ANSWER Einstein looked for Issued: July 10th 2018.
ANSWER in htm: -
ANSWER in htm: -http://amperefitz.com/answer.htm
Also ANSWER in Word:- http://amperefitz.com/answer.doc
And ANSWER in Adobe pdf:- http://amperefitz.com/answer.pdf
FREE !! Click ANY of these links below to get what you want. FREE !!
c.squared.pdf 11-25-2017 (Adobe)
c.squared.doc 11-25-2017 (Word)
Sunrise at Red Reef by Medium
Back to page 1.
Page 4. of fifteen pages.
Back to Page 3. - - Page 5.
Continued from page 3.
Both special and general relativity show the transformation of space into time and time into space and so do these "A" Laws. . But in addition these "A" Laws show you why these transverse waves Explanation (radio waves, light, heat and gravity) do not need any aether medium to function in and this is a first for any such theory.
Fitzpatrick says, "The tensor math of general relativity is the best mechanism we have so far that gives us accurate answers when things go too fast and/or get too massive. . Special relativity falls short in this respect. . So we must ask ourselves what kind of a universe is this in which this tensor math works so well? . We know it must be a pretty preposterous universe in which space can convert into time and vice versa so we must accept the answer even though the answer we come up with also seems preposterous."
The premise of this is simple: There are not really 4 fundamental forces Explanation but actually only one invisible force. . But our present science, using a single subset reference frame, prevents us from seeing this as one force. . These extremely simple new "A" Laws show us exactly how all this comes about because of a constant creation of space-time Explanation at different spin/orbit frequencies. . These "A" Laws not only give you the "big picture" of exactly how this occurs but they give humans the very first picture of what space and time really are as well. . These new "A" Laws instantly give you an "approximate big picture" of what is really happening and Dirac Explanation predicted the human mind would eventually comprehend an "approximation" of what was really going on.
Now we are only scratching the surface and we only get an approximation with these "A" Laws. . But once Milo Wolff's math method is further perfected and completely adapted to these "A" Laws then everyone will see that Stephen Wolfram is correct because in the future this will be the basic foundation programming for future super computers. . These future super computers will give humans the most accurate answers to all the information they are seeking about the various functions of this vast universe.
One big advantage of using these "A" Laws is that you get none of the various erroneous answers given out by the tensor math of general relativity. . An example is the singularity, which was long considered to be one of these erroneous answers until Stephen Hawking discovered it wasn't.
A problem with present science is that we have all these subset rules and all this math that is cooked up for them. . A good example are all these viewpoints or gauges used in quantum mechanics.
Kurt Gödel Explanation proved that if you were confined to within the parameters of one of these subset rules (gauges) then there would be no way that you could see it was merely a subset rule and you might even think that what you had was a true universal law.
And here on earth we are so confined.
Believing these subset rules are laws, is the trap present science has fallen into because this is a frequency universe. . The only math that can possibly work in this frequency universe is a type of frequency math similar to Milo Wolff's, that is matched to frequency laws similar to these "A" Laws. . All other math can only prove things are subset rules and therefore WRONG, not right. . So you know anything that is proven with any other math, than this frequency math, has to be a subset rule and not a true law.
Yes, the people in the quantum field have found out, this is definitely a frequency universe. . Our ancestors, who laid the foundation for our present science didn't know this. . They gave us laws for solids, liquids and gasses, which in fact are merely subset rules and not true laws. . But not to worry. . There's a easy way to understand all this.
You can even understand how general relativity works without knowing any tensor math. . This seems like a lofty statement but it is true. . Not only that but you can also see why general relativity works and even tensor math doesn't show you that.
First of all you have to ask the following question: . Why does the tensor math of general relativity work as well as it does? . There is only one answer to this: . It works because it accurately translates what is happening in other TYPE reference frames (other gauges) to your one, single, subset reference frame. . Or as quantum people would say it allows you to work entirely within one gauge without having to fix another gauge.
A reference frame or a gauge is essentially a view of things in which the combination of space and time (the space-time interval) Explanation remains unchanged. . This allows rules for that particular gauge to be set up. . The rules in that gauge or view will not vary. (local gauge invariance) Explanation
You will be forced to set up new rules (fix another gauge) whenever the space-time interval changes appreciably. .
The Hartree approximations are virtual proof of this change of the space-time interval within the atom itself but today's scientists seem not to be able to see any proofs that contradict their old established beliefs.
Unfortunately our minds were developed in a vast area where the space-time interval does not change appreciably. . This is why many of our quantum theorists today do not understand the underlying reason why they must fix these different gauges. . You will remain in the realm of stone age science if you do not understand that, in different gauges, the space-time interval changes.
A vast improvement over these gauges used in quantum theory and the tensor math of general relativity are these new "A" Laws. . The math for these new laws is here and being developed. . When perfected this will be the Holy Grail of mathematical science. . But even now these new laws do give you a splendid "big picture" of what is really going on, not only in the macrocosm but in the microcosm as well.
What is now theoretically possible, and someday will be done, is that by using a computer one will be able to look from the viewpoint of any gauge (specific type of reference frame) and have all the other gauges (specific reference frames) accurately mathematically portrayed via the computer. . This will easily be done using these "A" Laws and this new math. . You will understand exactly how this will be done if you take the time to read this rather extensive web page.
The "A" Laws
Acceptance of these Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws will result in profound and drastic changes in the planning areas of controlled nuclear fusion and space travel.
Special relativity and general relativity are the tools scientists use to show how different observers will see space and time differently. . . Relativity shows us the relationship between space and time. . It shows us that we actually have something called space-time. . It also shows us the idea, our ancestors gave us about space and time being entirely different things, is absolutely wrong.
You can see for yourself how life seems only to persist for a fraction of a second at a time. . This is how movies are made, using different still shots one after the other but at a certain fixed frequency. . These "A" Laws show us that a similar frequency method using still shots (strings) Explanation is how our own particular space and time is also being produced.
The big problem with our human thinking is that we consider ourselves as existing through time when this is not quite correct. . It is your mind making you believe that you are the same person you were at five years old. . You are not the same person you were at five. . Therefore, you are also not the same person you were a second ago either. . Your components keep changing and this assemblage, that you call you, will last as long as all your components stay perfectly in tune with the surrounding frequency universe.
What type of a surrounding frequency universe is this??
Stay tuned and keep reading.
Fitzpatrick says, "The biggest surprise in the lives of all these quantum people will come when they see what inertia really is. . They will see that inertia has a frequency foundation similar to quantum theory and all this is explained by simply looking at these "A" Laws. . Once any quantum expert sees what causes inertia then he or she will also be astonished at how quantum theory fits so beautifully into the grand master jig saw puzzle of this entire universe."
Michael Faraday, who made the first electric motor Explanation and who gave us our present laws of magnetism, was the first to attempt to unify the invisible fields of gravity and magnetism.
Einstein felt he also could arrive at a unified field theory. Explanation
Einstein looked for a simple answer to all these invisible forces. Explanation
After I read Fitzpatrick's T.O.E., I saw Einstein was right: . This universe is built on one, solitary, diamond, building block "A" Law concept. . It's so simple that the human mind can easily understand it. . However, using this single basic diamond building block concept, we get various symmetries of construction. . Our present science laws show us only a few of these symmetries or only a few facets of this diamond or only a few subset reference frames or only a few subset gauges.
These "A" Laws show us a gauge (quantum theory) is a specified frequency spin/orbit space-time reference frame that is seen and measured by us quite differently, here in our subset, space-time reference frame.
These Aufbau or "A" Laws tell you that by far the best gauge to fix is the spherical standing wave frequency spin/orbit space-time reference frame gauge that nature itself provides with the various spinning particles it makes from these spherical standing waves.
You must understand that any information from one gauge (space-time reference frame) to another different gauge will become distorted. . Future super computers will resolve all this distortion and as Stephen Wolfram points out, they will tell us what is really going on. . But we don't have these now. . Resolving this distortion and agreeing about what is happening in these other gauges (other TYPE reference frames) is today's biggest headache.
Once you see the "big picture" then you will see how all the pieces of present science fit into and build this entire universe.
You will then immediately realize that all our present science laws are merely subset rules.
Our present laws of gravity, magnetism, charge and in fact all our mechanical laws are not true laws. . They are merely rules for another subset gauge exactly like in quantum mechanics.
Daniel Fitzpatrick says "We have all this empty space with things spinning and orbiting in it in the microcosm exactly like in the macrocosm. . We must look for other similarities in both, which few present scientists seem to be doing. . Our mistake was in designing separate science laws and math for each, separate symmetry of construction (gauge) and therewith failing to heed Kurt Gödel's warning Explanation about such subset math and science laws" . .
From the point of view handed to us by our ancestors, reality turns out to be even more fantastic then any science fiction tale yet produced.
The force between individual spinning electrons is inversely proportional to the 4th power of the distance between them. . This is showing you the microcosm compression of space-time is the square of our space-time and helps to explain why (E=MC2). . This is not telling you the microcosm and macrocosm use different laws. . What this is telling you is that the space-time Explanation that these entities "see" is not the same space-time that you see. . It is an entirely different gauge. . This is more evidence that these "A" Laws are correct and that space-time is being produced at various spin/orbit frequencies.
All these different gauges (quantum theory) have local gauge invariance within each gauge. . This is telling you that each of these different gauges also has an invariance of the space-time interval within each gauge as well. . In other words, there are different amounts of space-time in each different gauge
The different amounts of space-time (different space-time intervals) in these different gauges (reference frames) is responsible for the distortion of information that goes from one gauge to another different gauge.
What changes in the microcosm is the space-time interval. Explanation . Space-time in the microcosm is more compressed than our space-time. . Even so, the microcosm still uses the same "A" Laws as the macrocosm.
The scientists of today understand that the quantum world is a frequency world but they simply do not understand that this entire universe is a frequency universe as well. . We humans are no different from a radio set that is tuned to a certain frequency. . We only see the space-time generated by certain spin/orbit frequencies that we are tuned to.
String theory makes sense in such a frequency universe where these non dimensional strings can be thought of as blitzseits or similar to the individual film frames that make up a movie. . The movie that we are seeing is this universe, which only really exists---in its present form---to us who are tuned to this quark-electron harmonic frequency (the frequency of our movie projector).
My old friend, on the internet, who goes by the name of Susysewnshow brought this article to my attention. . This article states, "Using two HST images, astronomers from Italy and Germany looked for but did not find evidence supporting a prevailing scientific theory that says time, space and gravity are composed of tiny quantum bits."
Yes, they assumed this because they also assumed the gravitational quantum bit was exactly like the light quantum bit but it is definitely NOT.
The gravitational quantum bit is of a much shorter interval of time than the light quantum bit. . Even String Theory is telling us this.
Not only are time, space and gravity composed of quantum bits but magnetism is as well.
This article from the University of Alabama is typical of wrong assumptions because the people writing the article assume gravity, inertia and space-time are NOT of a quantum foundation. . The reason they assume this is that they do NOT know that light quanta are derived from the electron's precession and gravity is derived from the quark spin. . The quark spins faster than the electron precesses and therefore each separate quark quantum like blitzeit of time is far shorter than each electron precession quantum of energy (hf) or blitzeit of time (hf). . A blitzeit being one movie frame or the shortest interval of time possible at that spin/orbit/precession frequency. . Once you know this then you also see why those distant objects are not blurred and this still remains a quantum frequency universe all throughout.
You must understand that there is really only one force in this universe and it is space-time creation with a resulting inertial force. . Inertial mass is being created by quantum linkages at each and every spin/orbit/precession frequency. . We may not see all these forces as inertial in our reference frame but in their own spin/orbit/precession, space-time reference frame they are inertial forces.
This means that we must learn to specify the frequency/type of inertial mass. . Electron mass is derived at a far lower frequency than gravitational mass. . The formula hf = mc2 is only true in regard to light and heat energy. . It is NOT true in regard to gravitational energy.
One cosmic frequency clock, that deBroglie Explanation showed us --- f = mc2/h --- is not the wavelength of the electron per se but instead it is the wavelength of the electron's precession or wobble. . The term h (Planck's constant) can only be used with electron precession waves. . h is only a constant in regard to the electron's spherical standing wave precession and hf is only a quantum of energy or a blitzseit of space-time at the electron's precession frequency.
Another cosmic clock is the scalar wave frequency of the electron that Milo Wolff discovered. . In fact, all angular momentum (spins, orbits and precessions) are merely multiples of the scalar wave cycle that builds up the entity that is spinning , orbiting or precessing. . So all of these can be considered cosmic frequency clocks. . In the microcosm are various cosmic frequency clocks at a higher frequency than us and therefore we see electrons, quarks and such as solid point sized entities.
Consider three quantum cosmic frequency clock movie projectors creating space-time at three different frequencies:
1. The quark projector running the fastest, putting out inertial-gravitational spin quantum still shots at the fastest rate of qf (quark spin frequencies).
2. A slower electron projector putting out magnetic quantum spin frames at a slower rate of ef (electron spin Fine Structure Explanation frequencies).
3. An even slower projector putting out quantum precessional frames that we see as a wide bandwidth at the rate of hf . (the various intrinsic electron precession or wobble frequencies --- which produce our colors).
So there are more cosmic frequency clocks and we must get to know a bit more about clocks qf and ef before we can solve Einstein's quest for a mathematically precise unified field theory.
Once you understand this then you also can easily comprehend the EPR effect Explanation or how light that travels a hundred years of your time from a distant star actually gets to your eye instantly. . The universe all around you is built at the quark spin frequency and this is a higher frequency than the electron spin or orbit frequencies which are themselves both higher frequencies than our quark-electron subharmonic frequency (the frequency the electron precesses in the vicinity of the tri-quark nucleus).
The Mossbauer effect and EPR (quantum entanglement) are both proof that a long length of time for you may be really instantaneous as far as other factors in this universe are concerned. . Einstein provided us with this knowledge.
In other words, all those numerous quark blitzeits of time, as the starlight comes to your eye, are completely over with in the span of a single one of our blitzseits of time at our electron-quark subharmonic frequency.
The Mossbauer effect, EPR and Heisenberg's uncertainty are all proof of multiple cosmic frequency clocks and that our bandspread is somewhat tuned to the abovementioned three cosmic frequency clocks.
"A new form of general relativity, counting frames (f), must replace the special relativity now being used in quantum mechanics because h represents a constant or the real inertial mass precession or wobble of the electron that never changes. . This wobble is much slower than the electron's orbital, much the same as the earth's precession or wobble is 26, 000 times slower than its orbital frequency. Explanation The intrinsic mass of the electron, however, does change to a far more intrinsic mass in those long drops of higher acceleration where it comes closer to the nucleus producing a quantum of violet light with twice the energy than a quantum of lower frequency red light." . . D. P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
You can therefore consider h to be the real inertial precession angular momentum or wobble mass of the electron. . But in our space-time we see hf changing and we see it as a color change because of the variation of the electron's intrinsic mass as the electron gets closer and closer to the nucleus and its space-time changes relative to our space-time. . The above paragraph also shows you that in the quantum world the tensor math of general relativity can be completely replaced by a frequency counter or frame counter. . So this is showing you how general relativity actually works
We simply could not have our concept of space and time along with EPR, the Mossbauer effect and Heisenberg's uncertainty without all these different types of spin/orbit/precession frequencies. . These various microcosm and macrocosm spin/orbit frequencies are the things that give our space-time its 3D perspective. . We are tuned to these and their harmonics. . So it really is only those other frequencies seen by us at our particular electron-quark harmonic frequency---much like a movie.
"Thus the cosmic clock could be an oscillator contained in every charged particle structure as suggested by de Broglie, provided the frequency is a property of space and if its waves communicate with other particles. Such clocks would be alike since space, the medium of the waves, is mostly homogeneous." . . Milo Wolff
So you are really nothing more than an oscillator similar to the oscillator in a superherterodyne radio. . This universe has no real dimension per se.
If you insist on holding to the present science view of the various individual forces then you will be forever in the dark. . But once you accept this Aufbau or "A" Law concept then the unification of the invisible forces becomes crystal clear and so easy to see that no math at all is needed for your mind to easily comprehend it.
There are not 4 fundamental forces but only one invisible force (space-time) being produced at different spin/orbit frequencies. . General relativity portrays these forces correctly in that these forces are really space-time distortions. . The "A" Laws clearly agree with general relativity as they show us that a repelling force is a maximum of space-time production and all attractions are really where a minimum of space-time is being produced.
Present science tells us we are in an accelerating, expanding universe. . If you want to understand why we have gravity then what is now improperly seen as a red shift type expansion should be correctly viewed as these new "A" Laws show it. . Space-time is being constantly created all around us but by a lesser amount between us and the earth thereby attracting us to the earth. . And this is an explanation more in line with what general relativity is telling us.
I'm only a book publisher who knows a bit about the tensor math of general relativity. But, after reading Fitzpatrick's Theory of Everything, I saw this "new kind of science" will be needed to obtain controlled nuclear fusion because surroundings must now enter the picture in a far different manner. I also saw the first reasonable explanation for Perlmutter's acceleration. Explanation And I saw that scientists failed to realize the supreme importance of Kurt Gödel's proof. Explanation A good many scientists do not even know that Gödel's proof applies to all the science laws. . You simply cannot see the "entire truth" from here on earth where you are limited to looking out from this single, subset reference frame.
This T.O.E. book showed me that Einstein undoubtedly would have given us a credible unified field hypothesis had he known about the acceleration that Perlmutter's group recently discovered. But Einstein didn't know about this acceleration that Saul Perlmutter's group found. Explanation He only knew about the perceived expansion of the universe.
Fitzpatrick simply tells us what Einstein would have told us had he known all the facts. Fitzpatrick also gives the quantum world the foundation for GLOBAL gauge invariance where only local gauge invariance has existed. Explanation And with magnificent insight, Fitzpatrick extends the quantum wave world to the rest of the universe. . Not only that but he says, "We will finally be able to quantize everything while remaining in one gauge, by using Milo Wolff's frequency scalar wave method together with this new "A" Law concept."
He also says, "Future scientists will demand far more accuracy than this present single reference frame view of science can possibly provide. . They will perfect Milo Wolff's new innovative frequency math method. Explanation They will also perfect this new Aufbau or "A" Law multiple reference frame concept of the universe and thereby completely eliminate Heisenberg's uncertainty. Explanation Read the free T.O.E. e-book to see why. . This WILL provide them super accuracy with future super computers. . This "new kind of science" will also give them a mathematical unification of the forces, Explanation which is not available now."
Fitzpatrick says, "Einstein gave us the "principle of equivalence", Explanation which is essentially the association of acceleration with gravity. . Einstein also initially gave us his "cosmological constant ", Explanation which is a force exactly equal in strength to gravity but the opposite in that it's a repulsive force between all the stars & galaxies and one could say between all the atoms & molecules as well."
"All space resonance spinning entities have only inertial forces and gyro inertia in their own space-time reference frames and their spin subsequently will produce both attractive and repelling vector forces the same as a spinning "locked" electron (magnetism). . It's extremely important that you read the chapter, in the FREE e-books, that shows you when all these spinning entities are free and the same size --- because of the 90 degree torque caused by gyroscopic inertia --- all these vector forces will be opposed by other vector forces, minimised and seen by us as the resulting component scalar repulsive force. . And as Einstein proved, this resultant scalar repulsive force (cosmological constant) between everything in our macrocosm is exactly equal to the total gravitational attractive forces." . . D. P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
All the universities in the world have completely dismissed this old idea of the cosmological constant put forth by Einstein. . As I write this in the year 2002, few scientists accept this force that Einstein once claimed was equal but opposite to gravity in that it was a repulsive force holding all the stars and galaxies apart. . Now this repulsive force is back in the news again. . Saul Perlmutter says Einstein was right all the time and Einstein did NOT make a big blunder by giving us this opposite force of gravity. . Presently a few scientists have even come forth to challenge present science and say Perlmutter is right.
So if Einstein was right and since we know gravity shows up as an accelerating contraction then won't gravity's equal and opposite force---Einstein's cosmological constant---show up as an accelerating expansion?
If Einstein would have known about this new found acceleration then he undoubtedly would have connected the dots and he would have seen the association of acceleration not only with gravity but also with---gravity's equal and opposite---this repulsive force as well. Once that's done and one knows about Murray Gell-Mann's Explanation idea of the quark; Ampere's "A" Laws and Mach's principle Explanation then one is well on the road to solving the unified field problem.
* * * continued on page 5. * * *
CONTINUED on Page 5.
Click above for Page 5.
*~~~* *~~~* *~~~* *~~~* *~~~* *~~~* *~~~*