This is a frequency universe but our minds were developed in this subset portion of this wave universe and you must heed Kurt Goedel's warnings about all your mathematical proofs in such a subset system.

But there is a mixed blessing in the way our minds see things: We can understand gyroscopic inertia (angular momentum) and we can understand relative motion and translational motion.

We can also understand 3D plus time.

Your math sword can cut you as easily as it can cut a path for you.

The space-time interval changes appreciably in both the microcosm and in the macrocosm.

About one eighth of Mercury's non-Newtonian precession is explained by special relativity where the space-time interval does not change that much and the rest is explained by general relativity where the space-time interval does change appreciably.

Quantum scientists are looking at the math and not at the real picture.

They don't realize that in looking at another space-time realm the math in this space-time realm will not relate to that other space-time dimension at all.

Most of our science is merely subset symmetry rules for this particular frequency subset spin/orbit, space resonance system we are in.

These exist in each spin/orbit frequency, space resonance system with separate inertial qualities in each a frequency derivative via same frequency surroundings.

And each spin/orbit, space resonance system has a far different 3D and time and is linked to the upper and lower frequency neighbor resonances via harmonics.

It's an exceptionally simple universe, really.

Yes, we have lost those days but we have been handed this information age on a silver platter.

I spent several months just re-visiting airports on CD ROMs.

Making instrument approaches to Miami International is like the real thing with the first marker coming on as you approach the shoreline and the ILS and localizer working once you dial in the frequency just like in real life.

I've also done many instrument approaches to Midway and O'Hare in Chicago as well and have flown the Concorde out of Paris and made that same turn into LeBourget that the ill fated Concorde crew was trying to make.

All on CD ROM, of course.

Covering the Suez and Panama canals - actually been to both those spots - was interesting too.

Hawaii - a spot my father and I loved during our real Pan Am trip around the world - was interesting too.

I flew all over the Caribbean, and in fact, all over the world this way.

Was surprised to see how Miami has grown in the past 17 years that I've been away and saw a new bridge built from Nassau to Paradise Island that wasn't there when I was there.

I miss not being able to lose excess altitude by slipping it in because you have no rudder pedals but this is just like flying the Ercoupe because it had none either.

The science info we can get now is astounding and I will gladly give up all the real flying to have instead all this science information that is on the internet today.

Britannica wanted - and got - $1000 for their 1996 Britannica CD ROM.

But that was too steep a price for me.

They offered the '97 to me first for $300 then for $250 then for $!35 at which point I sent them my check.

You could use it on the Mac or PC.

It would allow you to increase font size on the Mac but not on the PC.

But you couldn't get the bookmarks ever to work on the Mac but you could on the PC.

I bought the '98 but that only works on the PC.

I passed up their latest offer for the 2004 Britannica DVD for $25 because they failed to deliver the last one I paid for and I am now getting far more relevant information on this internet for free.

I've seen radios change, I've seen airplanes change.

But the most drastic change has been in the information sector and I welcome it with open arms.

Fitz

Milo,