For the very latest in science, click links below:

*c.squared.html 11-25-2017**c.squared.pdf 11-25-2017* (Adobe)*c.squared.doc 11-25-2017* (Word)

Fitzpatrick's

Universal Quantum Coupling Concept

Based on WSM (Wave Structure of Matter)

This means it's based on the fact that everything in this universe is built from spherical standing waves or what Milo Wolff calls space resonances.

This is also based on the fact that our minds work best in a 3-Dimensional realm.

So, in this concept you must move your mind into each separate spin/orbit 3-D realm.

Sorry, but you cannot take any math, or your present science, with you into this concept.

Kurt Gödel warned you why in his famous proof:

Those who are confined to a subset gauge (*space-time realm*) will be deluded into thinking that their symmetry rules for that particular gauge (*space-time realm*) will be universal laws.

Stephen Wolfram recently reiterated this saying, "We need 'a New Kind of Science' ".

This is not the universe your ancestors believed in.

This is a wave universe.

The best way to view this wave universe is with universal wave laws - not with present science that restricts you to this subset reference frame.

Each spin/orbit system must be viewed as a separate 3-D space-time realm.

For instance: The quark system is a higher frequency space-time realm than the electron but they are linked via harmonics.

Viewing it all this way, you do get the best approximation of how the entire universe works.

1. Concept of the Quantum Time Frame.

In this we will presume that we ourselves are built from scalar wave space resonances: Thus we are "tuned" to these space resonances. Since we will have the same Quantum Time Frames as other similar resonances, we will not see the frequency *time-cycle* of such similar scalar wave space resonances.

These space resonances are built obeying the inverse square law.

We will say scalar waves have a *time-cycle* (difficult to see in time) while transverse vector waves have frequencies that are easier to distinguish in time.

The scalar wave *time-cycle* of any spherical space resonance establishes its Quantum Time Frame, which is strictly limited to that particular space resonance's spin/orbit gauge or space-time realm.

This universe attempts to place each space resonance on a geodesic path and with a geodesic spin and even precession whereby energy will be balanced with the vector energy given out equaling the vector energy received from the rest of the universe.

This universe, however, is only successful at keeping specific *time-cycle* space resonances here as permanent entities.

These spinning space resonances exist at certain spaced frequency intervals, much like piano keys, on a type of universe piano keyboard of perhaps infinite length.

Because we are "tuned" to a certain frequency ourselves, we will see all the faster *time-cycle* resonances as smaller and all the slower *time-cycle* resonances as larger.

2. Concept of the Quantum Space Frame

Each spinning space resonance of a certain scalar *time-cycle* will produce lower frequency quantum frames of space (transverse vector waves).

Each spinning space resonance produces lower frequency quantum frames of space (transverse vector waves) along its spin axis.

Each spinning space resonance produces lower frequency quantum frames of space (transverse vector waves) along its equatorial plane.

Each spinning space resonance also produces lower frequency quantum frames of space (transverse vector waves) by orbiting and by spin precession and orbiting precession.

Once more: This universe attempts to place each space resonance on a geodesic path or with a geodesic spin whereby it will be balanced with the vector energy given out equaling the vector energy received from the rest of the universe.

These Quantum Space Frames do * not* obey the inverse square law.

Each of these Quantum Space Frames (transverse vector waves) do * not* vary in strength with distance. They remain the same strength no matter how far the distance.

Only the ** NUMBER** of these Quantum Space Frames (transverse vector waves) from any spinning space resonance will obey the inverse square law.

All these space resonances, in turn, build and are built from Quantum Space Frames (vector waves). The vector waves building such a spinning space resonance are much higher in frequency than the scalar wave *time-cycle* of each space resonance being built.

We have, perhaps, an infinite keyboard of these Quantum Space Frames and Quantum Time Frames. Each resonance, doing the building, has a faster *time-cycle* than the resonance being built. (higher energy level) This universe could possibly be regarded as close to an infinite energy universe because each space resonance contains less energy than the level building it.

Fitzpatrick's Universal Quantum Coupling Concept pertains mainly to the vector quantum frames of space (transverse vector waves) of two similar space resonances.

Minimum space is generated between same frequency vector waves (and harmonics) that are in phase with each other

Maximum space is generated between same frequency vector waves (and harmonics) that are out of phase with each other.

All space resonances have inertial qualities including what we know here on earth as 90 degree gyroscopic torque. This gyro torque changes, however, as the same frequency surroundings change toward being homogeneous and isotropic.

BUT in the above we can use the term space because we are talking about only ONE specific time frame of one specific space resonance.

Since this universe contains many space resonances of different scalar wave *time-cycles* and consequently different Quantum Time Frames, then we are forced to dispense with the word space and use space-time. This, in turn, leads us to the "A" Laws, which show you exactly why we have magnetism, charge and Einstein's cosmological constant.

Einstein's cosmological constant is that repulsive force, which Perlmutter recently proved exists, between all the stars, galaxies and super clusters in this universe.

This shows you how the entire universe works.

This also shows why your present science rules and math are restricted to one certain spin/orbit gauge or space-time realm.

© 2003

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.

*Over 4 Decades of Daniel P. Fitzpatrick's Books, Papers and Thoughts*

Over 4 Decades of Fitzpatrick's Books, Papers & Thoughts http://www.amperefitz.com/4.decades.htm