R. B. Duncan Press

Page 6. of 7 pages.

Back to Page 1. - - to Web Page.

Continued from Page 5.

Chapter 18.

SEQUEL
Continuing now
38 years later
New discoveries add validity
to this 1966 book below

Scroll down.

Hi.

I wrote this book, pictured above, in 1966 because while working on an overhaul problem of the RCA RADAR scope at Pan American Airlines I realized by using Ampere's 1825 laws, instead of the more commonly used Faraday-Maxwell electrical laws, I could not only see the direction that the electron was spinning but Ampere's laws also showed me why I was being attracted to this earth. . I will never forget that day as long as I live.

The above book may eventually turn out to be recognized as an important science publication. . There were only 10, 000 of them printed. . If you have one then you had better hold on to it and not sell it because someday it may become a valuable item.

In spite of the tons of garbage put out by university presses throughout the world telling otherwise, there are two things that Einstein was absolutely right about:

#1. There is no aether. . No aether is needed if we utilize Milo Wolff's (SR) 'Space Resonance' concept.

#2. The speed of light (c) is the fastest velocity that our reference frame is "tuned to". . Again here we need to consider Milo Wolff's (SR) concept, and view Einstein's analogy in light of the (SR), a bit different than even Einstein saw it.

And there is a caveat to the above. . The speed of light is NOT the fastest speed for many other reference frames such as the spacetime reference frame of the quark. . Fastest velocity in the quark's realm is (186, 000 squared) miles per second or what we notice appearing in our math as c² . . More about this much faster than light, almost instant, quark binding velocity later.

The preponderance of the evidence, now coming in, is squarely on the side of this Ampere-relative motion concept as seen in the Law of Relative Motion that was laid out in the above book. . New pieces of the puzzle are rapidly falling into place with knowledge obtained by the various space telescopes and these new revolutionary non mechanical gyros. . All of this is pointing in this Ampere-relative motion direction.

Names, words or phrases that you do not understand on this page, or on the previous pages, can be clarified by simply copying them and then pasting them into Google. . Add quote marks to get exact phrase such as "space telescopes".

I'd suggest that you learn what a spacetime interval is by clicking on this spacetime interval link. . But please look at this formula for the spacetime interval: ds² = (cdt)² - dl² . . Please note the term (cdt) where c = the speed of light. . . This is the speed of not only light but all (electron to electron binding) action at a distance. . If this binding speed for other particles changes, as will be shown, then the spacetime interval for that particle (i.e. quark) is NOT invariant but will also change.

I intend to show you that in the quark realm the term c in the above spacetime interval formula changes what to we will notice as c²in our spacetime realm.

In other words the - supposedly invariant - spacetime interval CHANGES for different scalar frequency particles.

Quarks, that have a 'scalar wave resonance' frequency the square of the electron, will have an entirely different spacetime interval and therefore an entirely different spacetime realm from ours.

What this page is mostly about is the fact that things that are viewed as merely motion in a reference frame realm of a certain spacetime interval may be viewed as a force in an entirely different spacetime interval reference frame.

When you are observing things in the microcosm and macrocosm, you are looking at things that are in various different spacetime interval, reference frame realms.

They have an entirely different spacetime from yours.

This is the reason we THINK we see all these different, distinct forces.

Milo Wolff showed us the electron is a scalar wave resonance resonating with ALL the surrounding electrons. . This IS important.

It is the makeup of BOTH the surroundings and the entities themselves that determine if and when a scalar wave resonance will develop.

They come like keys on a piano - ONLY at certain spots in this infinite frequency spectrum.

And some get entirely eliminated such as the positron gets entirely eliminated by harmonics emanating from the tri-quark entities making up both the neutron and proton.

But every distinct, different frequency scalar wave resonance entity has its own spacetime interval.

Why ? . . Because the term c in the spacetime interval formula means the speed of action at a distance and this changes for every different scalar wave resonance frequency.

Scalar resonances are those things, we know exist, such as quarks, electrons, assemblages of quarks and electrons, orbitals, orbits, solar systems, galaxies, and etc.

Your science laws cover only a small scalar wave resonance bandspread of this infinite frequency spectrum.

Therefore your science laws are merely nothing but subset rules for another 'gauge ' like those used in quantum mechanics.

Strange as it may seem:

what I am going to try to impress upon you herein is that gravity, charge and magnetism are merely motions in three different spacetime interval realms. . Yet they are seen by us as three distinct forces in our fourth spacetime realm.

Milo Wolff has already given us his 'space resonances' (SR) math, which one day may effectively unify the 4 fundamental forces.

As this book points out: there is only one common element in the fields of the four fundamental forces and that is:

_________

(SR) motion relative to
same frequency surroundings.
_________

So if a unified field answer, for those extremely different fields is sought, it MUST be as a concept of relative motion, and Ampere in 1825 gave us the best laws ever for examining things such as that.

I saw, way back in 1966, that it was all nothing but relative motion in regard to the surroundings and that gravity, charge and magnetism were merely certain motions in their respective spin/orbit frequency reference frame realms that 'appeared ' to me as gravity, charge and magnetism in my reference frame realm.

But the most important thing that I have learned, so far, in this search for a common law for all these invisible forces, was taught to me by Kurt Gödel whose famous proof shows us that if we try to look at this entire universe from one, single reference frame then we are defeating our purpose, if we want to see the 'big picture'.

You are condemned to thinking you have universal laws when all you have are subset rules for one reference frame if your mind remains only in one, single reference frame realm. . You are then like a radio that stays tuned to only one frequency.

Kurt Gödel is saying: you are forced to see 4 different fundamental forces only because you allow your mind to remain tuned to a specific subset reference frame realm.

You MUST shift to, and use, different reference frames - the same way different 'gauges ' are used in quantum theory - if you want to see the 'big picture' or see any universal laws.

There is no such thing, in present science, as global gauge invariance for this entire universe. . In other words our present science, that restricts us to one single reference frame realm, can have NO universal laws. . All we have now are subset rules for each particular fundamental force. . This shows our world is a wave world and we are really using different 'gauges ' just like in quantum theory.

We are finding out that we must view things - not as we see them in our realm - but as they really are, in their own spacetime reference frame realms, and with Dr. Milo Wolff's elegant yet simple mathematical proof, that the electron is a scalar wave 'space resonance ' (SR), we can now view things as scalar wave resonances in their own spacetime realms. . Plus Milo has given us the math to do this.

Milo has shown us that we must now view all things as both waves and particles just as we presently view light.

What several scientists have recently discovered shows that the above 1966 book was the first publication on earth to correctly point out the approximation of everything, that Dirac predicted we'd find or the first genuine unified field theory that Einstein was looking for.

If we merely add frequency to the Law of Relative Motion in the above book then we get a frequency modification of Ampere's laws 1825 which are a similar set of laws that become the epitome of the quest in the above book.

Milo Wolff's 'space resonances ' (SR) and his wave density concept are the cornerstones upon which this universe is built. . His Minimum Amplitude Principle show us how waves behave. . It and this frequency modification of Ampere's laws 1825 are similar in that they both take into consideration the surroundings (Mach's principle). . Watch what they show us.

The reason that Ampere's laws work is that this universe is really nothing but a wave universe all throughout from the microcosm to the macrocosm and we have inside us an oscillator detector similar to that in the best detector circuits (i.e. superheterodyne).

The Superposition principle is the CORNERSTONE of wave action behind those above laws of Ampere.

It's simple

just as Einstein predicted.

As it pertains to scalar 'space resonances '

this is it, below:

_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________

Scalar, standing wave 'space resonances ', with similar same frequency surrounding entities, give us what we term particles, orbitals, orbits, inertial qualities and our concept of time.

These spinning, standing wave, scalar 'space resonances ', that we see as particles, orbitals, agglomerations of particles or orbits, produce lower frequency transverse waves that give us ALL our vector forces.

Repulsive force (space) - between these scalar wave 'space resonances ' - is produced by out of phase vector resonances, while in phase vector resonances create no space or cause, what we term, attractive forces.

You must now specify the frequency of the space and the frequency of the time you are talking about.

_____________________________________________
_____________________________________________

Believe it or not: this entire universe is as simple as that explanation above.

However, not only all the surroundings (via Mach's principle), but their frequencies, now must also be taken into consideration, therefore the mathematics involved will be the very reciprocal of simplicity

I saw part of this first in 1966 using the Law of Relative Motion.

Later I added the necessary frequency modification to it to obtain these similar set of laws Ampere's laws 1825 or The "A" Laws that are modified laws of Ampere which allow you to work out problems both in the microcosm or macrocosm or here in more electrical problems than you can solve with the present, most used, Faraday-Maxwell concept.

Continued on page 7.

* * * to Page 7. * * *

Click here for Page 7.

Click above for Page 7.

to Web Page.

* * * back to Page 1. * * *

Click here for Page 1.

Click above to go back to Page 1.


	Page 6. of 7 pages. Back to Page 1. - - to Web Page. Continued from Page 5. Chapter 18. SEQUEL Continuing now 38 years later New discoveries add validity to this 1966 book below Scroll down. Hi. I wrote this book, pictured above, in 1966 because while working on an overhaul problem of the RCA RADAR scope at Pan American Airlines I realized by using Ampere's 1825 laws, instead of the more commonly used Faraday-Maxwell electrical laws, I could not only see the direction that the electron was spinning but Ampere's laws also showed me why I was being attracted to this earth. . I will never forget that day as long as I live. The above book may eventually turn out to be recognized as an important science publication. . There were only 10, 000 of them printed. . If you have one then you had better hold on to it and not sell it because someday it may become a valuable item. In spite of the tons of garbage put out by university presses throughout the world telling otherwise, there are two things that Einstein was absolutely right about: #1. There is no aether. . No aether is needed if we utilize Milo Wolff's (SR) 'Space Resonance' concept. #2. The speed of light (c) is the fastest velocity that our reference frame is "tuned to". . Again here we need to consider Milo Wolff's (SR) concept, and view Einstein's analogy in light of the (SR), a bit different than even Einstein saw it. And there is a caveat to the above. . The speed of light is NOT the fastest speed for many other reference frames such as the spacetime reference frame of the quark. . Fastest velocity in the quark's realm is (186, 000 squared) miles per second or what we notice appearing in our math as c² . . More about this much faster than light, almost instant, quark binding velocity later. The preponderance of the evidence, now coming in, is squarely on the side of this Ampere-relative motion concept as seen in the Law of Relative Motion that was laid out in the above book. . New pieces of the puzzle are rapidly falling into place with knowledge obtained by the various space telescopes and these new revolutionary non mechanical gyros. . All of this is pointing in this Ampere-relative motion direction. Names, words or phrases that you do not understand on this page, or on the previous pages, can be clarified by simply copying them and then pasting them into Google. . Add quote marks to get exact phrase such as "space telescopes". I'd suggest that you learn what a spacetime interval is by clicking on this spacetime interval link. . But please look at this formula for the spacetime interval: ds² = (cdt)² - dl² . . Please note the term (cdt) where c = the speed of light. . . This is the speed of not only light but all (electron to electron binding) action at a distance. . If this binding speed for other particles changes, as will be shown, then the spacetime interval for that particle (i.e. quark) is NOT invariant but will also change. I intend to show you that in the quark realm the term c in the above spacetime interval formula changes what to we will notice as c²in our spacetime realm. In other words the - supposedly invariant - spacetime interval CHANGES for different scalar frequency particles. Quarks, that have a 'scalar wave resonance' frequency the square of the electron, will have an entirely different spacetime interval and therefore an entirely different spacetime realm from ours. What this page is mostly about is the fact that things that are viewed as merely motion in a reference frame realm of a certain spacetime interval may be viewed as a force in an entirely different spacetime interval reference frame. When you are observing things in the microcosm and macrocosm, you are looking at things that are in various different spacetime interval, reference frame realms. They have an entirely different spacetime from yours. This is the reason we THINK we see all these different, distinct forces. Milo Wolff showed us the electron is a scalar wave resonance resonating with ALL the surrounding electrons. . This IS important. It is the makeup of BOTH the surroundings and the entities themselves that determine if and when a scalar wave resonance will develop. They come like keys on a piano - ONLY at certain spots in this infinite frequency spectrum. And some get entirely eliminated such as the positron gets entirely eliminated by harmonics emanating from the tri-quark entities making up both the neutron and proton. But every distinct, different frequency scalar wave resonance entity has its own spacetime interval. Why ? . . Because the term c in the spacetime interval formula means the speed of action at a distance and this changes for every different scalar wave resonance frequency. Scalar resonances are those things, we know exist, such as quarks, electrons, assemblages of quarks and electrons, orbitals, orbits, solar systems, galaxies, and etc. Your science laws cover only a small scalar wave resonance bandspread of this infinite frequency spectrum. Therefore your science laws are merely nothing but subset rules for another 'gauge ' like those used in quantum mechanics. Strange as it may seem: what I am going to try to impress upon you herein is that gravity, charge and magnetism are merely motions in three different spacetime interval realms. . Yet they are seen by us as three distinct forces in our fourth spacetime realm. Milo Wolff has already given us his 'space resonances' (SR) math, which one day may effectively unify the 4 fundamental forces. As this book points out: there is only one common element in the fields of the four fundamental forces and that is: _________ (SR) motion relative to same frequency surroundings. _________ So if a unified field answer, for those extremely different fields is sought, it MUST be as a concept of relative motion, and Ampere in 1825 gave us the best laws ever for examining things such as that. I saw, way back in 1966, that it was all nothing but relative motion in regard to the surroundings and that gravity, charge and magnetism were merely certain motions in their respective spin/orbit frequency reference frame realms that 'appeared ' to me as gravity, charge and magnetism in my reference frame realm. But the most important thing that I have learned, so far, in this search for a common law for all these invisible forces, was taught to me by Kurt Gödel whose famous proof shows us that if we try to look at this entire universe from one, single reference frame then we are defeating our purpose, if we want to see the 'big picture'. You are condemned to thinking you have universal laws when all you have are subset rules for one reference frame if your mind remains only in one, single reference frame realm. . You are then like a radio that stays tuned to only one frequency. Kurt Gödel is saying: you are forced to see 4 different fundamental forces only because you allow your mind to remain tuned to a specific subset reference frame realm. You MUST shift to, and use, different reference frames - the same way different 'gauges ' are used in quantum theory - if you want to see the 'big picture' or see any universal laws. There is no such thing, in present science, as global gauge invariance for this entire universe. . In other words our present science, that restricts us to one single reference frame realm, can have NO universal laws. . All we have now are subset rules for each particular fundamental force. . This shows our world is a wave world and we are really using different 'gauges ' just like in quantum theory. We are finding out that we must view things - not as we see them in our realm - but as they really are, in their own spacetime reference frame realms, and with Dr. Milo Wolff's elegant yet simple mathematical proof, that the electron is a scalar wave 'space resonance ' (SR), we can now view things as scalar wave resonances in their own spacetime realms. . Plus Milo has given us the math to do this. Milo has shown us that we must now view all things as both waves and particles just as we presently view light. What several scientists have recently discovered shows that the above 1966 book was the first publication on earth to correctly point out the approximation of everything, that Dirac predicted we'd find or the first genuine unified field theory that Einstein was looking for. If we merely add frequency to the Law of Relative Motion in the above book then we get a frequency modification of Ampere's laws 1825 which are a similar set of laws that become the epitome of the quest in the above book. Milo Wolff's 'space resonances ' (SR) and his wave density concept are the cornerstones upon which this universe is built. . His Minimum Amplitude Principle show us how waves behave. . It and this frequency modification of Ampere's laws 1825 are similar in that they both take into consideration the surroundings (Mach's principle). . Watch what they show us. The reason that Ampere's laws work is that this universe is really nothing but a wave universe all throughout from the microcosm to the macrocosm and we have inside us an oscillator detector similar to that in the best detector circuits (i.e. superheterodyne). The Superposition principle is the CORNERSTONE of wave action behind those above laws of Ampere. It's simple just as Einstein predicted. As it pertains to scalar 'space resonances ' this is it, below: _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Scalar, standing wave 'space resonances ', with similar same frequency surrounding entities, give us what we term particles, orbitals, orbits, inertial qualities and our concept of time. These spinning, standing wave, scalar 'space resonances ', that we see as particles, orbitals, agglomerations of particles or orbits, produce lower frequency transverse waves that give us ALL our vector forces. Repulsive force (space) - between these scalar wave 'space resonances ' - is produced by out of phase vector resonances, while in phase vector resonances create no space or cause, what we term, attractive forces. You must now specify the frequency of the space and the frequency of the time you are talking about. _____________________________________________ _____________________________________________ Believe it or not: this entire universe is as simple as that explanation above. However, not only all the surroundings (via Mach's principle), but their frequencies, now must also be taken into consideration, therefore the mathematics involved will be the very reciprocal of simplicity I saw part of this first in 1966 using the Law of Relative Motion. Later I added the necessary frequency modification to it to obtain these similar set of laws Ampere's laws 1825 or The "A" Laws that are modified laws of Ampere which allow you to work out problems both in the microcosm or macrocosm or here in more electrical problems than you can solve with the present, most used, Faraday-Maxwell concept. Continued on page 7. * * * to Page 7. * * * Click here for Page 7. Click above for Page 7. to Web Page. * * * back to Page 1. * * * Click here for Page 1. Click above to go back to Page 1.
	~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~