R. B. Duncan Press

continued from page 2.

These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws lead us directly to Milo Wolff's concept, which in Wolff's words is "a proposal that was popular sixty years ago among the pioneers of quantum theory: namely that matter consisted of wave structures in space. Thus, it was proposed that matter substance, mass and charge, did not exist but were properties of the wave structure. Wyle, Schroedinger, Clifford, and Einstein were among those who believed that particles were a wave structure. Their belief was consistent with quantum theory, since the mathematics of quantum theory does not depend on the existence of particle substance or charge substance. In short, they proposed that quantum waves are real and mass/charge were mere appearances; 'Schaumkommen' in the words of Schroedinger. The reality of quantum waves, as suggested by Cramer (1986), supports the original concept of W. K. Clifford (1876) that all matter is simply 'undulations in the fabric of space'."

There's a renewal of interest in W. K. Clifford's concept now. Explanation

These simple "A" Laws show us that the abovementioned concept is probably true. . These Aufbau (Construction) Laws or "A" Laws show us how an entire universe could be constructed from nothing but spherical standing wave entities.

And this is consistent with Milo Wolff's opinion as well because he shows that particles can be formed by scalar quantum waves combining to form a standing wave

Tallyho4477 read Dan Fitzpatrick's e-book and wrote, "This science is so interesting. . I can't get over the concept. . It is as radical as it is elegant! . I'm sure my brain will now be preoccupied with this for some time to come. . Good show! . Does anybody know of more on this? . I'd like to see and read more of it. . I would like to know how this flies in the community; what they think of it; what they have to say about it."

So would I, tallyho. .. So would I.

"Robert Dicke Explanation was one scientist with all the tools, who knew and argued with Einstein, but who specifically ruled out the correct answer because he listened to his peers when he should have looked at the evidence that was all around him. . This is a spin/orbit frequency, "tuned circuit" universe and we are tuned to this wave universe much the same as a superheterodyne radio. . All repelling forces can be seen as maximum space-time creations exactly like a (high impedance) parallel tuned circuit with entities moving on geodesics 180 degrees out of phase with each other. . All attractive forces, such as gravity, can be viewed as a minimum of space-time creation overwhelmingly similar to a (low impedance) series tuned circuit with entities moving on geodesics in phase with each other.

Future super-computers, that will count the in phase vector waves (minimum space-time creation) and out of phase vector waves (maximum space-time creation) will be far superior to the tensor math of general relativity and all of present quantum mechanics.

This is essentially what these "A" Laws do now because they allow your mind to move completely out of your space-time realm and into these other space-time realms. . This eliminates extra dimensions and allows your mind to see things CORRECTLY: as 3-D and time in every space-time realm." . D. P. Fitzpatrick Jr.

Milo Wolff says, "The dual particle/wave nature of the electron has long been a paradox in physics. It is now seen that the electron consists entirely of a structure of spherical waves whose behavior creates their particle-like appearance. The correctness of this structure is supported by the physical laws which originate from this wave structure, including quantum theory, special relativity, electric force, gravity, and magnetism. This type of structure is termed a Space Resonance."

The Aufbau ("A") Laws show us that ALL permanent entities are also space resonances (spherical standing waves). . Furthermore these Aufbau Laws show us that different type entities are merely space resonances at different frequencies.

Here's what this, essentially, is all about:

Science depends on having standard units of time, mass and length. . Einstein showed us, unfortunately, that this standard was in trouble because these units seemed to vary. . Fitzpatrick's 1966 Laws --- now the "A" Laws show us the universe itself does indeed standardize units of time, mass and length but only within designated spin/orbit frequency parameters. . By also standardizing time, mass and length at each spin/orbit frequency --- instead of arbitrarily fixing the gauge --- future super computers will be able to exactly copy this example and mathematically unify the four fundamental forces to a precision undreamed of.

These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws keep things simple, therefore they obey the principle of "Occam's Razor". Explanation . Present science is anything but simple.

Fitzpatrick shows us that --- by using a single reference frame view --- present science is forced into this complexity.

The Achilles heel of our present science is its single, subset reference frame viewpoint. . While this simplifies the math, it also obfuscates the correct frequency viewpoint.

Fitzpatrick says, "The victory of present science's mathematical achievements, using a single reference frame, is a Pyrrhic victory because it has obscured the very universal laws that enable us to easily see what is really going on in this universe.".

The single reference frame idea would be fine providing all reference frames were exactly the same but they are NOT. . They are only the same in special situations where speed, mass and surroundings remain essentially unchanged.

General Relativity has proven that when speed and/or mass changes then the amount of space-time also changes and this makes various different reference frames seem to act differently --- sometimes quite differently.

And if you insist on viewing everything ONLY from your own reference frame, as present science insists on doing, then you most certainly will not see how this entire universe is functioning.

* * * continued on page 4. * * *

Click here for Page 4.

Click above for Page 4.


Page 3. of 21 pages Back to Page 1. Basics: in various languages More languages on page 4. English a New Kind of Science Russian Hayka	Italian Leggi dell'Ampère Spanish Leyes Del Amperio Page 3.	Click for Page 4. To get what you want: Click on any of the blue links. Back to Page 2. Swedish Amperen Lag German Die Aufbau Gesetze Fitz's Theory of Everything

	continued from page 2. These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws lead us directly to Milo Wolff's concept, which in Wolff's words is "a proposal that was popular sixty years ago among the pioneers of quantum theory: namely that matter consisted of wave structures in space. Thus, it was proposed that matter substance, mass and charge, did not exist but were properties of the wave structure. Wyle, Schroedinger, Clifford, and Einstein were among those who believed that particles were a wave structure. Their belief was consistent with quantum theory, since the mathematics of quantum theory does not depend on the existence of particle substance or charge substance. In short, they proposed that quantum waves are real and mass/charge were mere appearances; 'Schaumkommen' in the words of Schroedinger. The reality of quantum waves, as suggested by Cramer (1986), supports the original concept of W. K. Clifford (1876) that all matter is simply 'undulations in the fabric of space'." There's a renewal of interest in W. K. Clifford's concept now. Explanation These simple "A" Laws show us that the abovementioned concept is probably true. . These Aufbau (Construction) Laws or "A" Laws show us how an entire universe could be constructed from nothing but spherical standing wave entities. And this is consistent with Milo Wolff's opinion as well because he shows that particles can be formed by scalar quantum waves combining to form a standing wave Tallyho4477 read Dan Fitzpatrick's e-book and wrote, "This science is so interesting. . I can't get over the concept. . It is as radical as it is elegant! . I'm sure my brain will now be preoccupied with this for some time to come. . Good show! . Does anybody know of more on this? . I'd like to see and read more of it. . I would like to know how this flies in the community; what they think of it; what they have to say about it." So would I, tallyho. .. So would I. "Robert Dicke Explanation was one scientist with all the tools, who knew and argued with Einstein, but who specifically ruled out the correct answer because he listened to his peers when he should have looked at the evidence that was all around him. . This is a spin/orbit frequency, "tuned circuit" universe and we are tuned to this wave universe much the same as a superheterodyne radio. . All repelling forces can be seen as maximum space-time creations exactly like a (high impedance) parallel tuned circuit with entities moving on geodesics 180 degrees out of phase with each other. . All attractive forces, such as gravity, can be viewed as a minimum of space-time creation overwhelmingly similar to a (low impedance) series tuned circuit with entities moving on geodesics in phase with each other. Future super-computers, that will count the in phase vector waves (minimum space-time creation) and out of phase vector waves (maximum space-time creation) will be far superior to the tensor math of general relativity and all of present quantum mechanics. This is essentially what these "A" Laws do now because they allow your mind to move completely out of your space-time realm and into these other space-time realms. . This eliminates extra dimensions and allows your mind to see things CORRECTLY: as 3-D and time in every space-time realm." . D. P. Fitzpatrick Jr. Milo Wolff says, "The dual particle/wave nature of the electron has long been a paradox in physics. It is now seen that the electron consists entirely of a structure of spherical waves whose behavior creates their particle-like appearance. The correctness of this structure is supported by the physical laws which originate from this wave structure, including quantum theory, special relativity, electric force, gravity, and magnetism. This type of structure is termed a Space Resonance." The Aufbau ("A") Laws show us that ALL permanent entities are also space resonances (spherical standing waves). . Furthermore these Aufbau Laws show us that different type entities are merely space resonances at different frequencies. Here's what this, essentially, is all about: Science depends on having standard units of time, mass and length. . Einstein showed us, unfortunately, that this standard was in trouble because these units seemed to vary. . Fitzpatrick's 1966 Laws --- now the "A" Laws show us the universe itself does indeed standardize units of time, mass and length but only within designated spin/orbit frequency parameters. . By also standardizing time, mass and length at each spin/orbit frequency --- instead of arbitrarily fixing the gauge --- future super computers will be able to exactly copy this example and mathematically unify the four fundamental forces to a precision undreamed of. These Aufbau Laws or "A" Laws keep things simple, therefore they obey the principle of "Occam's Razor". Explanation . Present science is anything but simple. Fitzpatrick shows us that --- by using a single reference frame view --- present science is forced into this complexity. The Achilles heel of our present science is its single, subset reference frame viewpoint. . While this simplifies the math, it also obfuscates the correct frequency viewpoint. Fitzpatrick says, "The victory of present science's mathematical achievements, using a single reference frame, is a Pyrrhic victory because it has obscured the very universal laws that enable us to easily see what is really going on in this universe.". The single reference frame idea would be fine providing all reference frames were exactly the same but they are NOT. . They are only the same in special situations where speed, mass and surroundings remain essentially unchanged. General Relativity has proven that when speed and/or mass changes then the amount of space-time also changes and this makes various different reference frames seem to act differently --- sometimes quite differently. And if you insist on viewing everything ONLY from your own reference frame, as present science insists on doing, then you most certainly will not see how this entire universe is functioning. * * * continued on page 4. * * * Click here for Page 4. Click above for Page 4.
	~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~