**Fitzpatrick's **1966 book showed the

**relative motion** laws of **A. Ampère** unified the forces.

*Fitz's first book in 1966*

*Fitz's 1966 book in Word* . . . . . . . . . . . *Fitz's
1966 book in PDF*

*http://rbduncan.com/WIMPs.html*

*WIMPs in Word* . . May 9, 2019 __ALL__ you
need to . . *WIMPs in
PDF*

know about **Dark Matter** particles - (WIMPs).

This was
the way the site --below-- looked many years ago, Dan Fitz.

**Shedding a bit of light
on the**

UNIFICATION

of __ALL__ the

INVISIBLE FORCES

Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.

&

Richard Mark Fitzpatrick

C.E.O. & founder of Magpul

© January. 2017

**We are going to start
right off with standing waves and spacetime realms. If you don't
know anything about either of these things then you need to read a bit about
them.**

Click: *http://www.ampere.com.com/toprule1.htm*

We are going to start with the
premise that Dr. Milo Wolff was right and **all these things** such as
quarks, electrons, stars, galaxies and galactic clusters are really* nothing
but* scalar, spinning, standing waves.

Each of these produce spacetime
realms that are entirely **different**.

However, in each of these
different spacetime realms we have - out-of-phase forces giving us ALL repelling forces and space,
(Einstein's Cosmological constant).

Balancing this and equal but
opposite to this are an equal amount — *not equal NUMBER but equal equivalent
energy amount — *of in-phase
forces giving us ALL the attracting and binding forces in this universe, ** not
only giving us energy**, but holding together

**In other words**, those spinning items smaller than us,
that we see as frequencies are really behaving **exactly the same** as those
spinning things larger than us that we see as solids!

This may be hard to believe, but
it's a FACT, even though our universities have given us entirely different
rules to use with all these different spinning entities.

**OK, What can we learn from
this?**

**This teaches us several
things:**

**First:** The establishment sees gravity as acting
instantly. That may or may not be so. What we know is that ALL these
gravitational forces that the establishment sees as acting instantly are ALL
quark generated forces that our math tells us is traveling at c^{2} or
the velocity of the *speed of light squared*. But that isn't so if this is
really a frequency universe all throughout and if these quark generated forces
are being generated via a quark spinning at the tenth harmonic of the electron
spin frequency.

**Second:** we have electron binding and**
attracting forces** traveling much slower

**Third:** We have THREE more forces also attracting
stars, galaxies and galactic clusters.

**Why?**

**Simple,** Stars, galaxies and galactic clusters all
spin even slower than the electron, thus they are not only getting the quark to
quark gravitational attraction to each other but they are **adding an
additional spin attraction to each other **

Einstein warned us about present
science in 1954 saying this: *"I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on
the field concept, i.e., on continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains
of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [**and of ] the rest of modern
physics."*

So, Einstein warned us about **modern science**** **didn't he?

But the universities — *the
establishment* — didn't heed this warning, did they?

You must realize **Einstein's
"Cosmological Constant"** is a BALANCE force, where in-phase
attractive forces must equal out-of-phase repulsive forces; thus, the repulsive
forces holding quarks, electrons, stars, galaxies and galactic clusters these
vast distances apart,** absolutely MUST EQUAL the **holding all these things together.

Well, let's consider that quarks,
*with the fastest spins we know about, (c^{2}),* give us
instantaneous gravity.

And, spinning electrons are
causing forces acting at the **much, much slower** speed of light (c).

**But wait a minute! **Those are spin frequencies of only TWO
entities. We have THREE more, don't we?

And, the establishment is looking
for all this **DARK MATTER** isn't it?

Since Dr. Milo Wolff *a
scientist who was on that celebrated team that got America to the moon*
claimed that stars, galaxies and galactic clusters are also scalar, spinning,
standing waves, like **quarks
& electrons**, then
might all that missing **DARK MATTER** come from the missing spins of stars,
galaxies and galactic clusters that this establishment of ours plumb forgot
about using in their math calculations?

Be careful:

We all have to be gauge theorists
in certain ways while examining our universe. Don't exceed the establishment's
local gauge (parameters) with your math or rules.

Current math and rules are only
to be believed in one, spin/orbit frequency, spacetime realm.

The only real universal rules are
PHASE rules.

And remember this important fact,
*people would much rather
believe what the universities publish than the truth***.**

If we are equating c^{2}
with the tenth harmonic of the electron's spin frequency then it's plain to see
**our math has led us astray.** Mathematician Stephen Wolfram
and Dan Fitzpatrick seem to be the first two people ever to understand "Math can only explain simple things
but a

All binding attractions are
IN-PHASE linkages.

All space type repulsions are
OUT-OF-PHASE linkages.

Fitzpatrick has given you, not
only the **'simple model' ****big PHASE picture**, but also a good ** simple model** of

The **total energy** of all
the IN-PHASE ** attractive force** binding quanta in this universe
equals the

But it is this OUT-OF-PHASE
structure that is the structure, containing Dr. Milo Wolff's spinning, standing
waves, that still eludes us in perfectly explaining the cause of what we see as
space and time.

Even though we now have the big
picture, the exact linkage model of these out-of-phase **repulsive forces**,
along with these spinning, standing waves, is somewhat yet an enigma. Exactly
why we see this entire spacetime assembly as the individual components of space
and time, is a mystery wrapped inside this enigma. All scientists should be
working on this mystery/enigma now: few are.

Now, thanks also to Dr. Milo
Wolff and Stephen Wolfram, this is the best model of our universe that anyone
has so far published.

Read about ** "PHASE SYMMETRY" **FREE: (these two

*http://www.amperefitz.com/phase.symmetry.htm*

or

*http://www.amperefitz.com/phase.symmetry.pdf*

Forty years of Fitzpatrick's
writings: *http://www.amperefitz.com/4.decades.htm*

**Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
&
Richard Mark Fitzpatrick**

Tuesday, January, 24, 2017

**FREE !!** Click ANY of these
links below to get what you want. **FREE !!**

**LOOK AT WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU TRY TO SQUARE A SPEED !!!**

*c.squared.html 11-25-2017*

*c.squared.pdf 11-25-2017*
(Adobe)

*c.squared.doc 11-25-2017*
(Word)

**Why a gyroscope ****defies gravity
**

*http://www.amperefitz.com/gyroscope.html*

*7-8-2018-How
a gyroscope REALLY works.*

*In
Word: http://www.amperefitz.com/gyroscope.doc
*

*7-7-2017
7-8-2018-How a gyroscope REALLY works.
also in Adobe.pdf http://www.amperefitz.com/gyroscope.pdf*

*VERY
LATEST IN SCIENCE: Do Ampere's Laws give us the final answer to DARK MATTER?*

*7-7-2017.The final answer to the
cause of Dark Matter.htm *

*Final
and SIMPLE answer to the DARK MATTER attractive force.*

*In
Word: 7-7-2017.Answer to DARK
MATTER.doc *

*7-7-2017
Answer to DARK MATTER also in Adobe.pdf - 7-7-2017.Answer to DARK MATTER.pdf*

**Anyone
may copy and paste this complete presentation to their web page providing they
paste it in its entirety.**

**To
paste any of my pages to your desktop in their entirety, FREE, do as follows.**

**1.
Right click **__link__** of page.**

**2.
Click - send target as.**

**3.
Click - save.**

**Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Jr.
**

**If
any of your work seems to correlate to my findings then please write to me at:**

**Daniel P. Fitzpatrick Apt. 314**

**Belmont Village**

**4310 Bee Cave Road**

**West Lake Hills, TX 78746**

*Send me your e-mail.*