

3.
Click - save.

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.

November 25, 2017

If
any of your work seems to correlate to my findings then please write to me at:

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Apt. 314

Belmont Village

4310 Bee Cave Road

West Lake Hills, TX 78746

*Send me your e-mail.*