The
ANSWER Einstein looked for Issued: July 10th 2018.

ANSWER in htm: - http://amperefitz.com/answer.htm

Also ANSWER in Word: - http://amperefitz.com/answer.doc

And ANSWER in Adobe pdf: - http://amperefitz.com/answer.pdf

Click these links below for this IMPORTANT UPDATE TO THE MUCH, MUCH FASTER c2 SPEED OF GRAVITY THAT CAHILL RIGHTLY ASSUMES.

Throwing a bit more light on

R.T. Cahill's Quantum Foam theory

I accept the mathematical proof of T. D. Martin that clearly shows the underlying flaw in Reginald T. Cahill's Quantum Foam theory

however

R. T. Cahill does begin with two assumptions that are clearly correct:

1. He has the speed of gravity down correctly.
2. This is important because today half the scientists believe in one speed but the astronomers all believe in the faster speed that Cahill assumes.

The speed of light is 3x108 meters per second. The problem with a 3x108 meters per second gravitational speed is that it is far too slow for astronomers because they all know that with this slow speed of gravity, our universe can't be stable.

Tom Van Flandern, cited by Cahill, showed that since gravity had no aberration and light did, then the speed of gravity had to be much, much faster than the speed of light and almost an instantaneous velocity. This was Newton's assumption as well.

In my e-mails to Tom Van Flandern, before he died, he agreed that a gravitational velocity of 9x1016 meters per second was an acceptable velocity as far as the astronomical group was concerned because at this velocity the universe would indeed be stable and this speed would also give gravity no aberration.

Tom Van Flandern did not like the term c2 at all saying, "You cannot square a speed!"

But nevertheless a speed of 9x1016 meters per second would appear to us as c2 or the speed of light (3x108 meters per second) squared.

A speed of gravity, astronomers can live with, therefore, is 9x1016 meters per second.

A velocity of 9x1016 meters per second is an almost instantaneous velocity that is well within the parameters of what the astronomical section of Van Flandern's Yale University; most other astronomical departments in other universities and Van Flandern would accept.

3. Cahill assumes the surroundings, in the background, are affecting our gravity. This too is absolutely correct. This is Mach's principle. But the problem with using this background data is that until you understand exactly why these spiral galaxy arms are exceeding their escape velocity then you must not depend on the accuracy of this background data because there is simply more happening there that you are still not aware of at this present time.

Even though T. D. Martin gave Reginald T. Cahill a failing grade, I'm giving his efforts a Shakespeare era rating of "passing fair" because Cahill's thinking is far ahead of the affenstahl group that dictates our present science beliefs: He is indeed correct on these two important points that I've pointed out herein. R. T. Cahill is one of the very few today who can actually think.

For more about where this quantity c2 is coming from see: http://www.amperefitz.com/assymfree.htm

VERY LATEST IN SCIENCE: Do Ampere's Laws give us the final answer to DARK MATTER?

7-7-2017.The final answer to the cause of Dark Matter.htm

Final and SIMPLE answer to the DARK MATTER attractive force.

In Word: 7-7-2017.Answer to DARK MATTER.doc

7-7-2017 Answer to DARK MATTER also in Adobe.pdf - 7-7-2017.Answer to DARK MATTER.pdf

Be sure to read: http://www.amperefitz.com/acceleratingexpandinguniverse.htm

See this short, clear picture: http://www.amperefitz.com/principle-of-equivalence.htm

There's a lot more too.

And this you can find out by buying my latest book Universities Asleep at the Switch at Amazon.com or by reading it FREE simply by clicking the following links:

http://www.amperefitz.com/unvasleep.htm (This link is faster if you have dial up.)

http://www.amperefitz.com/ua_20071020_ck_ds_jm_ds.pdf (This is the book FREE in Adobe.).

Over 4 Decades of Fitzpatrick's Books, Papers & Thoughts http://www.amperefitz.com/4.decades.htm

Web pages are at: http://www.amperefitz.com & http://www.rbduncan.com

Thanks for reading this. Let me know what YOU think. e-mail is Th1nker@indiainfo.com

Feb. 2, 2010

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.

Here's one on June 12th 2018 telling about a Britannica mistake, but half way through is a most interesting dissertation on how our eyes see COLORS.

Britannica in html:
http://rbduncan.com/britannica.html

Britannica in Word:http://rbduncan.com/britannica.doc

Britannica in Adobe pdf:http://rbduncan.com/britannica.pdf

Anyone may copy and paste this complete presentation to their web page providing they paste it in its entirety.

To paste any of my pages to your desktop in their entirety, FREE, do as follows.

1. Right click link of page.

2. Click - send target as.

3. Click - save.

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
© February , 2010

If any of your work seems to correlate to my findings then please write to me at:

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Apt. 329

Belmont Village

4310 Bee Cave Road

West Lake Hills, TX 78746

Send me your e-mail.