SEE, — HOW the complexities of
FIELD THEORIES HID from us the fact that relative motion (phase) between these spinning entities, in the micro & macro universe, gives us all the attractive and repulsive Fundamental Forces.
Field Theories in html:

Also, Field Theories in Word:

& Field Theories in Adobe pdf:

Fitzpatrick's 1966 book showed the relative motion laws of A. Ampère unified the forces.
Fitz's first book in 1966

Fitz's 1966 book in PDF

EVERYTHING here is FREE, & NO pop up ads with these either.

RB Duncan Press Scientific Letter
R B Duncan Press

Scientific Letter
A Forum for Independent Voices
June, 2004 Edition

(R B Duncan Press homepage)

Newton and Einstein only gave us HALF the story.

by Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.

(Reprinted with permission)

Hubble himself warned us that this may NOT be an expanding universe with these words: "the possibility that the red-shift may be due to some other cause, connected with the long time or distance involved in the passage of light from the nebula to observer, should not be prematurely neglected".

As Aladar Stolmar so aptly put it: "The observations of Pioneer 10 and 11, Galileo and Ulysses spacecrafts so called "anomalous acceleration" proves that the Hubble discovered nebular red-shift is universal and distance caused with astronomical consequences. Not only the cosmology has to rebuild the entire science, starting from its foundation, but the hard science of physics also will have to undergo major renovations."

The consensus is therefore now moving back toward a steady-state universe once more.

Saul Perlmutter's recent findings actually prove we do have Einstein's original cosmological constant and therefore a steady-state universe.

What I totally fail to understand is this: if people now see this, and before the twenties saw this, as a steady-state universe then why oh why didn't they figure out what is holding all the stars, galaxies and super clusters apart?

It's quite simple:

Scientists knew gravity was the only monopolar force. All the others are bipolar.

Didn't anyone even look for the opposite repelling force?

It's right there in front of your nose.

Even Einstein said it was there and gave us a figure for calculating it - his cosmological constant.

Milo Wolff showed us that these entities such as the electron are spherical standing waves. And he showed us more.

All scalar standing wave entities - from the electron on up to galaxies and super clusters - have inertial and gyro torque qualities.

I published this in 1966. You will find a full page in the New York Times Sunday Book Review Section in 1967 telling about my book.

I still have a letter of approval about my book from Lincoln Barnett who was a friend of Einstein and who wrote the best seller "The Universe and Dr. Einstein".

I saw back then that Newton's laws and even Einstein's corrections to Newton's laws were only HALF the story.

Newton, corrected by Einstein, is giving you the attractive force ONLY. This is only HALF of the picture.

But Ampere gave you laws that tell you why you have BOTH attractive and repulsive forces not only in the microcosm but all through this entire universe.

Here they are. Use them. Click on the link below.

Ampere's Laws

Not only that, they are universal laws, good both in the microcosm and out here and in the macrocosm as well.

And they unify all the forces.

Good God, what more could anyone want than that?

Science today is absolutely nothing but the blind leading the blind.

After you finish looking at Ampere's Laws you can also read my FREE Theory Of Everything book.

Return to RB Duncan Press homepage

© 2004 RB Duncan Press
All rights reserved
Comments or complaints about anything on this site???
post to: Robert B. Duncan