(Reprinted with permission)
Norm,
You are correct in your assumption that our peer group  via
their present methods  will not find a link between general
relativity and quantum mechanics.
The reason is this:
Complementarity Principle
in physics, tenet that a complete knowledge of phenomena on
atomic dimensions requires a description of both wave and particle
properties. The principle was announced in 1928 by the Danish
physicist Niels
Bohr. Depending on the experimental arrangement, the behaviour
of such phenomena as light and electrons is sometimes wavelike and
sometimes particlelike; i.e., such things have a waveparticle duality
(q.v.). It is impossible to observe both the wave and
particle aspects simultaneously. Together, however, they present a
fuller description than either of the two taken alone. (see also
Index: waveparticle
duality)
In effect, the complementarity principle implies that phenomena
on the atomic and subatomic scale are not strictly like largescale
particles or waves (e.g., billiard balls and water waves).
Such particle and wave characteristics in the same largescale
phenomenon are incompatible rather than complementary. Knowledge of
a smallscale phenomenon, however, is essentially incomplete until
both aspects are known.
Copyright 19941998 Encyclopaedia Britannica
There is an actual REVERSAL between the way things work in
the microcosm and macrocosm  Milo
Wolff recently proved
this.
In the microcosm it works like this:
De Broglie waves around a closed loop, such as would be
associated with electrons circling nuclei in atoms, can persist only
if the undulations fit evenly around the loop; otherwise they cancel
themselves out. This requirement causes the electrons in atoms to
select only particular configurations, or states, among the many
that would otherwise be available.
The response of the wave properties of a particle to an external
force follows a basic law of quantum mechanics that, in its
mathematical form, is known as the Schrödinger equation.
Copyright 19941998 Encyclopaedia Britannica
The de Broglie wavelength formula gets reversed.  This even troubled de Broglie:
In 1923, while still a graduate student at the University of
Paris, Louis de Broglie published a brief note in the journal
Comptes rendus containing an idea that was to revolutionize
our understanding of the physical world at the most fundamental
level. He had been troubled by a curious "contradiction" arising
from Einstein's special theory of relativity.
First, he assumed that there is always associated with a particle
of mass m a periodic internal phenomenon of frequency ƒ [ƒ,
rather than the traditional Greek letter "nu", is used here for
purposes of compatibility with web browsers]. For a particle at
rest, he equated the rest mass energy mc² to the energy of
the quantum of the electromagnetic field hƒ. That is,
mc² = hƒ
where h is Planck's constant and c is the speed
of light.
De Broglie noted that relativity theory predicts that, when such
a particle is set in motion, its total relativistic energy will
increase, tending to infinity as the speed of light is
approached. Likewise, the period of the internal phenomenon assumed
to be associated with the particle will also increase (due to time
dilation). Since period and frequency are inversely related, a
period increase is equivalent to a decrease of frequency and,
hence, of the energy given by the quantum relation hƒ. It was this apparent incompatibility
between the tendency of the relativistic energy to increase and
the quantum energy to decrease that
troubled de Broglie.^{1}
[footnote].
The de Broglie wavelength formula can never be removed from the
microcosm and actually gets
reversed out here and in the macrocosm.
(More massive things are related to lower frequencies  not
higher  out here and in the macrocosm)
For instance as an electron drops closer and closer to the
massive nucleus, the light it emits goes toward the blue wavelength.
In the macrocosm light from more massive areas goes toward the
red
wavelength.
Believe it or not, Norm, our quantum mechanics peers have
evidently still not caught on to this yet.
There are thousands of references on the net where quantum people
are equating higher massed items (out here) with a higher
frequency.
All of this is pointed out in my Theory Of
Everything book  you get a blue shift when approaching a
higher mass, not a red shift as in the macrocosm.
Also in my
Theory Of Everything book is the fact that you cannot take the
deBroglie wavelength formula out of the microcosm and apply it to
items in the macrocosm where exactly the reverse is true
Return to RB Duncan Press
homepage
(c) 2003 RB Duncan Press All rights reserved Comments or
complaints about anything on this site??? post to: Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
Over 4 Decades of Daniel P. Fitzpatricks's Books, Papers and Thoughts
Over 4 Decades of Fitzpatrick's Books, Papers & Thoughts http://www.amperefitz.com/4.decades.htm
